CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6780E vs Intel Xeon 6787P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6780E is a 144-core E-core server processor in the Xeon 6 family designed for high-density scale-out cloud and data center workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Supports Intel DL Boost (AVX2 VNNI) for CPU inference, but lacks specialized matrix engines.
- Typically paired with discrete accelerators (GPUs/DPUs) for heavier AI workloads.
- E-core architecture is best for inference latency across many small models, not training.
- AMX and DL Boost accelerate CPU‑side inference and low‑precision math
- Best used as a complement to dedicated AI accelerators rather than a replacement
Content Creation
Gaming
- Not designed or marketed for gaming workloads.
- Single-core frequency is modest compared to client CPUs.
- Lacks integrated graphics; discrete GPU required.
- Server-focused SKU with no integrated graphics
- Can be paired with GPUs for GPU‑limited workloads, but client CPUs or specialized GPUs are better for pure gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 144 E-cores for high parallelism
- Eight-channel DDR5-6400 memory
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for extensive I/O
- Built-in accelerators (QAT, DSA, DLB, IAA)
- Intel 3 process for better efficiency
- Supports up to 4 TB of memory
Cons
- No AVX-512 support limits some HPC workloads
- Modest boost clocks for latency-sensitive tasks
- 330 W TDP demands robust cooling
- No integrated graphics
- Multiplier locked; not for overclocking
Pros
- 86 cores and 172 threads for massive parallelism
- 8‑channel DDR5/MRDIMM with high bandwidth and capacity
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes and CXL 2.0 for I/O‑heavy servers
- Integrated QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA, AMX accelerators
- Intel 3 process and Redwood Cove IPC gains vs prior Xeons
Cons
- 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and power
- High platform cost (CPU + DDR5/MRDIMM + platform)
- Overkill for small business or light workloads
- No integrated graphics and limited client‑use ecosystem
- New platform; early BIOS/firmware maturity considerations
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6780E
- AMD EPYC 9754 (Bergamo)Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9684X (Genoa-X)Rival
Server
Similar core count with lower TDP and different frequency profile.
Compare head-to-head- 5th Gen Intel Xeon ScalableAlt
P-core-based choice for higher per-core performance needs.
- AMD EPYC 9754Alt
Zen 4c-based high-core-count competitor optimized for cloud.
Intel Xeon 6787P
- AMD EPYC 9754 (Bergamo, 128 cores, 256 threads)Rival
Cloud‑optimized / High‑density server
- AMD EPYC 9005 series (Turin, up to 192 Zen 5 cores)Rival
High‑end server / AI / HPC
- Intel Xeon 6980P (128 cores, Granite Rapids‑AP)Rival
High‑core‑count server / HPC
- Intel Xeon 6780E (144 E‑cores, Sierra Forest)Rival
Scale‑out / Cloud‑native
- Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ (5th Gen, 64 cores)Rival
Previous‑gen enterprise server
Fewer cores (64) but similar platform and lower price if 86 cores are not required.
Compare head-to-headHigher core count (128) for workloads that can leverage more threads in a single socket.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9754Alt
Higher core density (128 Zen 4c cores) for cloud‑native workloads where TCO matters more than per‑core performance.
- AMD EPYC 9005 seriesAlt
Latest Zen 5/5c cores with higher IPC and core counts, strong alternative for new server deployments.
- Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+Alt
Lower‑cost 5th‑gen option with good performance if Granite Rapids features are not required.
Our Verdict on Each
The Xeon 6780E delivers exceptional core density and throughput for scale-out cloud and containerized workloads, but the lack of AVX-512 and modest clock speeds mean it is not optimized for compute-bound HPC or single-threaded tasks.
Best for: High-density cloud deployments and large-scale virtualization.
Read the full reviewAn extremely powerful dual-socket server CPU with huge core counts, strong per-thread performance, and rich integrated acceleration, best suited for new data center builds where its platform cost and power can be justified.
Best for: New dual‑socket server builds for VM‑heavy, database, HPC, or AI inference where 86 cores and 8‑channel memory can be fully utilized.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6780E or Intel Xeon 6787P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6787P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6780E or Intel Xeon 6787P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6787P leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Xeon 6780E and Intel Xeon 6787P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6780E has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6780E (330 W), Intel Xeon 6787P (350 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6780E and Intel Xeon 6787P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6780E has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6780E (144 cores), Intel Xeon 6787P (86 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6787P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6787P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.