CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-1195G7
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a standard consumer mobile processor released in late 2020 as part of the 11th Gen Tiger Lake lineup. Built on the 10nm SuperFin process, it features 4 cores and 8 threads based on the Willow Cove microarchitecture. Designed primarily for thin-and-light laptops, it operates at a base frequency of 2.6 GHz and can boost up to 4.4 GHz. The chip features a 28W default TDP, though it is often configured lower by OEMs to fit 15W ultrabook thermal limits. It integrates Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 80 Execution Units, delivering a massive leap in integrated graphical performance compared to previous generations, enabling smooth 1080p gaming and rapid hardware video encoding. With 8MB of L3 cache and support for PCIe 4.0 (though limited to 4 lanes), it offered excellent single-threaded responsiveness for everyday productivity, content consumption, and light creative workloads, though it is now superseded by newer generations.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
High single-thread performance makes everyday tasks and web browsing feel extremely snappy.
The 5.0 GHz boost provides unmatched snappiness for daily tasks.
Gaming
Iris Xe 80EU allows for playable framerates in older or esports titles at 1080p Low, a massive step up from UHD graphics.
Excellent when paired with a discrete GPU due to 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes.
Virtualization
Can run basic VMs for development, but 4 cores limit heavy virtualization workloads.
Good for light VMs, but 4 cores limit heavy virtualization.
Efficiency
Good efficiency at 15W, though 10nm SuperFin is slightly surpassed by newer nodes.
Pushing 5.0 GHz on 10nm can generate significant heat in thin chassis.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel DL Boost for INT8
- GNA 2.0 for background noise cancellation
- Suitable for consumer AI features like background blur
- DLBoost present
- No dedicated NPU
- Fast single-core speeds help CPU AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- Can play CS:GO, Valorant, and League of Legends at 1080p
- Driver support is mature
- Performance heavily depends on laptop memory configuration (dual-channel is essential)
- 16 PCIe lanes prevent dGPU bottlenecks
- Iris Xe is excellent for casual gaming
- CPU bottleneck possible in multi-threaded games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent single-thread performance for everyday tasks
- Iris Xe 80EU provides best-in-class integrated graphics at launch
- Good power efficiency for battery life
- Hardware AV1 video decoding
- Native Thunderbolt 4 support (via platform)
Cons
- Only 4 cores and 8 threads limits multi-threaded headroom
- Limited to 4 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- End-of-life status means no further BIOS/feature updates
- Does not support ECC memory
- Surpassed by 12th Gen Alder Lake-U in efficiency and performance
Pros
- 5.0 GHz single-core turbo
- 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- Excellent Iris Xe graphics
- Strong single-thread performance
Cons
- Only 4 cores
- End-of-life platform
- Can run hot at 5.0 GHz
- Expensive at launch
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-1145G7
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500URival
Consumer Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 4700URival
Consumer Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Consumer Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Rival
Consumer Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2Rival
Consumer Mobile
12th Gen successor with hybrid architecture (P+E cores) offering better multi-core performance.
Compare head-to-headSlightly lower clocks but nearly identical performance, often found in cheaper laptops.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600UAlt
Superior Zen 3 architecture with more cores and better battery life.
A newer 12th gen i3 that matches or beats this i5 in multi-core while being cheaper.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-1195G7
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11900HRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Alt
Cheaper and nearly identical for non-gaming use.
Newer 12th Gen with more cores.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Superior efficiency and multi-core.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 5 5600HAlt
Better budget gaming performance.
Our Verdict on Each
A solid 11th gen mobile chip that brought significant IPC and graphics improvements to ultrabooks. However, it is now end-of-life and surpassed by 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen alternatives.
Best for: Buying a heavily discounted used laptop from 2021 for basic office work or student needs.
Read the full reviewA potent refresh of Tiger Lake, offering exceptional single-core speeds and improved PCIe expansion for high-end mobile devices.
Best for: Buying a used premium ultrabook or thin-and-light laptop.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-1145G7 or Core i7-1195G7?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1195G7 comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-1145G7 or Core i7-1195G7?
For gaming, the Core i7-1195G7 leads with a gaming performance score of 80/100 among Intel Core i5-1145G7 and Core i7-1195G7.
Do Intel Core i5-1145G7 and Core i7-1195G7 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-1145G7: Intel BGA 1449, Core i7-1195G7: BGA 1449), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-1195G7 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-1145G7 (0), Core i7-1195G7 (7,200). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.