CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4570R vs Intel Core i5-5675R
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4570R is a unique quad-core desktop processor launched in June 2013. Unlike standard Haswell chips, it belongs to the Crystalwell family and features a Ball Grid Array (BGA) 1364 socket, meaning it is soldered directly to the motherboard. Its standout feature is the integrated Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics, backed by 128MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM). This made it exceptionally powerful for integrated graphics at the time, capable of playing games like BioShock Infinite at 1080p without a dedicated GPU. Operating at 2.7 GHz base and 3.2 GHz turbo, it prioritizes graphical prowess over raw CPU frequency. With a 65W TDP, it was designed for compact systems like the Intel NUC and certain Apple iMac models. Although its L3 cache is reduced to 4MB, the eDRAM acts as an L4 cache, boosting both graphics and compute performance.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid quad-core performance, though slightly lower clocks than 4670.
3.6GHz turbo boost provides good single-thread performance for office apps.
Gaming
Surprisingly good for an iGPU from 2013, thanks to eDRAM.
Iris Pro 6200 handles older games and eSports titles well at 1080p.
Virtualization
Limited by 4 threads.
Adequate for light VMs but limited by DDR3 and 4 threads.
Efficiency
Highly optimized for 65W given the graphical power.
14nm Broadwell is efficient within its 65W thermal envelope.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- eDRAM doesn't significantly help modern AI workloads
- No dedicated AI acceleration
- DDR3 bandwidth bottlenecks execution units
Content Creation
Gaming
- Can play Bioshock Infinite at 1080p
- Handles older titles at 720p/1080p medium
- Still outdated for modern 3D games
- Similar iGPU performance to the i5-5675C
- Can play CS:GO and Dota 2 comfortably
- Not suitable for modern AAA gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Powerful Iris Pro 5200 integrated graphics
- 128MB eDRAM boosts memory bandwidth
- Compact BGA form factor
- Great for mini PCs and NUCs
- Supports Intel Quick Sync for fast video encoding
Cons
- Soldered to motherboard (BGA), no upgrades
- Lower CPU clocks than standard Haswell parts
- Only 4MB L3 cache
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- Difficult to find standalone
Pros
- Strong integrated graphics performance
- High 3.6 GHz turbo boost for single-thread tasks
- 65W TDP is great for small form factors
- Includes 128MB eDRAM cache
Cons
- Soldered to the motherboard (BGA)
- Locked multiplier prevents overclocking
- Limited to DDR3 memory
- Only 4 cores and 4 threads
- Difficult to find as a standalone part
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4570R
- AMD A10-6800KRival
High-End APU
- AMD A10-7850KRival
High-End APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4770RRival
Crystalwell Desktop
- AMD FX-4300Rival
Budget Desktop
Lower power LGA alternative if socketed is needed.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GAlt
Modern APU alternative with much better graphics.
Modern entry-level alternative with superior IPC.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
Budget modern APU alternative.
Intel Core i5-5675R
- AMD A10-7870KRival
Desktop APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5575RRival
Desktop BGA
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-5775RRival
Desktop BGA
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5675CRival
Desktop Socketed
- AMD A8-7670KRival
Desktop APU
- Intel NUC 11 ExtremeAlt
A modern mini PC platform offering vastly superior performance and upgradability.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GAlt
A modern desktop APU that obliterates this chip in every metric.
A cheap, modern CPU that offers much better single and multi-core performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GEAlt
A low-TDP modern alternative for embedded or small form factor builds.
Our Verdict on Each
A pioneering processor that brought console-class integrated graphics to compact PCs via eDRAM.
Best for: Buying a used Intel NUC or iMac with this chip for a retro compact PC.
Read the full reviewA solid embedded processor that brings strong clock speeds and Iris Pro graphics to small form factor systems, though it lacks the overclocking features of its socketed sibling.
Best for: Purchasing a used mini PC with this chip for a cheap media center.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4570R or Intel Core i5-5675R?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4570R comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4570R or Intel Core i5-5675R?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-5675R leads with a gaming performance score of 62/100 among Intel Core i5-4570R and Intel Core i5-5675R.
Do Intel Core i5-4570R and Intel Core i5-5675R use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4570R posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4570R (3,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.