CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-1145G7E vs Intel Core i5-8365UE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-1145G7E is a specialized 11th Generation Tiger Lake-U processor tailored for embedded and edge computing applications. Released in late 2020, this quad-core, eight-thread CPU leverages Intel's 10nm SuperFin process and Willow Cove architecture to deliver a balance of performance and power efficiency. Operating at a base frequency of 1.5 GHz with the ability to boost up to 4.1 GHz, it is designed to handle intermittent compute spikes common in industrial environments. The 'E' suffix denotes its extended lifecycle support, ensuring availability for long-term deployments. With a configurable TDP ranging from 12W to 28W, system designers have the flexibility to optimize for either fanless low-power operation or higher sustained performance. It also features Iris Xe Graphics with 80 Execution Units, providing capable graphical and parallel processing power for edge inference, digital signage, and IoT workloads. This makes it a versatile choice for modern embedded systems requiring robust x86 compatibility.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Strong single-core performance ensures snappy response times in embedded applications and control software.
Strong single-core performance for edge applications.
Gaming
Not intended for gaming, though integrated Iris Xe can handle legacy or lightweight titles at low settings.
Not designed for gaming; only basic 2D acceleration.
Virtualization
Capable of running lightweight virtual machines for edge consolidation, though limited to 4 cores.
Good for lightweight containerized workloads.
Efficiency
Excellent performance-per-watt, especially when configured at the 12W configurable TDP limit.
Excellent performance-per-watt for fanless designs.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Includes Intel GNA 2.0 for low-power AI inference
- DL Boost accelerates INT8 operations
- Suitable for edge vision and audio processing
- No dedicated AI hardware.
- Suitable for basic edge inference via CPU.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated graphics are sufficient for UI rendering but not 3D gaming
- Not targeted at consumer gaming markets
- Lacks PCIe lanes for external GPU expansion
- Not intended for gaming.
- UHD 620 is sufficient for UI rendering only.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 10nm SuperFin process offers excellent efficiency
- Extended lifecycle availability for industrial deployments
- Configurable TDP provides thermal flexibility
- Strong single-thread performance via Willow Cove architecture
- Integrated Iris Xe graphics with 80 EUs
Cons
- Limited to only 4 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- Does not support ECC memory
- Locked multiplier prevents core overclocking
- High cost compared to consumer mobile counterparts
- BGA package means it cannot be user-upgraded
Pros
- Long-term embedded availability
- vPro for remote management
- Good performance-per-watt
- Supports dual-channel DDR4
Cons
- Only 4 cores
- Basic integrated graphics
- Older 14nm process
- Not for consumer use
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-1145G7E
- AMD Ryzen 5 Embedded V2546Rival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Atom x6425ERival
Embedded Low-Power
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650URival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1185G7ERival
Embedded Mobile
- NXP i.MX 8QuadMaxRival
Embedded ARM
Identical architecture but adds ECC memory support for critical data integrity.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i5-1155G7EAlt
Slightly newer embedded variant with higher clock speeds (if available).
- Intel N100Alt
More modern and cost-effective for lower-power edge devices, though with fewer threads.
- AMD Ryzen 3 Embedded V1605BAlt
Older generation but offers more cores for multi-threaded edge workloads.
Intel Core i5-8365UE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BRival
Embedded Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-8665UERival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Atom x7-E3950Rival
Embedded Low Power
- AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606GRival
Embedded Low Power
- Intel Celeron 4305UERival
Embedded Budget
Better 10nm architecture and Xe graphics.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2000Alt
More cores and better efficiency.
- Intel Atom x6425EAlt
Lower power alternative for simpler tasks.
- AMD Ryzen Embedded R2545Alt
Strong embedded alternative.
Our Verdict on Each
A highly capable embedded processor offering an excellent balance of single-thread performance and power efficiency, though its limited PCIe lanes may restrict expansion capabilities in complex edge servers.
Best for: Designing a long-life embedded system requiring x86 compatibility and low power consumption.
Read the full reviewA highly reliable embedded processor offering long-term availability, vPro manageability, and solid performance for industrial applications.
Best for: Developing new industrial IoT or edge computing devices.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-1145G7E or Intel Core i5-8365UE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-1145G7E comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-1145G7E or Intel Core i5-8365UE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-1145G7E leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Core i5-1145G7E and Intel Core i5-8365UE.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-8365UE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-1145G7E (28 W), Intel Core i5-8365UE (15 W).
Do Intel Core i5-1145G7E and Intel Core i5-8365UE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-1145G7E: Intel BGA 1449, Intel Core i5-8365UE: BGA 1528), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-8365UE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-1145G7E (0), Intel Core i5-8365UE (6,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.