CPU Comparison
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i9-11900KB
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M1 is an 8-core ARM-based system-on-a-chip (SoC) that marked Apple’s transition from Intel to its own Apple Silicon for the Mac, combining four high‑performance and four efficiency cores, an 8‑core integrated GPU, and a 16‑core Neural Engine on a 5 nm process.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine accelerates Core ML models
- CPU and GPU also provide ML accelerators for framework‑level ops
- Not designed for large‑scale training or server‑side inference
- No dedicated NPU or AI accelerator hardware.
- DL Boost and AVX‑512 (if enabled by firmware) can accelerate some CPU‑based inference workloads.
- Not competitive with modern CPUs with built‑in NPUs for heavy AI tasks.
Content Creation
Gaming
- 8‑core GPU comparable to low‑end discrete GPUs of its era in some Metal titles
- Rosetta 2 adds overhead for x86 games; some titles have compatibility or performance quirks
- 16 GB memory limit and 8 GPU cores cap texture resolutions and frame rates in modern AAA games
- Strong single‑threaded performance thanks to high boost clocks.
- Capable of high‑refresh‑rate 1080p gaming with a suitable GPU.
- Performance is close to the desktop i9‑11900K in many CPU‑bound games.
- Newer gaming CPUs with hybrid architectures may offer higher FPS in some titles.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent single‑thread performance and responsiveness
- Outstanding performance per watt and battery life
- Integrated GPU much faster than old Intel UHD/Iris in Macs
- Unified memory simplifies development and improves efficiency
- Silent, fanless operation in MacBook Air and Mac mini under light loads
- Strong on‑device ML inference via Neural Engine
Cons
- Only 8 CPU threads; heavy multi‑thread workloads can hit a ceiling
- Max 16 GB unified memory; not user‑upgradeable
- No eGPU support and limited PCIe expansion
- Rosetta 2 translation layer for some x86 apps; not all software is native
- Newer M2/M3 chips and modern x86 CPUs offer more cores, higher clocks, and better GPU performance
Pros
- 8 high‑performance Willow Cove cores with 16 threads
- High single‑core boost up to 5.3 GHz with Thermal Velocity Boost
- 65 W configurable TDP (55–65 W) enables compact cooling
- 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes from CPU for modern GPU and NVMe
- Integrated UHD Graphics 750 with Quick Sync Video
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking on supported platforms
Cons
- BGA 1787 package: CPU is soldered and not replaceable
- Platform is discontinued; limited long‑term upgrade path
- No DDR5 or PCIe 5.0 support
- Newer Intel and AMD CPUs offer better efficiency and performance per watt
- Larger L2 cache (10 MB total) benefits some workloads but increases die cost
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M1
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Rival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- Intel Core i5-1135G7Rival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 5 4600HRival
Performance Laptop
- Intel Core i7-11800HRival
High‑Performance Laptop
- Alt
Same platform with ~18% faster CPU, 35% faster GPU, and support for up to 24 GB unified memory.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
More CPU/GPU cores and higher memory bandwidth for heavier creative workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 6800UAlt
Modern x86 laptop CPU with higher multi‑thread performance and DDR5 memory.
- Intel Core i7-1360PAlt
Higher core count and better sustained multi‑thread performance in thin laptops.
- Alt
Newer architecture with better GPU and CPU performance per watt and improved media engines.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i9-11900KB
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11900KRival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
Mobile / SFF Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11900HRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HRival
Mobile / SFF Desktop
- Intel Core i7-11700BRival
SFF Desktop / BGA
- Intel Core i9-12900HAlt
Newer 12th‑gen hybrid architecture with significantly higher multi‑threaded performance and better efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HXAlt
Zen 3+ with stronger multi‑core performance and modern features, often in similar SFF laptops.
- Intel Core i5-13600KAlt
Better value and gaming performance on a socketed DDR4/DDR5 platform with more upgrade flexibility.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700Alt
AM5 platform with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, offering a more modern upgrade path and strong single‑thread speed.
Our Verdict on Each
A landmark chip that delivered class‑leading efficiency and single‑thread speed for thin laptops, still very capable for most users but increasingly outdated compared to M2/M3 and modern x86 rivals in multi‑thread and GPU workloads.
Best for: Used or refurbished M1 MacBook Air / Mac mini for general use, study, or light creative work at a low price
Read the full reviewA potent 8‑core Tiger Lake chip with excellent single‑threaded performance and modern features, but locked to BGA and now discontinued, making it mainly interesting for existing NUC 11 Extreme owners or very specific embedded use cases.
Best for: Upgrading or repairing an Intel NUC 11 Extreme ‘Beast Canyon’ or similar BGA‑based SFF system where you can reuse the existing compute element and cooling.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M1 or Intel Core i9-11900KB?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M1 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M1 or Intel Core i9-11900KB?
For gaming, the Intel Core i9-11900KB leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among Apple M1 and Intel Core i9-11900KB.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i9-11900KB has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i9-11900KB (65 W).
Do Apple M1 and Intel Core i9-11900KB use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M1: On-package (BGA-style, not user-replaceable), Intel Core i9-11900KB: Intel BGA 1787), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i9-11900KB posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M1 (7,404), Intel Core i9-11900KB (22,748). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.