CPU Comparison
Core i5-3317U vs Intel Core i5-3360M
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-3317U is an ultra-low voltage dual-core mobile processor launched in June 2012, specifically engineered for the burgeoning ultrabook market. Built on the Ivy Bridge architecture, it operates at a base frequency of 1.7 GHz and can dynamically boost up to 2.6 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost 2.0. With a remarkably low thermal design power of just 17 watts, it prioritizes battery longevity and thermal efficiency, enabling fanless designs and extremely thin laptop profiles. The processor supports Hyper-Threading, managing four threads across its two physical cores to ensure competent multitasking. It includes 3 MB of L3 cache and integrates Intel HD Graphics 4000, delivering sufficient graphical performance for high-definition media playback and casual gaming. Designed for the BGA 1023 socket, it is permanently soldered, emphasizing its role in highly integrated, space-constrained mobile computing devices where thickness must be minimized.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Struggles with heavy multitasking but fine for single-app usage.
Single-core speed keeps legacy apps feeling snappy.
Gaming
Cannot run modern 3D games; restricted to very light 2D indie titles.
Handles older 3D games better than lower-tier i5s due to high clocks.
Virtualization
Lacks VT-d support and core count for effective virtualization.
Can run a basic VM but limited by 2 cores.
Efficiency
Good efficiency for 2012, though modern 7W chips are vastly faster.
Pushes the 35W limit hard under load.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Insufficient compute for modern AI tasks
- No AI hardware
- Slow for inference
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4000 maxes out at 1050 MHz
- Dual-core bottleneck
- Lacks AVX2
- HD 4000 is still too weak for modern games
- Good for Source engine games (CS:GO, TF2)
- Requires low resolutions (720p)
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very low 17W TDP
- Enabled thin ultrabook designs
- Good battery life for its era
- Decent burst performance
- Hardware video decoding
Cons
- Soldered to motherboard, no upgrades
- Severely underpowered for modern web
- No Windows 11 support
- Lacks VT-d virtualization
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
Pros
- Highest clocks among standard-voltage Ivy Bridge i5s
- Strong single-core performance for its era
- Supports Intel vPro and TXT
- 35W TDP is manageable
- Includes AES-NI
Cons
- Only 2 cores / 4 threads
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- No official Windows 11 support
- Weak integrated graphics
- Often soldered (BGA) preventing upgrades
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i5-3317U
- AMD A8-4555MRival
Mobile Ultra-Low Power
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-3517URival
Mobile Ultra-Low Power
- Intel Core i3-3217URival
Mobile Ultra-Low Power
- AMD A6-4455MRival
Mobile Ultra-Low Power
- Intel Core i5-3427URival
Mobile Ultra-Low Power
- AMD A10-4655MAlt
Better integrated graphics in the same TDP class.
- Intel Pentium 987Alt
Lower performance, cheaper alternative for basic tasks.
Intel Core i5-3360M
- Intel Core i7-3520MRival
High-End Mobile
- AMD A10-4600MRival
Mobile APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-3320MRival
Mobile CPU
- Intel Core i7-3610QMRival
Quad-Core Mobile
- AMD FX-8150 (Mobile)Rival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i5-4200HAlt
Haswell successor with better IPC.
- Intel Core i7-3540MAlt
Even faster Ivy Bridge dual-core.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250UAlt
Modern budget alternative with vastly superior iGPU.
Modern budget alternative with much better efficiency.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Pentium Gold 4417UAlt
Modern alternative for basic office tasks.
Our Verdict on Each
A pioneering ultra-low voltage CPU that enabled the ultrabook era, but its dual-core performance is severely lacking by modern standards.
Best for: Using an old ultrabook as a lightweight Linux terminal.
Read the full reviewThe fastest standard-voltage Ivy Bridge i5, offering i7-like single-core speeds for its time, but obsolete today.
Best for: If you encounter a laptop with the Intel Core i5-3360M today, it should only be considered for specific legacy or budget purposes. As a 3rd-generation Core processor, it lacks support for modern connectivity like USB 3.1 Gen 2 or NVMe SSDs natively, and it does not officially support Windows 11. However, for users looking to revive an older ThinkPad or Latitude for basic typing, offline coding, or as a home server, the 3360M offers surprisingly capable performance. Its 3.5 GHz turbo boost means it can still handle single-threaded applications reasonably well. Ensure the laptop has an SSD and at least 8GB of DDR3 RAM to avoid bottlenecks. Do not buy this processor for modern gaming, video editing, or as a primary work machine. It is best suited for tinkerers, Linux enthusiasts, or those needing a cheap, disposable secondary device.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i5-3317U or Intel Core i5-3360M?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i5-3317U comes out ahead with a score of 5.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Core i5-3317U or Intel Core i5-3360M?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-3360M leads with a gaming performance score of 20/100 among Core i5-3317U and Intel Core i5-3360M.
Which uses less power?
The Core i5-3317U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i5-3317U (17 W), Intel Core i5-3360M (35 W).
Do Core i5-3317U and Intel Core i5-3360M use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1023 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-3360M posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i5-3317U (2,000), Intel Core i5-3360M (2,900). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.