CPU Comparison
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i9-11900H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M1 is an 8-core ARM-based system-on-a-chip (SoC) that marked Apple’s transition from Intel to its own Apple Silicon for the Mac, combining four high‑performance and four efficiency cores, an 8‑core integrated GPU, and a 16‑core Neural Engine on a 5 nm process.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine accelerates Core ML models
- CPU and GPU also provide ML accelerators for framework‑level ops
- Not designed for large‑scale training or server‑side inference
- No dedicated NPU; relies on CPU AVX-512 and GNA 2.0 for AI workloads
- Suitable for light local inference and on-device ML, not serious training or large models
- Intel Deep Learning Boost (AVX-512 VNNI) helps some quantized inference tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- 8‑core GPU comparable to low‑end discrete GPUs of its era in some Metal titles
- Rosetta 2 adds overhead for x86 games; some titles have compatibility or performance quirks
- 16 GB memory limit and 8 GPU cores cap texture resolutions and frame rates in modern AAA games
- High single-core turbo (up to 4.9 GHz) benefits CPU-bound games
- Performance highly dependent on laptop cooling and power limits
- Competitive with Ryzen 7 5800H in many games at similar power
- Newer Intel/AMD mobile CPUs often deliver higher FPS at lower power
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent single‑thread performance and responsiveness
- Outstanding performance per watt and battery life
- Integrated GPU much faster than old Intel UHD/Iris in Macs
- Unified memory simplifies development and improves efficiency
- Silent, fanless operation in MacBook Air and Mac mini under light loads
- Strong on‑device ML inference via Neural Engine
Cons
- Only 8 CPU threads; heavy multi‑thread workloads can hit a ceiling
- Max 16 GB unified memory; not user‑upgradeable
- No eGPU support and limited PCIe expansion
- Rosetta 2 translation layer for some x86 apps; not all software is native
- Newer M2/M3 chips and modern x86 CPUs offer more cores, higher clocks, and better GPU performance
Pros
- 8 high-performance Willow Cove cores with strong single-thread speed
- 20 PCIe 4.0 CPU lanes for GPU and NVMe
- DDR4-3200 dual-channel with good bandwidth
- Configurable 35–45 W TDP fits both thin and thick designs
- Integrated UHD Graphics with Quick Sync for video encode/decode
- AVX-512 and DL Boost for specialized workloads
Cons
- Older 10 nm SuperFin process is less efficient than Intel 7 and TSMC 7 nm/6 nm
- No DDR5 or PCIe 5.0 support; platform feels dated in 2026
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- Power-hungry under sustained multi-thread vs modern competitors
- Now discontinued; no long-term platform upgrade path
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M1
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Rival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- Intel Core i5-1135G7Rival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 5 4600HRival
Performance Laptop
- Intel Core i7-11800HRival
High‑Performance Laptop
- Alt
Same platform with ~18% faster CPU, 35% faster GPU, and support for up to 24 GB unified memory.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
More CPU/GPU cores and higher memory bandwidth for heavier creative workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 6800UAlt
Modern x86 laptop CPU with higher multi‑thread performance and DDR5 memory.
- Intel Core i7-1360PAlt
Higher core count and better sustained multi‑thread performance in thin laptops.
- Alt
Newer architecture with better GPU and CPU performance per watt and improved media engines.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i9-11900H
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HRival
High-End Mobile
- Intel Core i7-11800HRival
High-End Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
Enthusiast Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-10885HRival
High-End Mobile (Previous Gen)
- Intel Core i7-12700HRival
High-End Mobile (Next Gen)
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HSAlt
More efficient Zen 3+ with RDNA 2 iGPU and better battery life in many designs.
- Intel Core i9-12900HAlt
14-core Alder Lake-H with higher single- and multi-thread performance and DDR5 support on newer platforms.
- Intel Core i5-12450HAlt
If you don’t need 8 cores, a newer 12th-gen i5 can be faster and more efficient while costing less.
Our Verdict on Each
A landmark chip that delivered class‑leading efficiency and single‑thread speed for thin laptops, still very capable for most users but increasingly outdated compared to M2/M3 and modern x86 rivals in multi‑thread and GPU workloads.
Best for: Used or refurbished M1 MacBook Air / Mac mini for general use, study, or light creative work at a low price
Read the full reviewA fast 8-core mobile CPU in its day, with strong single-thread performance and PCIe 4.0, but now outclassed by 12th/13th-gen Intel and Ryzen 6000/7000 in efficiency and multi-core performance.
Best for: Buying a discounted 2021-era gaming or workstation laptop where the i9-11900H is already installed, and you prioritize GPU and thermals over CPU generation.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M1 or Intel Core i9-11900H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M1 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M1 or Intel Core i9-11900H?
For gaming, the Intel Core i9-11900H leads with a gaming performance score of 82/100 among Apple M1 and Intel Core i9-11900H.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i9-11900H has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i9-11900H (45 W).
Do Apple M1 and Intel Core i9-11900H use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M1: On-package (BGA-style, not user-replaceable), Intel Core i9-11900H: FCBGA1787), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i9-11900H posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M1 (7,404), Intel Core i9-11900H (12,345). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.