CPU Comparison
Apple M4 vs Apple M5
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Apple M4 is an ARM-based system-on-chip built on TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, pairing up to 10 CPU cores (4 performance + 6 efficiency) with up to a 10-core GPU, a 16-core Neural Engine, and a new display engine. It introduces hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading to iPad and Mac, and adds AV1 decode in the media engine, targeting high-performance, power-efficient workloads across tablets, laptops, and desktops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16-core Neural Engine delivers up to 38 TOPS for on-device AI.
- Next-generation ML accelerators are integrated into both performance and efficiency CPU cores.
- Hardware-accelerated AI features in OS and apps (e.g., Live Captions, subject isolation) benefit from the NPU and unified memory bandwidth.
- Combined GPU and NPU resources make M4 well suited for client-side inference and media AI workloads.
- 16-core Neural Engine improves inference latency for on-device models
- GPU Neural Accelerators target AI graphics workloads like image generation
- Efficient AI execution suitable to Apple Intelligence and local LLMs within memory constraints
Content Creation
Gaming
- The integrated GPU supports modern features like hardware ray tracing and mesh shading.
- On macOS, gaming performance is constrained by title availability and reliance on translation/emulation layers.
- Playability in AAA titles at 1080p is generally limited to low or medium settings on the base M4.
- M4 iPad Pro focuses more on high-end creative and pro apps than AAA gaming libraries.
- Hardware-accelerated ray tracing supported
- Best suited for casual to mid-tier gaming at reasonable settings
- Performance constrained by integrated GPU and thermal limits in fanless chassis
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Industry-leading performance-per-watt in thin-and-light devices.
- Strong single-core performance and fast responsiveness.
- 16-core Neural Engine with high TOPS for on-device AI.
- Hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading in the GPU.
- Media engine with AV1 decode for efficient streaming.
- Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and high-bandwidth unified memory on Mac implementations.
- Fanless implementations (e.g., iPad Pro) stay cool and quiet under typical use.
Cons
- Apple does not publish clock speeds, TDP, or detailed cache specs.
- Unified memory is not expandable beyond the configured capacity at purchase.
- No traditional socket or user-accessible PCIe lanes for add-in cards.
- Gaming on macOS remains constrained by software compatibility.
- Some configurations implement fewer CPU or GPU cores (e.g., 8- or 9-core CPU variants).
Pros
- Strong power efficiency thanks to 3nm process
- Hybrid CPU design balances snappy responsiveness and battery life
- GPU with per-core Neural Accelerators improves AI graphics performance
- 16-core Neural Engine speeds up on-device AI and Apple Intelligence
- Unified memory up to 32GB simplifies configuration for most users
- Hardware-accelerated ray tracing adds realism to supported games and apps
- Fanless-capable in MacBook Air and iPad Pro designs
Cons
- Unified memory ceiling at 32GB limits very large pro workloads
- No user-overclocking or socket-upgrade path
- Apple does not disclose clock speeds or cache sizes publicly
- Multi-core gains over M4 are incremental rather than transformative
- External GPU support is limited by Thunderbolt 4 bandwidth
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M4
- Compare head-to-headApple M3Rival
SoC
- Compare head-to-headApple M4 ProRival
SoC
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
SoC
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile CPU
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HRival
Mobile CPU
Apple M5
- Compare head-to-headApple M4Rival
Premium Tablet/Laptop SoC
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Windows Laptop SoC
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HRival
Thin-and-Light Laptop CPU
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Thin-and-Light Laptop CPU
- MediaTek Dimensity 9400Rival
Premium Tablet SoC
- Alt
More CPU/GPU cores, higher memory bandwidth and capacity for demanding pro workloads.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
Maximized core counts and memory bandwidth for heavy 3D, video, and AI workloads.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
The M4 raises the bar for efficiency and single-thread performance while delivering stronger multi-core scaling and a much more capable Neural Engine. It is an excellent fit for iPad Pro and Mac users who want fast, cool, and quiet operation, but platform constraints on some devices and the absence of expandable memory/PCIe remain trade-offs.
Best for: Buying an iPad Pro for creative pro workflows, or a compact Mac (Mac mini/iMac) for efficient everyday performance and light-to-medium content creation.
Read the full reviewThe base M5 balances meaningful gains in AI graphics and efficiency with modest bumps in CPU throughput, making it a compelling upgrade for M1/M2 users especially on fanless designs like MacBook Air and iPad Pro.
Best for: Upgrading from M1/M2 MacBook Air or earlier iPad Pro, and prioritizing battery life and on-device AI in a portable device.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M4 or Apple M5?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M4 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M4 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M4 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.