CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-8400T vs Intel Core i3-8100T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-8400T is a low-power desktop processor belonging to the 8th generation Coffee Lake family. Released in April 2018, it is built on the 14nm process and features 6 cores and 6 threads. Unlike the standard i5-8400, the 'T' suffix denotes a reduced 35W TDP, making it ideal for small form factor (SFF) PCs and home theater setups. The base clock is set at 1.7 GHz, with a maximum turbo boost of 3.3 GHz. It includes 9 MB of Intel Smart Cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory up to 2666 MT/s. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 handles basic display tasks. With 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes, it provides adequate expansion options. The i5-8400T is compatible with LGA 1151 sockets, though it requires 300-series chipsets for official support, offering a balance of efficiency and multi-core capability.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
6 cores handle office tasks easily, though single-core is slower.
4 cores handle standard office suites well, but heavy Excel macros or large datasets will show the lack of Turbo Boost.
Gaming
Can handle light gaming, but low clocks limit high-refresh gaming.
The locked 3.1 GHz clock prevents playable frame rates in modern CPU-heavy games, and OEM systems rarely include a GPU.
Virtualization
Good for 1-2 VMs, but lacks hyper-threading.
4 threads without Hyper-Threading is the absolute minimum for any VM usage.
Efficiency
Outstanding efficiency with a 35W TDP.
Very efficient due to the low 35W TDP and lack of power-hungry turbo frequency spikes.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware.
- Low clocks make inference slow.
- No AI hardware.
- Fixed 3.1 GHz clock provides poor inference performance.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Low base clock can cause stuttering in CPU-bound games.
- UHD 630 is only good for very light titles.
- Best paired with a low-end discrete GPU if gaming.
- Fixed 3.1 GHz clock is too low for modern games.
- No Hyper-Threading limits background task handling.
- UHD 630 is not for gaming.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Extremely low 35W TDP
- 6 cores for parallel tasks
- Runs very cool
- Good for small form factor builds
Cons
- Low base and boost clocks
- Locked multiplier
- No Hyper-Threading
- End-of-life platform
Pros
- Very low 35W power draw
- Predictable, constant 3.1 GHz performance
- 4 physical cores for multitasking
- Includes UHD 630 for display outputs
- Can be configured down to 25W
Cons
- No Turbo Boost (locked at 3.1 GHz)
- No Hyper-Threading (4 cores = 4 threads)
- Low 72°C Tcase limit restricts cooler options
- DDR4-2400 memory speed limit
- Outdated 14nm process
- Only PCIe 3.0
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-8400T
- AMD Ryzen 5 2400GERival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-8400Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600ERival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-7400TRival
Previous Gen Low Power
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200GERival
Budget Low Power
Slightly faster clocks, same TDP.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GEAlt
Better integrated graphics.
Much faster modern architecture.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAlt
Better efficiency and performance.
Slightly higher clocks if buying used.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-8100T
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200GERival
Low-Power Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GERival
Low-Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-8100Rival
Standard Desktop
- Intel Pentium Gold G5400TRival
Budget SFF
- AMD Athlon 3000GERival
Budget SFF
The 10th gen successor adds Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost, and higher clocks.
Compare head-to-headIf upgrading an SFF PC, a 6-core T-series chip provides massive headroom.
Compare head-to-headAlder Lake offers a generational leap in IPC for modern SFF builds.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500GEAlt
6 cores/12 threads at low power for modern budget builds.
Our Verdict on Each
A highly efficient 6-core processor perfect for compact builds, though its low clock speeds limit performance compared to the standard 8400.
Best for: Building a quiet home server or retro gaming rig on a budget.
Read the full reviewA product of Intel's core-count strategy, the i3-8100T traded clock speed and threading for low heat output. It was adequate for basic office work in tiny chassis but aged rapidly due to its lack of Turbo Boost.
Best for: Only if you are repairing an existing SFF PC and can find the chip for under $15 on the used market.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-8400T or Intel Core i3-8100T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-8400T comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-8400T or Intel Core i3-8100T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-8400T leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Core i5-8400T and Intel Core i3-8100T.
Do Intel Core i5-8400T and Intel Core i3-8100T use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1151 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i5-8400T has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-8400T (6 cores), Intel Core i3-8100T (4 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-8400T posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-8400T (8,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.