CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-3360M vs Intel Core i3-10110U
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-3360M is a high-end dual-core mobile processor released in June 2012 as part of the Ivy Bridge lineup. Built on a 22nm manufacturing process, it represents the top-tier of the standard-voltage Core i5 mobile family for its generation. Operating at a base clock of 2.8 GHz and boosting up to 3.5 GHz, it delivers robust single-threaded performance that rivals some lower-tier Core i7 models of the same era. The processor features two cores and four threads, facilitated by Hyper-Threading technology. It maintains a 35-watt TDP, ensuring compatibility with standard laptop cooling solutions. The inclusion of 3MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, while the integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics handle multimedia tasks and light gaming. This chip was typically reserved for premium 14-inch and 15-inch laptops where a balance of processing power and mobility was paramount. Today, it is considered a legacy product, but it remains a testament to the enduring performance of Intel's 22nm architecture.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Single-core speed keeps legacy apps feeling snappy.
Can handle a single Word document or spreadsheet, but opening multiple browser tabs alongside office apps will cause severe slowdowns.
Gaming
Handles older 3D games better than lower-tier i5s due to high clocks.
The basic UHD graphics cannot handle any modern games. Even older e-sports titles will struggle at low settings.
Virtualization
Can run a basic VM but limited by 2 cores.
2 cores and 4 threads are fundamentally inadequate for running virtual machines.
Efficiency
Pushes the 35W limit hard under load.
While 25W is low, modern ARM chips and newer Intel chips do far more work per watt.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Slow for inference
- No AI hardware
- No AVX-512
- Cannot handle AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4000 is still too weak for modern games
- Good for Source engine games (CS:GO, TF2)
- Requires low resolutions (720p)
- No dedicated gaming capability
- Integrated UHD graphics are severely limited
- CPU bottlenecks even the lightest games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Highest clocks among standard-voltage Ivy Bridge i5s
- Strong single-core performance for its era
- Supports Intel vPro and TXT
- 35W TDP is manageable
- Includes AES-NI
Cons
- Only 2 cores / 4 threads
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- No official Windows 11 support
- Weak integrated graphics
- Often soldered (BGA) preventing upgrades
Pros
- Very cheap on the used market
- Low 25W power draw
- Supports both DDR3L and DDR4
- 4.1 GHz boost provides okay single-task speed
- Sufficient for basic offline typing
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- 4MB L3 cache is very small
- End-of-Life and no longer manufactured
- UHD graphics are extremely weak
- Struggles with modern web applications
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-3360M
- Intel Core i7-3520MRival
High-End Mobile
- AMD A10-4600MRival
Mobile APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-3320MRival
Mobile CPU
- Intel Core i7-3610QMRival
Quad-Core Mobile
- AMD FX-8150 (Mobile)Rival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i5-4200HAlt
Haswell successor with better IPC.
- Intel Core i7-3540MAlt
Even faster Ivy Bridge dual-core.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250UAlt
Modern budget alternative with vastly superior iGPU.
Modern budget alternative with much better efficiency.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Pentium Gold 4417UAlt
Modern alternative for basic office tasks.
Intel Core i3-10110U
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Mobile
- AMD Athlon 300URival
Budget Mobile
- Intel Pentium Gold 5405URival
Entry Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7cRival
Budget Mobile
- MediaTek Kompanio 500Rival
Budget Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300UAlt
Offers 4 cores and 8 threads, completely solving the multitasking issues of the 10110U.
11th-gen successor with much better single-core performance and Iris Xe graphics.
Compare head-to-headA massive leap in performance and efficiency for thin-and-light laptops.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
If buying a premium laptop, the M1 offers exponentially better battery life and performance.
Compare head-to-head - Any Modern ARM ChromebookAlt
For basic web browsing, a cheap ARM Chromebook will feel faster and last longer on a charge.
Our Verdict on Each
The fastest standard-voltage Ivy Bridge i5, offering i7-like single-core speeds for its time, but obsolete today.
Best for: If you encounter a laptop with the Intel Core i5-3360M today, it should only be considered for specific legacy or budget purposes. As a 3rd-generation Core processor, it lacks support for modern connectivity like USB 3.1 Gen 2 or NVMe SSDs natively, and it does not officially support Windows 11. However, for users looking to revive an older ThinkPad or Latitude for basic typing, offline coding, or as a home server, the 3360M offers surprisingly capable performance. Its 3.5 GHz turbo boost means it can still handle single-threaded applications reasonably well. Ensure the laptop has an SSD and at least 8GB of DDR3 RAM to avoid bottlenecks. Do not buy this processor for modern gaming, video editing, or as a primary work machine. It is best suited for tinkerers, Linux enthusiasts, or those needing a cheap, disposable secondary device.
Read the full reviewObsolete for modern use. Its 2 cores struggle heavily with today's web applications, making it suitable only for the lightest, most basic computing tasks.
Best for: You should avoid purchasing any new laptop containing the Intel Core i3-10110U in today's market. With only 2 cores and 4 threads, this processor struggles heavily with modern web browsing habits, where having dozens of tabs open alongside streaming video or communication apps will quickly saturate its processing capability. If you are looking at the used or refurbished market, laptops with this chip should only be considered if they are exceptionally cheap (under $150) and if your usage is strictly limited to lightweight tasks like writing documents, watching offline video, or basic web surfing. For a new budget laptop, even the most basic ARM-based Chromebook or an AMD Ryzen 3 powered Windows laptop will provide a vastly superior, longer-lasting experience due to having more CPU cores and significantly better integrated graphics. Do not buy this chip for any form of multitasking.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-3360M or Intel Core i3-10110U?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-3360M comes out ahead with a score of 4.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-3360M or Intel Core i3-10110U?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-3360M leads with a gaming performance score of 20/100 among Intel Core i5-3360M and Intel Core i3-10110U.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-10110U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-3360M (35 W), Intel Core i3-10110U (25 W).
Do Intel Core i5-3360M and Intel Core i3-10110U use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-3360M: Intel BGA 1023, Intel Core i3-10110U: BGA 1440), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-3360M posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-3360M (2,900), Intel Core i3-10110U (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.