CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-3470 vs Intel Core i5-4570

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-3470 is a quad-core desktop processor from the Ivy Bridge family, offering solid mainstream performance with a 3.2 GHz base clock, 3.6 GHz turbo, and 77W TDP for budget-conscious builders.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-3470
4C / 4T3.6 GHz77 W
5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-4570
4C / 4T3.6 GHz84 W
7.2
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop Mainstream
Mid-Range Desktop
Generation
3rd Gen (Ivy Bridge)
4th Gen (Haswell)
Launched
2012
2013
Status
End-of-life
Discontinued
Codename
Ivy Bridge
Haswell
Series
Core i5
Core i5
Family
3rd Generation (Ivy Bridge)
4th Generation (Haswell)
Predecessor
Intel Core i5-2400 (Sandy Bridge)
Intel Core i5-3570
Successor
Intel Core i5-4570 (Haswell)
Intel Core i5-4590

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
TDP
77 W
84 W
Architecture
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Haswell
Process Node
22nm
22nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
32 GB
32 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1150
PCIe Version
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-347025

Quad-core performance handles basic office tasks but struggles with modern multitasking and heavy productivity workloads.

Intel Core i5-4570Best42

Handles basic office and web tasks well, but compilation times and heavy multitasking expose its limits.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-347018

When paired with a modern GPU, the i5-3470 can handle very light or older games, but the lack of threads creates significant bottlenecks in modern titles.

Intel Core i5-4570Best48

Competent with older titles and eSports games, but modern AAA titles expose the four-thread limitation severely.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-347015

Four cores without Hyper-Threading provide basic virtualization capability but are limited by today's standards.

Intel Core i5-4570Best25

VT-x and VT-d are present but four threads severely constrain any practical virtualization workload.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-347035

The 77W TDP was reasonable for 2012 but is inefficient compared to modern quad-core processors that consume half the power.

Intel Core i5-4570Best50

84W TDP for this performance level is unremarkable; modern processors deliver 2-3x the performance at similar power.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-3470Not Supported
  • No AI acceleration hardware
  • Quad-core design insufficient for modern AI workloads
  • Not applicable for this processor generation
Intel Core i5-4570Not Supported
  • No AI acceleration hardware
  • AVX2 available but insufficient for meaningful inference
  • DDR3 bandwidth too low for AI workloads
  • Not suitable for any local AI tasks

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-3470Poor
Basic photo editingSD video editingDocument creation
Intel Core i5-4570Poor
Photoshop (Basic Edits)Lightroom (Photo Culling)Audacity (Audio Editing)Handbrake (Slow H.264 Encoding)Canva (Web-Based Design)

Gaming

Intel Core i5-3470Poor
  • Four cores without Hyper-Threading limit frame rates in modern games
  • PCIe 3.0 x16 provides adequate GPU bandwidth
  • HD 2500 integrated graphics are insufficient for gaming
  • CPU bottleneck in modern AAA titles even with mid-range GPUs
Intel Core i5-4570Fair
  • Capable with eSports titles like CS:GO and Dota 2
  • Bottlenecks mid-range and above modern GPUs
  • DDR3 memory limits performance in open-world games
  • No Hyper-Threading reduces 1% low frame rates
  • Best paired with GTX 1060 or slower for balanced performance

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Moderate
Workstations
None
Low
Content Creation
Low
Low
Virtualization
Low
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

Office Productivity
Adequate
Good
Web Browsing
Adequate
Light Gaming
Poor
Media Consumption
Good
Multitasking
Fair
1080p Gaming with dGPU
Fair
Home Media Center
Good
Light Programming
Fair
Video Editing
Poor

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-3470

Pros

  • Four physical cores for mainstream multi-threaded workloads
  • 6MB shared L3 cache improves performance over dual-core models
  • PCIe 3.0 support for full-bandwidth GPU connectivity
  • vPro support for enterprise management
  • Affordable on the used market for legacy builds

Cons

  • No Hyper-Threading limits multi-threaded performance
  • 77W TDP is inefficient by modern standards
  • HD 2500 integrated graphics are very weak
  • LGA 1155 platform is end-of-life with no upgrade path
  • No Windows 11 support
  • DDR3 memory is obsolete
Intel Core i5-4570

Pros

  • Was excellent value at launch for mainstream users
  • TSX and TXT support uncommon in this price segment
  • Good turbo boost delta of 400 MHz
  • Wide compatibility with H81 through Z97 chipsets
  • Low used-market pricing makes it viable for repairs

Cons

  • Only 4 threads without Hyper-Threading
  • Locked multiplier eliminates overclocking
  • 84W TDP is inefficient by modern standards
  • DDR3 memory platform is obsolete
  • No longer receives security microcode updates
  • TSX was disabled on most systems due to errata
  • Significantly outperformed by modern i3 processors

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-3470

  • AMD FX-6300

    Desktop Mainstream

    Rival
  • AMD FX-8350

    Desktop Enthusiast

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-3570K

    Desktop Enthusiast

    Rival
    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD A10-5800K

    Desktop Mainstream

    Rival
  • Intel Core i3-3220

    Desktop Budget

    Rival
  • Haswell successor with AVX2 support and slightly better IPC.

    Compare head-to-head
  • Modern 4-thread processor with dramatically better IPC, DDR4/DDR5, and platform features.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 5 5600
    Alt

    Six-core, twelve-thread modern processor at similar used pricing with vastly superior performance.

  • Intel Core i5-12400F
    Alt

    Modern 6-core budget processor that outperforms the i5-3470 in every metric at low cost.

  • AMD Ryzen 3 4100
    Alt

    Budget quad-core with SMT on a modern platform with DDR4 support.

Intel Core i5-4570

Our Verdict on Each

The i5-3470 was a reliable mainstream quad-core in 2012, but its lack of Hyper-Threading, outdated platform, and DDR3 memory make it obsolete for modern builds.

Best for: Maintaining an existing legacy system for basic office or web tasks

Read the full review

A solid mid-range performer that was the go-to recommendation for mainstream PC builders in 2013-2014, but its four-thread limitation and DDR3 platform make it impractical for modern workloads.

Best for: Replacing a failed CPU in an existing LGA 1150 system where motherboard reuse is necessary

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-3470 or Intel Core i5-4570?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4570 comes out ahead with a score of 7.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-3470 or Intel Core i5-4570?

For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4570 leads with a gaming performance score of 48/100 among Intel Core i5-3470 and Intel Core i5-4570.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i5-3470 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-3470 (77 W), Intel Core i5-4570 (84 W).

Do Intel Core i5-3470 and Intel Core i5-4570 use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-3470: LGA 1155, Intel Core i5-4570: LGA 1150), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-3470 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-3470 (7,100), Intel Core i5-4570 (4,310). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.