CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6761P vs Intel Xeon 6776P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6761P is a 64-core, 128-thread server and workstation processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, built on Intel’s 3 process node. It targets single-socket platforms requiring high core counts, large memory capacity, and strong AI acceleration, with a 350W TDP and support for DDR5 and MRDIMM memory up to 8000 MT/s.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel AMX accelerates matrix operations for inference and low‑precision training
- DL Boost (AVX‑512 VNNI) improves INT8 inference throughput
- Best suited for CPU‑based AI or as a host for discrete accelerators, not as a replacement for GPUs in large‑scale training
- Optimized as a host CPU for GPU‑accelerated AI systems (e.g., NVIDIA DGX B300).
- Supports Intel AMX, DL Boost, and AVX‑512 for CPU‑side AI inference.
- Best leveraged orchestrating GPUs rather than as a standalone AI accelerator.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Not designed or marketed for gaming
- Few games scale beyond 16–24 threads
- Platform cost and power are disproportionate for gaming
- Server‑focused processor with no gaming‑oriented benchmarks.
- Single‑thread boost up to 3.9 GHz is decent, but gaming is not a target use case.
- Use desktop or workstation CPUs for gaming‑centric builds.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 64 cores / 128 threads for highly parallel workloads
- 8‑channel DDR5 / MRDIMM up to 8000 MT/s, up to 4 TB capacity
- 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes for dense I/O configurations
- Intel AMX and DL Boost for AI acceleration
- Mature server RAS and virtualization feature set
- Speed Select Technology for fine‑grained per‑core tuning
Cons
- High 350W TDP and associated cooling and power requirements
- Single‑socket only; no 2P scalability
- Premium pricing typical of high‑core‑count Xeon SKUs
- No integrated graphics (not expected in this segment)
- Locked multiplier; tuning is enterprise‑oriented, not enthusiast‑oriented
Pros
- 64 cores and 128 threads for highly parallel workloads
- 336 MB L3 cache reduces memory bottlenecks
- 8‑channel DDR5/MRDIMM with up to 4 TB memory capacity
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for GPUs, NICs, and NVMe
- Built‑in accelerators (QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA, AMX) for AI, networking, and analytics
- Priority Core Turbo to boost critical threads
Cons
- High 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- Premium pricing typical of high‑core‑count Xeon SKUs
- Locked multiplier; no overclocking headroom
- Overkill for lightly‑threaded or small‑scale workloads
- No integrated graphics; relies on discrete or BMC graphics
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6761P
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
32‑core Server
- AMD EPYC 9684XRival
96‑core Server (Genoa‑X)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6767PRival
64‑core Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6768PRival
64‑core Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6760PRival
64‑core Server
- Previous‑Gen Xeon Platinum 8470Alt
Dual‑socket Sapphire Rapids platform; attractive if 2P scalability is required and newer Xeon 6 features are not critical.
Intel Xeon 6776P
- AMD EPYC 9534 (64‑core, 280 W)Rival
Server / General Purpose
- AMD EPYC 9575F (64‑core, 400 W, Zen 5)Rival
Server / AI‑Optimized
- Intel Xeon 6774P (64‑core, 350 W, higher base clock)Rival
Server / AI
- Intel Xeon 6781P (80‑core, 350 W)Rival
Server / AI+HPC
- AMD EPYC 9654 (96‑core, 360 W, Genoa)Rival
Server / High‑Core‑Count
Same core count and cache with higher base clock (2.5 GHz), better if you need slightly higher frequency at similar TDP.
Compare head-to-head36‑core, 205 W alternative with lower cost and power when you don’t need 64 cores.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9534Alt
64‑core, 280 W competitor with 12 memory channels and 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes, offering different memory/I/O trade‑offs.
- AMD EPYC 9575FAlt
Higher‑frequency Zen 5 64‑core CPU at 400 W, aimed at GPU‑heavy AI servers where clock speed matters.
80‑core SKU with more performance headroom for extremely parallel workloads, at similar platform cost.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A very high‑core‑count, single‑socket Granite Rapids CPU with strong memory bandwidth, integrated accelerators, and competitive AI performance, best suited for users who can fully utilize 64 cores and justify the 350W TDP and platform cost.
Best for: Single‑socket servers or workstations that can keep 64 cores busy with parallel, memory‑intensive workloads such as virtualization, databases, analytics, and AI inference, and where high PCIe density and integrated accelerators are valuable.
Read the full reviewA high‑core‑count, cache‑rich server CPU tailored for GPU‑accelerated AI and HPC platforms, offering excellent memory bandwidth and I/O, but with a 350 W TDP and premium pricing that makes sense primarily in dense multi‑GPU servers where its features are fully utilized.
Best for: Dual‑socket AI or HPC servers with multiple high‑end GPUs where you need 64 cores, large cache, and maximum PCIe 5.0 lanes for I/O density.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6761P or Intel Xeon 6776P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6761P leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Xeon 6761P and Intel Xeon 6776P.
Do Intel Xeon 6761P and Intel Xeon 6776P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.