CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-7500 vs Intel Core i5-8500B
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-7500 is a mid-range desktop processor launched in early 2017 as a core component of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake family. Featuring four physical cores without Hyper-Threading, it operates at a base frequency of 3.4 GHz and can boost up to 3.8 GHz. Manufactured on Intel's 14nm process, it fits within a standard 65-watt TDP, ensuring broad compatibility with mainstream cooling solutions. The processor was a popular choice for budget gaming builds and office PCs, offering a slight frequency bump over the i5-7400. It integrates Intel HD 630 graphics, capable of hardware-accelerated 4K video decoding, and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory at 2400 MT/s. While it provides snappy single-thread performance for everyday applications, the lack of Hyper-Threading limits its capability in heavily multi-threaded modern workloads. Utilizing the LGA 1151 socket, the i5-7500 remains a viable option for upgrading older systems, though it is outclassed by newer architectures in both efficiency and core count.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Snappy for everyday office work but struggles with heavy rendering due to 4 threads.
Handles office tasks and moderate programming workloads efficiently.
Gaming
Adequate for older games but bottlenecks modern GPUs in CPU-heavy titles.
Capable of smooth 1080p gaming in thin iMacs when paired with a discrete mobile GPU.
Virtualization
Limited by core count for running multiple VMs.
Good for basic VMs, but 6 threads limit heavy parallel virtualization.
Efficiency
65W TDP offers a good balance of power and heat.
Balanced performance within a standard 65W power envelope.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Inadequate for local AI model execution
- No AI-specific hardware
- CPU inference is slow due to lack of threads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Bottlenecks modern GPUs in CPU-intensive games
- Suitable for 60fps gaming with older mid-range GPUs
- Lacks the threads needed for modern AAA titles
- Usually paired with discrete mobile GPUs in iMacs
- Integrated UHD 630 is only for light gaming
- Thermally constrained by AIO chassis
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Good single-thread performance
- 65W TDP is easy to cool
- Hardware video decoding
- Solid choice for legacy budget gaming
- Affordable used
Cons
- Only 4 cores and 4 threads
- Locked multiplier
- Bottlenecks modern mid-range GPUs
- No official Windows 11 support
- Outdated PCIe Gen 3
Pros
- Soldered design saves physical space
- 6 physical cores for multitasking
- 4.1 GHz turbo boost
- Integrated UHD Graphics 630
- Optimized for thin AIO thermals
Cons
- Soldered to motherboard (not upgradeable)
- No Hyper-Threading
- Locked multiplier
- Only available via OEM channels
- End-of-life platform
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-7500
- AMD Ryzen 5 1500XRival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 1400Rival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-7400Rival
Desktop
- Intel Core i3-7350KRival
Desktop
- AMD FX-8370Rival
Desktop
Successor with 6 cores, offering much better modern gaming performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 1600Alt
Contemporary AMD alternative with 6 cores and 12 threads.
A cheap modern alternative with 6 cores and 12 threads.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
A vastly superior modern CPU for a similar price.
A modern budget CPU that outperforms it in every way.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i5-8500B
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600HRival
Mobile/Embedded
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-8500Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-8400Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Embedded AIO
A higher-tier soldered BGA processor for iMacs.
Compare head-to-headNewer generation socketed alternative with marginally better speeds.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A step up from the i5-7400, offering better clocks, but the 4-core/4-thread limitation makes it obsolete for modern heavy multitasking and gaming.
Best for: Upgrading an older LGA 1151 system on a strict budget.
Read the full reviewAn efficient 6-core processor tailored for OEMs. Its soldered BGA design saves space but prevents user upgrades, making it strictly for pre-built systems.
Best for: Board-level repair of an existing Apple iMac or embedded system.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-7500 or Intel Core i5-8500B?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-8500B comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-7500 or Intel Core i5-8500B?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-8500B leads with a gaming performance score of 75/100 among Intel Core i5-7500 and Intel Core i5-8500B.
Do Intel Core i5-7500 and Intel Core i5-8500B use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-7500: Intel Socket 1151, Intel Core i5-8500B: Intel BGA 1440), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i5-8500B has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-7500 (4 cores), Intel Core i5-8500B (6 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-7500 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-7500 (5,600). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.