CPU Comparison

Intel Core i7-4930MX vs Core i7-3940XM

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4930MX is an extreme edition mobile processor designed for the absolute highest-performance gaming and workstation laptops. Released in 2013 as part of the Haswell lineup, it features four cores and eight threads. What sets it apart from standard MQ chips is its unlocked multiplier, allowing enthusiasts to overclock the CPU for maximum performance. Operating at a base clock of 3.0 GHz and boosting up to 3.9 GHz, it delivers exceptional single-threaded and multi-threaded speed. It includes a full 8 MB of L3 SmartCache and carries a 57-watt thermal design power, reflecting its focus on raw performance over battery life. The integrated Intel HD 4600 graphics are present, though such systems invariably use discrete GPUs. This CPU was the pinnacle of mobile computing power in 2013, catering to a niche audience of hardcore enthusiasts willing to pay a premium for unlocked mobile overclocking.

Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-4930MX
4C / 8T3.9 GHz57 W
8
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7 Extreme
Core i7-3940XM
4C / 8T3.9 GHz55 W
8.2
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Segment
Mobile Extreme
Mobile
Generation
Core i7 Extreme (Haswell)
3rd Generation
Launched
2013
2012
Status
End-of-life
End-of-life
Codename
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Series
Core i7
Core i7 Extreme
Family
4th Generation
Ivy Bridge
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-3940XM
Intel Core i7-3920XM
Successor
Intel Core i7-4940MX
Intel Core i7-4930MX

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
8
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
TDP
57 W
55 W
Architecture
Architecture
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Process Node
22nm
22nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
1600 MT/s
DDR3-1600
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
32 GB
32 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel Socket G3
Intel Socket G2 (988B)
PCIe Version
Gen 3
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
Yes
Yes

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i7-4930MX78

8 threads and high clocks make quick work of compiling and rendering.

Core i7-3940XMBest79

High clocks keep it surprisingly snappy for basic tasks.

Gaming

Intel Core i7-4930MX65

Excellent for older games and can handle modern eSports easily with a discrete GPU.

Core i7-3940XMBest66

Excellent for 2012 games, can still handle older esports titles.

Virtualization

Intel Core i7-4930MX68

Good for running VMs, though limited by mobile platform constraints.

Core i7-3940XMBest76

Great for running VMs on the go.

Efficiency

Intel Core i7-4930MX40

57W TDP is very power-hungry for a mobile chip, resulting in poor battery life.

Core i7-3940XMBest45

55W TDP is terrible for battery life.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i7-4930MXLimited
  • No AI hardware
  • CPU inference is slow
Core i7-3940XMNone
  • No modern AI support
  • Instruction sets outdated

Content Creation

Intel Core i7-4930MXVery Good
Premiere ProAutoCADBlenderVisual Studio
Core i7-3940XMModerate
Video EditingHeavy PhotoshopCAD

Gaming

Intel Core i7-4930MXVery Good
  • Won't bottleneck 2013-era GPUs
  • Can be overclocked for extra FPS
  • Requires massive laptop cooling
Core i7-3940XMGood
  • Max Ivy Bridge single-core speed
  • Needs discrete GPU
  • Overclockable for extra headroom

Industry Impact

Gaming
High
High
Workstations
Moderate
High
Content Creation
Moderate
Moderate
Virtualization
Low
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Extreme Gaming (with GPU)
Excellent
Mobile Overclocking
Excellent
3D Rendering
Very Good
Very Good
Video Editing
Very Good
Heavy Multitasking
Excellent
Extreme Mobile Gaming
Excellent
Enthusiast Tuning
Excellent

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Targeted
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i7-4930MX

Pros

  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Full 8MB L3 cache
  • High 3.9 GHz turbo boost
  • Removable PGA socket

Cons

  • Extremely high 57W TDP
  • Runs very hot
  • Expensive launch price
  • Poor battery life
Core i7-3940XM

Pros

  • Unlocked multiplier for extreme overclocking
  • Highest Ivy Bridge mobile clocks
  • Socketed for upgrades
  • Excellent 2012 performance

Cons

  • Extremely high 55W TDP
  • Runs very hot
  • Lacks AVX2
  • Massive power draw for mobile

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i7-4930MX

Core i7-3940XM

Our Verdict on Each

A legendary mobile CPU that brought unlocked overclocking to laptops, offering desktop-level performance for enthusiasts.

Best for: Collecting vintage gaming laptops or extreme budget used systems.

Read the full review
Core i7-3940XMSituational

A minor but potent refresh of the 3920XM, offering the absolute best Ivy Bridge mobile performance with unlocked overclocking potential.

Best for: Maxing out an old extreme gaming laptop.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i7-4930MX or Core i7-3940XM?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-3940XM comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4930MX or Core i7-3940XM?

For gaming, the Core i7-3940XM leads with a gaming performance score of 66/100 among Intel Core i7-4930MX and Core i7-3940XM.

Which uses less power?

The Core i7-3940XM has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-4930MX (57 W), Core i7-3940XM (55 W).

Do Intel Core i7-4930MX and Core i7-3940XM use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-4930MX: Intel Socket G3, Core i7-3940XM: Intel Socket G2 (988B)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Core i7-3940XM posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4930MX (6,000), Core i7-3940XM (9,200). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.