CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 674X vs Intel Xeon 696X
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 674X is a 28-core, 56-thread workstation processor built on Intel’s Granite Rapids-WS architecture, targeting creators, engineers, and data scientists who need high core counts, eight-channel DDR5/MRDIMM memory, and massive PCIe 5.0 expansion in a single-socket platform.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Strong CPU-based inference and data preprocessing for ML pipelines.
- Supports Intel AMX and DL Boost for accelerated AI workloads on CPU.
- Best used with GPU accelerators for training; excels at orchestration and preprocessing.
- Intel AMX and AVX‑512 FP16 provide strong CPU‑side inference for small to medium models.
- Not a replacement for dedicated GPUs or accelerators on large LLMs.
- Well‑suited for edge inference, batch scoring, and pre‑processing stages of AI pipelines.
Content Creation
Gaming
- High boost clocks up to 4.9 GHz help in CPU-heavy games.
- Not designed as a gaming CPU; platform cost and power are hard to justify for pure gaming.
- Best paired with a high-end GPU where CPU bottlenecks are minimal at high resolutions.
- High single‑thread clocks help some titles, but core count is largely wasted for gaming.
- Platform is optimized for professional workloads, not game scheduling.
- Cost and power are hard to justify for a gaming‑only use case.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 28 high-performance P-cores with strong per-core throughput.
- Eight-channel DDR5/MRDIMM with up to 4TB capacity for large models and datasets.
- 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes for multi-GPU, NVMe, and high-speed networking.
- Enterprise RAS features (ECC, vPro, VROC, VMD) for stability and manageability.
- Designed for single-socket workstations with high I/O demands.
Cons
- High power consumption (270W base, up to 324W turbo) requires robust cooling.
- Expensive CPU and platform; total cost of a Xeon 600 workstation is very high.
- No integrated graphics; a discrete GPU is mandatory.
- Not unlocked for enthusiast overclocking.
- Overkill for gaming or light content creation.
Pros
- 64 cores and 128 threads for heavily parallel workloads
- 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes for multi‑GPU and fast storage
- 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 / MRDIMM‑8000 memory with 4 TB support
- Modern Redwood Cove P‑cores with AMX and AVX‑512 AI acceleration
- Single‑socket W890 workstation platform with vPro manageability
Cons
- Very high power draw (350W base, up to 420W turbo)
- Expensive CPU and platform (W890 motherboard, 8‑channel DDR5, robust PSU)
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- Overkill for gaming and light workloads
- Limited real‑world benchmarks and software optimizations so far
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 674X
- Intel Xeon 676XRival
Workstation
- Intel Xeon 698XRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WXRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WXRival
Workstation
- Intel Xeon w9-3495XRival
Workstation
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285KAlt
Better choice for gaming and light productivity with much lower power consumption, though fewer cores and less I/O.
- AMD Ryzen 9 9950XAlt
High-end desktop CPU with excellent gaming and creator performance; more power-efficient but no ECC or eight-channel memory.
- Intel Xeon w7-2495XAlt
Previous-gen Xeon W workstation CPU with 24 cores; may be cheaper on the used market but with slower I/O and memory.
Intel Xeon 696X
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WXRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WXRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WXRival
Workstation
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon w9‑3595XRival
Workstation
- Intel Xeon 698XRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980XAlt
Non‑PRO Threadripper with 64 cores and more OC headroom if you don’t need PRO manageability features.
- Dual‑socket Xeon server platformAlt
If you need >86 cores or dual‑socket RAS features, a 2S Xeon Granite Rapids‑SP server may be more appropriate.
Our Verdict on Each
A potent workstation CPU with best-in-class I/O and memory bandwidth, ideal for users who can leverage its 28 cores and 128 PCIe lanes, though power efficiency and platform cost are high.
Best for: Building a single-socket workstation for 3D rendering, simulation, or AI/ML orchestration where you need many cores, lots of memory, and several GPUs or high-speed NICs.
Read the full reviewA no‑compromise workstation CPU for users who need maximum core count, PCIe lanes, and memory bandwidth in a single socket, provided you can supply sufficient cooling and power.
Best for: Professional workstation for rendering, simulation, or AI where you need maximum cores, PCIe lanes, and memory in a single socket and can justify the high platform cost.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 674X or Intel Xeon 696X?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 674X leads with a gaming performance score of 70/100 among Intel Xeon 674X and Intel Xeon 696X.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 674X has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 674X (270 W), Intel Xeon 696X (350 W).
Do Intel Xeon 674X and Intel Xeon 696X use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 696X has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 674X (28 cores), Intel Xeon 696X (64 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 674X posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 674X (38,400), Intel Xeon 696X (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.