CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Core i7-1195G7
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-1155G7 is a mid-cycle refresh of the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-U mobile processor lineup, released in May 2021. Built on the 10nm SuperFin process with Willow Cove architecture, it features 4 cores and 8 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.5 GHz and boosting up to 4.5 GHz. This refresh offered a slight frequency bump over the original i5-1145G7 to maintain competitiveness against AMD's Ryzen 5000 mobile series. A notable improvement in this SKU is the doubling of usable PCIe 4.0 lanes to 16, allowing OEMs to connect high-speed NVMe storage and discrete components simultaneously without bottlenecking. It integrates Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 80 Execution Units, providing robust integrated graphics for thin-and-light laptops. With a configurable TDP of 12W to 28W, it remains a highly capable processor for everyday productivity, media consumption, and light creative workloads, though it has been superseded by Intel's 12th Gen Alder Lake series.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Excellent single-thread speed makes office apps and browsing feel instant.
The 5.0 GHz boost provides unmatched snappiness for daily tasks.
Gaming
Iris Xe 80EU performs well in older titles and esports at 1080p Low settings.
Excellent when paired with a discrete GPU due to 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes.
Virtualization
Can run a light VM, but 4 cores limit parallel virtualization.
Good for light VMs, but 4 cores limit heavy virtualization.
Efficiency
Good power efficiency, though surpassed by newer 10nm and TSMC nodes.
Pushing 5.0 GHz on 10nm can generate significant heat in thin chassis.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel DL Boost for INT8
- GNA 2.0 for audio AI
- No dedicated NPU
- DLBoost present
- No dedicated NPU
- Fast single-core speeds help CPU AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- Iris Xe 80EU is capable but bottlenecked by 4 cores
- Performance depends heavily on dual-channel memory
- Supports modern graphics APIs
- 16 PCIe lanes prevent dGPU bottlenecks
- Iris Xe is excellent for casual gaming
- CPU bottleneck possible in multi-threaded games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes provide good expansion flexibility
- Strong single-thread performance up to 4.5 GHz
- Excellent integrated Iris Xe graphics
- Good power efficiency for battery life
- Hardware AV1 video decoding
Cons
- Only 4 cores limit multi-threaded performance
- Surpassed by 12th Gen Alder Lake hybrid architecture
- Locked multiplier
- No ECC memory support
- End-of-life is approaching as newer generations dominate
Pros
- 5.0 GHz single-core turbo
- 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- Excellent Iris Xe graphics
- Strong single-thread performance
Cons
- Only 4 cores
- End-of-life platform
- Can run hot at 5.0 GHz
- Expensive at launch
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-1155G7
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600URival
Consumer Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700URival
Consumer Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Consumer Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Rival
Consumer Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2Rival
Consumer Mobile
12th Gen successor with 12 cores (4P+8E) offering massive multi-core gains.
Compare head-to-headOlder but nearly identical single-thread performance if PCIe lanes aren't needed.
Compare head-to-head- Apple M1 (MacBook Air)Alt
Offers superior battery life and efficiency for basic office work.
A newer 12th Gen i3 that often matches this i5 in multi-core while being cheaper.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-1195G7
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11900HRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Alt
Cheaper and nearly identical for non-gaming use.
Newer 12th Gen with more cores.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Superior efficiency and multi-core.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 5 5600HAlt
Better budget gaming performance.
Our Verdict on Each
A solid refresh that fixed the PCIe lane limitation of the original Tiger Lake i5. It offers great single-thread performance and integrated graphics, though 4 cores show their age in 2024.
Best for: Purchasing a discounted 2021-era laptop for standard school or office work.
Read the full reviewA potent refresh of Tiger Lake, offering exceptional single-core speeds and improved PCIe expansion for high-end mobile devices.
Best for: Buying a used premium ultrabook or thin-and-light laptop.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-1155G7 or Core i7-1195G7?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1195G7 comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-1155G7 or Core i7-1195G7?
For gaming, the Core i7-1195G7 leads with a gaming performance score of 80/100 among Intel Core i5-1155G7 and Core i7-1195G7.
Do Intel Core i5-1155G7 and Core i7-1195G7 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-1155G7: Intel BGA 1449, Core i7-1195G7: BGA 1449), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-1195G7 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-1155G7 (0), Core i7-1195G7 (7,200). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.