CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-10510Y vs Intel Core i7-1060G7
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-10510Y is an ultra-low power mobile processor launched in August 2019 as part of the 10th Gen Comet Lake-Y lineup. Designed for fanless tablets and extremely thin laptops, it operates at a mere 9-watt TDP. Built on the 14nm process, it features 4 cores and 8 threads, a significant upgrade from the dual-core Y-series chips of the past. It runs at a base clock of 1.2 GHz and can boost up to 4.5 GHz. With 8MB of L3 cache, it offers good responsiveness for everyday tasks. The processor includes Intel UHD Graphics for basic multimedia needs. While its low TDP ensures long battery life and cool operation, it also limits sustained performance under heavy workloads. The i7-10510Y is ideal for users prioritizing ultimate portability over raw computing power. It brought true quad-core performance to the sub-10W category for the first time.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Good for light office tasks but throttles under sustained load.
Good IPC ensures snappy performance, but low TDP limits sustained tasks.
Gaming
Only capable of running older or very simple 2D games.
Iris Plus graphics allow for playable frame rates in older or esports titles at low settings.
Virtualization
Not recommended due to low TDP and limited sustained performance.
Capable of light virtualization but limited by thermal headroom.
Efficiency
Extremely efficient, offering excellent battery life.
10nm process provides excellent efficiency for battery life.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Low power limits restrict inference performance
- Features Intel DLBoost
- Dedicated AI hardware acceleration
Content Creation
Gaming
- Basic UHD graphics
- Throttles quickly in fanless designs
- Iris Plus graphics are a major upgrade
- Can run CS:GO and LoL
- Not suitable for modern AAA titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Extremely low 9W TDP
- Fanless design capability
- Quad-core performance for tablets
- Good single-core burst speeds
Cons
- Throttles heavily under load
- Outdated 14nm process
- Uses LPDDR3 memory instead of DDR4
- Basic integrated graphics
Pros
- Modern 10nm Sunny Cove architecture
- Iris Plus Graphics with 64 EUs
- Intel DLBoost for AI
- Excellent power efficiency
Cons
- Low base and boost clocks
- 9W TDP limits sustained performance
- Soldered to motherboard
- First-gen 10nm yields were limited
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-10510Y
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-10210YRival
Mobile
- Intel Core m3-8100YRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 3450URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-8500YRival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cxRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1160G7Alt
Newer 10nm architecture with better efficiency and performance.
- Alt
Vastly superior performance per watt for fanless designs.
Compare head-to-head Better integrated graphics and IPC.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Much higher performance if a slightly thicker chassis is acceptable.
- Microsoft SQ2Alt
ARM-based alternative for extreme efficiency in tablets.
Intel Core i7-1060G7
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-10510YRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 3450URival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cxRival
Mobile
- Apple A12X BionicRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-1030G7Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1160G7Alt
Tiger Lake offers much better performance and efficiency.
- Alt
Superior performance per watt in the fanless category.
Compare head-to-head Higher 15W TDP allows for better sustained performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Much better CPU performance if a slightly thicker chassis is acceptable.
A newer 11th Gen alternative with similar efficiency but better clocks.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A highly efficient 9W processor that brought quad-core performance to fanless devices, though its performance is heavily throttled by thermal limits.
Best for: When considering a device with the Core i7-10510Y, it is crucial to understand its intended use case. This processor is best suited for users who prioritize extreme portability, fanless operation, and long battery life, such as students or traveling professionals. It handles web browsing, document editing, and media consumption perfectly fine. However, its 9W TDP means it will quickly throttle under sustained loads like video editing or heavy compiling. In the current market, devices with this CPU should only be purchased used or at a significant discount. Avoid this processor if you plan to do any gaming or intensive rendering. If battery life is your main goal, an Apple Silicon MacBook Air might be a better alternative, but for Windows-based ultra-portables, the 10510Y still offers a competent, albeit aging, experience.
Read the full reviewA highly efficient 10nm processor that brought significant IPC and graphical improvements to the Y-series, though its low clock speeds limit absolute performance.
Best for: The Core i7-1060G7 is a unique processor that offers an early glimpse into Intel's 10nm architecture. If you are buying a used device with this chip, you are getting a highly efficient processor with surprisingly capable Iris Plus graphics. It is an excellent choice for students and professionals who want a fanless, lightweight device for everyday productivity and light photo editing. The AI acceleration and AVX-512 support also make it interesting for developers experimenting with edge AI workloads. However, its lower peak clock speeds mean it will lag behind 14nm Comet Lake chips in raw single-threaded bursts. Avoid this processor if you need sustained high-performance computing or plan to play modern AAA games. It is best purchased at a discount, offering solid value for users who prioritize efficiency and integrated graphics over raw CPU frequency.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-10510Y or Intel Core i7-1060G7?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-1060G7 comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-10510Y or Intel Core i7-1060G7?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-1060G7 leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Core i7-10510Y and Intel Core i7-1060G7.
Do Intel Core i7-10510Y and Intel Core i7-1060G7 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1440 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.