CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4570R vs Intel Core i5-4670T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4570R is a unique quad-core desktop processor launched in June 2013. Unlike standard Haswell chips, it belongs to the Crystalwell family and features a Ball Grid Array (BGA) 1364 socket, meaning it is soldered directly to the motherboard. Its standout feature is the integrated Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics, backed by 128MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM). This made it exceptionally powerful for integrated graphics at the time, capable of playing games like BioShock Infinite at 1080p without a dedicated GPU. Operating at 2.7 GHz base and 3.2 GHz turbo, it prioritizes graphical prowess over raw CPU frequency. With a 65W TDP, it was designed for compact systems like the Intel NUC and certain Apple iMac models. Although its L3 cache is reduced to 4MB, the eDRAM acts as an L4 cache, boosting both graphics and compute performance.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid quad-core performance, though slightly lower clocks than 4670.
Four cores handle office apps and light multitasking with ease.
Gaming
Surprisingly good for an iGPU from 2013, thanks to eDRAM.
Quad cores help with older titles, but HD 4600 limits modern gaming.
Virtualization
Limited by 4 threads.
Can run basic VMs, but lacks Hyper-Threading for better scaling.
Efficiency
Highly optimized for 65W given the graphical power.
Excellent performance-per-watt for a 2013 desktop chip.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- eDRAM doesn't significantly help modern AI workloads
- No AI hardware
- Too slow for modern inference
Content Creation
Gaming
- Can play Bioshock Infinite at 1080p
- Handles older titles at 720p/1080p medium
- Still outdated for modern 3D games
- Integrated graphics too weak
- CPU is fine for legacy games
- Needs a dedicated GPU for real gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Powerful Iris Pro 5200 integrated graphics
- 128MB eDRAM boosts memory bandwidth
- Compact BGA form factor
- Great for mini PCs and NUCs
- Supports Intel Quick Sync for fast video encoding
Cons
- Soldered to motherboard (BGA), no upgrades
- Lower CPU clocks than standard Haswell parts
- Only 4MB L3 cache
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- Difficult to find standalone
Pros
- True 4 physical cores
- Low 45W TDP for a quad-core
- 6MB of L3 cache
- Good for basic home servers
Cons
- No Hyper-Threading
- Low base clock of 2.3 GHz
- Obsolete DDR3 memory
- Locked multiplier
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4570R
- AMD A10-6800KRival
High-End APU
- AMD A10-7850KRival
High-End APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4770RRival
Crystalwell Desktop
- AMD FX-4300Rival
Budget Desktop
Lower power LGA alternative if socketed is needed.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GAlt
Modern APU alternative with much better graphics.
Modern entry-level alternative with superior IPC.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
Budget modern APU alternative.
Intel Core i5-4670T
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4440SRival
Desktop
- AMD A10-6790KRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i7-4770TRival
Desktop
- AMD FX-4300Rival
Desktop
Modern quad-core with massive single-thread improvements.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
Cheap hex-core with great multi-threading.
- Intel Core i5-12400Alt
Excellent modern budget 6-core.
- AMD Ryzen 3 4100Alt
Budget quad-core with modern features.
- Intel Pentium G7400Alt
Modern dual-core for basic office builds.
Our Verdict on Each
A pioneering processor that brought console-class integrated graphics to compact PCs via eDRAM.
Best for: Buying a used Intel NUC or iMac with this chip for a retro compact PC.
Read the full reviewAn impressive engineering feat for its time, delivering true quad-core performance in a 45W package, though outdated now.
Best for: The Core i5-4670T is largely obsolete but retains niche value for budget builders repurposing old hardware. If you already own an LGA 1150 motherboard, finding a used 4670T can be a worthwhile, inexpensive upgrade from a dual-core Pentium or i3, offering true quad-core performance for basic gaming and multitasking. It is particularly attractive if you are building a low-power home server or a pfSense router, as the 45 W TDP keeps electricity costs down. However, do not build a new system around this processor. It lacks modern instructions, DDR4 support, and the single-core performance needed for modern AAA gaming. If purchasing, ensure the price is minimal. For any new build, a modern Intel Core i3 or AMD Ryzen 3 will offer significantly better performance and efficiency out of the box.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4570R or Intel Core i5-4670T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4570R comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4570R or Intel Core i5-4670T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4570R leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Core i5-4570R and Intel Core i5-4670T.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-4670T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4570R (65 W), Intel Core i5-4670T (45 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4570R and Intel Core i5-4670T use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4570R: Intel BGA 1364, Intel Core i5-4670T: Intel Socket 1150 (LGA1150)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4670T posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4570R (3,500), Intel Core i5-4670T (5,800). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.