CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i7-5700HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4770HQ is a high-performance mobile processor launched in July 2014, representing one of the final iterations of the Haswell Crystalwell family. Designed for premium mobile workstations and high-end laptops, it features four cores and eight threads, delivering robust computational power. Operating at a base clock of 2.2 GHz with a maximum turbo frequency of 3.4 GHz, it provides a noticeable CPU speed improvement over earlier Crystalwell models. The defining feature remains the inclusion of Intel HD Graphics 5200, supported by 128MB of integrated L4 eDRAM, ensuring exceptional graphics performance without a discrete GPU. This combination made it a favorite for creative professionals who needed portable machines capable of handling 1080p video editing and 3D rendering. With a 47-watt TDP, it demanded active cooling but packed immense capability into a mobile form factor. Though end-of-life, it was a premier choice for power users during the mid-2010s.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
High turbo clocks ensure smooth application performance.
Adequate for basic tasks but slow for modern multi-threaded workloads.
Gaming
Strong integrated graphics performance for older titles.
Handles older eSports titles well but struggles with modern AAA games.
Virtualization
Handles standard VMs well.
Can run basic VMs but limited by DDR3 memory bandwidth.
Efficiency
47W TDP is standard but outdated.
47W TDP results in poor battery life compared to modern mobile chips.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No dedicated AI hardware
- No AVX-512 support
- Unsuitable for modern AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Iris Pro 5200 handles 1080p low settings well
- Rivals entry-level discrete GPUs
- Suitable for older games
- Requires discrete GPU for 3D workloads
- Bottlenecks modern graphics cards
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- High 3.4GHz turbo boost
- Iris Pro 5200 graphics
- 128MB L4 eDRAM
- Strong quad-core performance
Cons
- Soldered BGA package
- 47W TDP requires good cooling
- Outdated 22nm process
- End-of-life
Pros
- Solid quad-core performance for 2015
- Good turbo boost frequencies
- Supports AVX2 instructions
- Reliable for legacy gaming
Cons
- End-of-life platform
- Uses outdated DDR3 memory
- High power consumption by modern standards
- Integrated graphics are very weak
- BGA socket prevents upgrades
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4770HQ
- AMD A10-7300MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4760HQRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4850HQRival
Mobile
Slightly faster Crystalwell model.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HAlt
Modern mobile powerhouse alternative.
Modern alternative with massive multi-core gains.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Modern creator laptop alternative.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-5700HQ
- AMD FX-8800PRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i7-4720HQRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i5-4210HRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i7-6700HQAlt
Newer Skylake architecture with DDR4 support.
- Intel Core i7-7700HQAlt
Better performance and efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAlt
Modern alternative with much better integrated graphics and battery life.
- Intel Core i5-8250UAlt
8th gen U-series outperforms it in multi-core while using less power.
- Alt
Revolutionary efficiency and performance leap over Broadwell mobile chips.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A powerful late-cycle Haswell chip that balanced high CPU clocks with class-leading Iris Pro integrated graphics.
Best for: Encountering a laptop with an Intel Core i7-4770HQ usually means looking at a used MacBook Pro or a premium Windows laptop from 2014. If you are buying, inspect the battery and cooling system first, as the 47-watt TDP often degrades these components over a decade of use. The processor itself remains surprisingly capable for 1080p video editing, running older creative software, and casual gaming, thanks to the potent HD 5200 graphics with eDRAM. However, single-core performance lags significantly behind modern chips. If you are performing a board-level repair, this chip is a direct replacement for failed 47-watt BGA 1364 processors, but it requires professional soldering equipment. Do not purchase a machine with this CPU for modern, heavy workloads; it will struggle with 4K rendering or modern AAA gaming. Treat it as a solid, budget-friendly machine for retro computing, light productivity, or as a media server, pricing it accordingly.
Read the full reviewA reliable workhorse of the mid-2010s that provided excellent quad-core performance for gaming laptops, though it is heavily outdated by modern efficiency and speed standards.
Best for: Purchasing a heavily discounted used laptop for retro gaming or basic typing.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4770HQ or Core i7-5700HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4770HQ comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4770HQ or Core i7-5700HQ?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4770HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 75/100 among Intel Core i7-4770HQ and Core i7-5700HQ.
Do Intel Core i7-4770HQ and Core i7-5700HQ use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4770HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4770HQ (8,300). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.