CPU Comparison
Apple M4 vs Intel Core 5 315
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Apple M4 is an ARM-based system-on-chip built on TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, pairing up to 10 CPU cores (4 performance + 6 efficiency) with up to a 10-core GPU, a 16-core Neural Engine, and a new display engine. It introduces hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading to iPad and Mac, and adds AV1 decode in the media engine, targeting high-performance, power-efficient workloads across tablets, laptops, and desktops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Very fast single-thread performance and strong multi-core scaling within its power envelope, suitable for demanding productivity workloads on macOS and iPadOS.
Handles standard office suites flawlessly, but the 6-thread limit causes slowdowns in heavy spreadsheet calculations or large file processing.
Gaming
While Xe3 graphics are powerful, the single-channel memory bottleneck severely limits frame rates in modern 3D games.
Virtualization
Can run light VMs for development or testing, but limited core count and memory bandwidth constrain heavier workloads.
Efficiency
High performance-per-watt; Apple claims the same performance as M2 using roughly half the power in tested workloads, and M4 devices typically run cool and quiet.
The 3nm compute tile and lack of SMT result in class-leading performance-per-watt for everyday tasks.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16-core Neural Engine delivers up to 38 TOPS for on-device AI.
- Next-generation ML accelerators are integrated into both performance and efficiency CPU cores.
- Hardware-accelerated AI features in OS and apps (e.g., Live Captions, subject isolation) benefit from the NPU and unified memory bandwidth.
- Combined GPU and NPU resources make M4 well suited for client-side inference and media AI workloads.
- Meets the 40+ TOPS requirement when including CPU and GPU contributions
- NPU 5 is highly efficient for sustained AI tasks
- Excellent for local Copilot+ PC features
Content Creation
Gaming
- The integrated GPU supports modern features like hardware ray tracing and mesh shading.
- On macOS, gaming performance is constrained by title availability and reliance on translation/emulation layers.
- Playability in AAA titles at 1080p is generally limited to low or medium settings on the base M4.
- M4 iPad Pro focuses more on high-end creative and pro apps than AAA gaming libraries.
- Single-channel memory heavily restricts iGPU bandwidth
- Xe3 architecture shows promise for esports titles at low settings
- Not intended as a gaming processor
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Industry-leading performance-per-watt in thin-and-light devices.
- Strong single-core performance and fast responsiveness.
- 16-core Neural Engine with high TOPS for on-device AI.
- Hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading in the GPU.
- Media engine with AV1 decode for efficient streaming.
- Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and high-bandwidth unified memory on Mac implementations.
- Fanless implementations (e.g., iPad Pro) stay cool and quiet under typical use.
Cons
- Apple does not publish clock speeds, TDP, or detailed cache specs.
- Unified memory is not expandable beyond the configured capacity at purchase.
- No traditional socket or user-accessible PCIe lanes for add-in cards.
- Gaming on macOS remains constrained by software compatibility.
- Some configurations implement fewer CPU or GPU cores (e.g., 8- or 9-core CPU variants).
Pros
- Class-leading 3nm power efficiency
- Strong 35 TOPS combined AI performance
- Modern Xe3 integrated graphics architecture
- Extremely low 15W base power draw
- High-speed LPDDR5X memory support
Cons
- Restricted to single-channel memory only
- No Hyper-Threading limits multi-tasking
- Only six PCIe 4.0 lanes available
- Base 6 threads will struggle with heavy workloads
- Priced at a premium $340 for a 6-thread chip
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M4
- Compare head-to-headApple M3Rival
SoC
- Compare head-to-headApple M4 ProRival
SoC
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
SoC
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile CPU
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HRival
Mobile CPU
Intel Core 5 315
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340Rival
Mobile Efficiency
- Compare head-to-headApple M4Rival
Premium Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X PlusRival
ARM Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 8540URival
Mainstream Mobile
- MediaTek Kompanio 1400TRival
Chromebook / ARM Mobile
- Intel Core 7 335Alt
Offers more P-Cores, multi-channel memory support, and higher thread counts for heavier workloads.
- Apple M4 Base ModelAlt
Superior unified memory architecture and unmatched single-thread efficiency in a similar power bracket.
- Intel Core 5 225Alt
A potential budget alternative if the Xe3 graphics and 3nm process are not strictly required.
Our Verdict on Each
The M4 raises the bar for efficiency and single-thread performance while delivering stronger multi-core scaling and a much more capable Neural Engine. It is an excellent fit for iPad Pro and Mac users who want fast, cool, and quiet operation, but platform constraints on some devices and the absence of expandable memory/PCIe remain trade-offs.
Best for: Buying an iPad Pro for creative pro workflows, or a compact Mac (Mac mini/iMac) for efficient everyday performance and light-to-medium content creation.
Read the full reviewA highly efficient 3nm mobile chip that excels in battery life and AI tasks, though the lack of Hyper-Threading and single-channel memory limit its heavy multi-threaded potential.
Best for: Purchasing an ultra-portable laptop for everyday tasks, office work, and AI features where battery life is the top priority.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M4 or Intel Core 5 315?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M4 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M4 or Intel Core 5 315?
For gaming, the Intel Core 5 315 leads with a gaming performance score of 45/100 among Apple M4 and Intel Core 5 315.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core 5 315 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core 5 315 (15 W).
Which has more cores?
The Apple M4 has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M4 (10 cores), Intel Core 5 315 (6 cores).