CPU Comparison
Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i9-13980HX
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Apple M2 Max is a high-end ARM-based system-on-chip (SoC) with a 12-core CPU, up to a 38-core integrated GPU, up to 96 GB of unified LPDDR5-6400 memory, and 400 GB/s of memory bandwidth, designed for professional workflows in MacBook Pro and Mac Studio systems.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16-core Neural Engine with up to 15.8 TOPS accelerates Core ML inference tasks.
- GPU with up to 38 cores and Metal Performance Shaders/MPSGraph supports ML training and inference.
- Unified memory and high bandwidth help large models, but x86 ML stacks still have broader ecosystem support.
- CPU‑side AI workloads benefit from high core count and AVX2, but there is no dedicated NPU or deep‑learning accelerator.
- Suitable for small‑scale local inference and development; not comparable to specialized AI accelerators or newer NPUs.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Native Metal games can run very well (e.g., Resident Evil Village ~RTX 3060 Mobile levels).
- Windows games via Rosetta 2 or translation layers often work but may require tweaking or have compatibility issues.
- Game library is much smaller than on Windows, and some titles lack native Apple Silicon ports.
- Very high single‑threaded performance thanks to 5.6 GHz P‑cores.
- Capable of driving high‑refresh‑rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p with modern GPUs.
- Performance uplift over i9‑13900HX is small in many titles; main gains are in peak clocks and lightly‑threaded scenarios.
- Actual FPS heavily dependent on laptop power limits and cooling; some designs throttle under sustained load.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very high CPU and GPU performance for a laptop‑class SoC.
- Up to 96 GB unified memory with 400 GB/s bandwidth.
- Excellent energy efficiency and battery life in MacBook Pro designs.
- Dual media engines with hardware ProRes acceleration.
- Strong performance in native video editing and creator applications.
Cons
- Very high system cost; M2 Max configurations are expensive.
- No official TDP or detailed clock specs from Apple; some behavior inferred.
- Limited upgradeability (RAM and SSD are soldered on most Macs).
- Gaming ecosystem is smaller than on Windows; many titles require translation layers.
- Thermal throttling can occur under combined CPU+GPU stress in compact enclosures.
Pros
- 24 cores and 32 threads provide class‑leading multi‑threaded performance for a mobile CPU.
- 5.6 GHz max turbo enables very strong single‑threaded and gaming performance.
- Desktop‑derived silicon with unlocked multiplier appeals to enthusiasts and OEMs.
- Full DDR5‑5600 and PCIe 5.0 support keeps the platform competitive with contemporary high‑end laptops.
- Excellent for heavy multitasking, streaming, and workstation‑class workloads.
Cons
- High power draw (up to 157W turbo) requires robust cooling and limits battery life.
- Runs hot under sustained load; some laptops throttle or become loud.
- Efficiency lags AMD’s Ryzen 7045HX Dragon Range and Apple’s M‑series in performance‑per‑watt.
- Modest performance gains over the cheaper Core i9‑13900HX in many real‑world scenarios.
- Integrated UHD graphics are basic; you still need a discrete GPU for serious gaming or compute.
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M2 Max
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-13980HXRival
High-End Laptop / Workstation
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HXRival
High-End Laptop / Workstation
- Intel Core i9-12900HRival
High-End Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSRival
Thin-and-Light Workstation
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
High-End Windows on ARM
- Alt
Similar CPU performance with fewer GPU cores and lower cost; sufficient if you don’t need 96 GB RAM or the maximum GPU throughput.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
Newer architecture with higher per‑core performance and better GPU efficiency; consider if you want a longer useful life and can afford the upgrade.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i9-13980HX + RTX 4070/4080 LaptopAlt
Better for Windows‑only workflows and gaming, with more GPU headroom and broader x86 software compatibility.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + RTX 4070/4080 LaptopAlt
Strong multi‑core CPU and high‑end GPU with better gaming support, though typically higher power draw.
- Apple M1 Max (Used/Refurbished)Alt
Lower cost than M2 Max with similar memory bandwidth and still very capable for many pro workloads.
Intel Core i9-13980HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HXRival
High-End Mobile (Dragon Range)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-13950HXRival
High-End Mobile (Raptor Lake-HX, vPro)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-13900HXRival
High-End Mobile (Raptor Lake-HX)
- AMD Ryzen 9 7845HXRival
High-End Mobile (Dragon Range)
- Intel Core i9-12900HXRival
High-End Mobile (Alder Lake-HX, previous gen)
Direct successor with slightly higher clocks and refined behavior; choose this if you’re buying a new 14th‑gen laptop and want a more recent platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HXAlt
Slightly cut‑down Dragon Range with 16 cores and lower power; a good compromise between performance and thermals in some designs.
- Intel Core i7-13700HXAlt
Fewer cores but still strong gaming and creator performance; often better value and easier to cool in mid‑range laptops.
Our Verdict on Each
An exceptionally powerful and efficient SoC for creative and technical workloads, offering huge unified memory and strong GPU performance, but at a premium price and limited to macOS software ecosystem.
Best for: You regularly work with large 4K/8K video projects, complex 3D scenes, or multi‑app creative workflows and need a quiet, power‑efficient Mac with high memory bandwidth and up to 96 GB unified RAM.
Read the full reviewA flagship 13th‑gen mobile HX CPU that delivers outright performance leadership at the cost of high power draw and heat, making it ideal only for well‑cooled, desktop‑replacement laptops.
Best for: You’re buying a high‑end gaming or workstation laptop with strong cooling and plan to keep it plugged in most of the time, and you want the absolute best CPU performance available in the 13th‑gen lineup.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i9-13980HX?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M2 Max comes out ahead with a score of 9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i9-13980HX?
For gaming, the Intel Core i9-13980HX leads with a gaming performance score of 91/100 among Apple M2 Max and Intel Core i9-13980HX.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i9-13980HX has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i9-13980HX (55 W).
Do Apple M2 Max and Intel Core i9-13980HX use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M2 Max: On-package (BGA), Intel Core i9-13980HX: FCBGA1964), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i9-13980HX has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M2 Max (12 cores), Intel Core i9-13980HX (24 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M2 Max posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M2 Max (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.