CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4570R vs Intel Core i5-5675C
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4570R is a unique quad-core desktop processor launched in June 2013. Unlike standard Haswell chips, it belongs to the Crystalwell family and features a Ball Grid Array (BGA) 1364 socket, meaning it is soldered directly to the motherboard. Its standout feature is the integrated Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics, backed by 128MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM). This made it exceptionally powerful for integrated graphics at the time, capable of playing games like BioShock Infinite at 1080p without a dedicated GPU. Operating at 2.7 GHz base and 3.2 GHz turbo, it prioritizes graphical prowess over raw CPU frequency. With a 65W TDP, it was designed for compact systems like the Intel NUC and certain Apple iMac models. Although its L3 cache is reduced to 4MB, the eDRAM acts as an L4 cache, boosting both graphics and compute performance.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid quad-core performance, though slightly lower clocks than 4670.
Quad-core performance at 3.6GHz is snappy for everyday tasks and light creation.
Gaming
Surprisingly good for an iGPU from 2013, thanks to eDRAM.
Iris Pro 6200 allows for solid 1080p gaming on older titles without a dedicated GPU.
Virtualization
Limited by 4 threads.
Handles basic VMs well, though limited by 4 threads.
Efficiency
Highly optimized for 65W given the graphical power.
Broadwell's 14nm process is quite efficient, especially when TDP is configured down.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- eDRAM doesn't significantly help modern AI workloads
- No modern AI hardware features
- DDR3 bandwidth limits execution unit utilization for AI
Content Creation
Gaming
- Can play Bioshock Infinite at 1080p
- Handles older titles at 720p/1080p medium
- Still outdated for modern 3D games
- Comparable to an NVIDIA GT 740 GDDR5
- Can play titles like BioShock Infinite at 1080p High
- eDRAM significantly reduces texture stuttering
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Powerful Iris Pro 5200 integrated graphics
- 128MB eDRAM boosts memory bandwidth
- Compact BGA form factor
- Great for mini PCs and NUCs
- Supports Intel Quick Sync for fast video encoding
Cons
- Soldered to motherboard (BGA), no upgrades
- Lower CPU clocks than standard Haswell parts
- Only 4MB L3 cache
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- Difficult to find standalone
Pros
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- Powerful Iris Pro 6200 integrated graphics
- Uses standard LGA 1150 socket
- Configurable TDP for silent builds
- Includes 128MB L4 eDRAM
Cons
- Limited to DDR3 memory
- Only 4 cores and 4 threads
- Hard to find on the used market
- Lower base clock than some Haswell counterparts
- Socket 1150 is a dead platform
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4570R
- AMD A10-6800KRival
High-End APU
- AMD A10-7850KRival
High-End APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4770RRival
Crystalwell Desktop
- AMD FX-4300Rival
Budget Desktop
Lower power LGA alternative if socketed is needed.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GAlt
Modern APU alternative with much better graphics.
Modern entry-level alternative with superior IPC.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
Budget modern APU alternative.
Intel Core i5-5675C
- AMD A10-7870KRival
Desktop APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4690KRival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-5775CRival
Desktop
- AMD A8-7670KRival
Desktop APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5575RRival
Desktop BGA
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GAlt
A vastly superior modern APU with better CPU and GPU performance.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
A budget modern AM4 alternative with decent Vega graphics.
Modern budget king that obliterates this chip in single-core performance.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A pioneering processor that brought console-class integrated graphics to compact PCs via eDRAM.
Best for: Buying a used Intel NUC or iMac with this chip for a retro compact PC.
Read the full reviewA cult classic desktop CPU that combined an unlocked multiplier with exceptional integrated graphics, making it a unique and highly sought-after part for compact builds.
Best for: Building a retro or niche HTPC where integrated graphics are preferred.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4570R or Intel Core i5-5675C?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-5675C comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4570R or Intel Core i5-5675C?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-5675C leads with a gaming performance score of 65/100 among Intel Core i5-4570R and Intel Core i5-5675C.
Do Intel Core i5-4570R and Intel Core i5-5675C use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4570R: Intel BGA 1364, Intel Core i5-5675C: Intel Socket 1150), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4570R posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4570R (3,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.