CPU Comparison

Intel Xeon 6716P-B vs Intel Xeon 6724P

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6716P-B is a 40-core, 80-thread server/edge processor based on the Granite Rapids-D (Xeon 6 SoC) platform, designed for single-socket systems with integrated networking and acceleration for vRAN, security, and edge AI workloads.

Intel · Xeon 6700P Series
Intel Xeon 6716P-B
40C / 80T3.5 GHz235 W
8.2
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Xeon 6
Intel Xeon 6724P
16C / 32T4.3 GHz210 W
8.4
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Edge / Telecom / Industrial Server
Server
Segment
Server / Edge / Networking
Server
Generation
6th Gen Xeon (Granite Rapids)
6th Gen Xeon Scalable
Launched
2025
2025
Status
Launched
Launched
Codename
Granite Rapids-D
Granite Rapids
Series
Xeon 6700P Series
Xeon 6
Family
Intel Xeon 6
Xeon Scalable
Predecessor
Intel Xeon D-27xx / D-28xx series
Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ (Emerald Rapids)

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
40
16
Threads
80
32
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
160 MB
72 MB
L2 Cache
80 MB
TDP
235 W
210 W
Architecture
Architecture
Granite Rapids-D (Redwood Cove P-cores)
Granite Rapids (Redwood Cove)
Process Node
Intel 3 (compute) / Intel 4 (I/O)
Intel 3
Memory
Memory Type
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-6400
Memory Channels
Quad (4)
Octa (8)
Max Memory
1130 GB
4096 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
FCBGA4368
FCLGA4710
PCIe Version
PCIe 4.0/5.0
5.0
PCIe Lanes
48
88
Integrated GPU
None
None
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Xeon 6716P-B85
Intel Xeon 6724P

Gaming

Intel Xeon 6716P-B30
Intel Xeon 6724P

Virtualization

Intel Xeon 6716P-B82
Intel Xeon 6724P

Efficiency

Intel Xeon 6716P-B55
Intel Xeon 6724P

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Xeon 6716P-BGood (for edge AI)
  • AMX and AVX-512 provide strong CPU-based AI inference for edge models
  • No dedicated NPU or GPU; for large models, pair with discrete accelerators
  • Well suited for small to medium batch inference at the edge
Intel Xeon 6724PStrong (CPU inference)
  • AMX support improves matrix multiply throughput for AI inference on CPU.
  • QAT and DSA can offload data movement and compression in AI pipelines.
  • For heavy training, GPUs or dedicated accelerators are still preferred.

Content Creation

Intel Xeon 6716P-BGood (for edge-focused workloads)
FFmpeg/x264/x265 video transcoding (edge)Light 3D and media processing at the edgeImage analytics and video analytics pipelines
Intel Xeon 6724PLimited
CPU-based RenderingSoftware CompilationScientific ComputingOffline Transcoding

Gaming

Intel Xeon 6716P-BNot applicable
  • No integrated graphics; not intended for gaming
  • Server-optimized I/O and power management
  • Gamers should choose mainstream desktop or workstation CPUs instead
Intel Xeon 6724PNot Applicable
  • Xeon 6724P is a server processor without integrated graphics and is not intended for gaming.
  • Modern server platforms may lack BIOS features and driver optimizations used in desktop gaming.
  • Performance would be limited by the server environment, cooling, and lack of GPU focus.

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Workstations
Low
Content Creation
Moderate (edge transcoding/analytics)
Virtualization
Moderate (edge NFV)
High

Best CPU by Use Case

5G vRAN / RAN
Excellent
Edge Security & VPN Gateway
Excellent
NFV / Software-Defined Networking
Excellent
Industrial Control & Telecom Servers
Very Good
Edge AI Inference
Good
SQL/OLTP Databases
Excellent
Virtualization
Excellent
AI Inference (AMX)
Very Good
In-Memory Analytics
Excellent
High-Throughput Storage
Excellent

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Xeon 6716P-B

Pros

  • 40 high-performance P-cores with AVX-512 and AMX
  • Integrated vRAN Boost and QAT for 5G and security offload
  • 48 PCIe 5.0/4.0 lanes in a compact SoC
  • Rugged BGA4368 package suited for industrial and telecom environments
  • DDR5-6400 ECC memory support up to 1.13 TB

Cons

  • High 235 W TDP for a 40-core edge SoC
  • BGA soldered package; not upgradeable or easily replaceable
  • Single-socket only, no multi-socket scaling
  • No integrated graphics; not suitable as a standalone desktop/gaming CPU
  • Newer AMD EPYC 8005 SKUs offer more cores at similar or lower TDP
Intel Xeon 6724P

Pros

  • High clock speeds for a 16-core server CPU
  • Eight DDR5-6400 memory channels with up to 4 TB capacity
  • 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for extensive IO and accelerators
  • Intel 3 manufacturing for better efficiency over prior nodes
  • On-die accelerators (QAT, DSA, DLB, IAA) reduce load on CPU cores
  • AMX improves CPU-based AI inference performance
  • Support for up to eight sockets (4S/8S scalability)
  • Comprehensive security and RAS features (TDX, SGX, TME)

Cons

  • No integrated graphics
  • Multiplier locked; no overclocking support
  • 16-core count is lower than many high-end server SKUs
  • 210 W TDP at 16 cores raises power-per-core vs higher-core SKUs
  • Availability may be limited to enterprise channels and OEMs
  • Server platform may be overkill for workstation or consumer use cases

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Xeon 6716P-B

  • AMD EPYC 8635P (84-core, 225 W)

    Edge / Telecom

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 8024P (8-core, low-power edge)

    Edge / IoT

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6706P-B (40-core, 235 W, Granite Rapids-D)

    Edge / Networking

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon Gold 6430 (32-core, 270 W, Sapphire Rapids)

    General Server

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon w5-3435X (16-core, 270 W, Sapphire Rapids)

    Workstation / Server

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 8635P
    Alt

    Much higher core count at similar TDP for edge workloads that can leverage more threads.

  • Very similar Granite Rapids-D SoC if you need a slightly different feature or availability profile.

    Compare head-to-head
  • Intel Xeon Gold 6430
    Alt

    Better for general dual-socket enterprise servers where edge accelerators are not required.

  • AMD EPYC 9455 (48-core, 300 W)
    Alt

    Higher core count and memory bandwidth for more traditional server workloads.

  • Older Xeon D-2789NT
    Alt

    Lower TDP, simpler edge/NFV use cases where 40 P-cores and heavy acceleration are overkill.

Intel Xeon 6724P

  • AMD EPYC 9455

    Server

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 9335

    Server

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 8534P

    Server

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 9354P

    Server

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 9254

    Server

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6720P
    Alt

    Lower-cost 6700P-series option if 16 cores are sufficient and budget is a priority.

  • Intel Xeon 6729P
    Alt

    More cores within the same family for higher throughput in parallel workloads.

  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
    Alt

    For single-socket workstation builds requiring high PCIe and memory bandwidth but using a desktop/workstation platform.

Our Verdict on Each

A very capable edge-optimized Xeon with strong integrated acceleration and I/O for telecom and industrial workloads, but its high TDP and BGA soldering limit flexibility and DIY appeal.

Best for: OEM or integrator building dense, vibration-resistant edge or telecom appliances that can leverage vRAN Boost and QAT in a single-socket BGA platform.

Read the full review
Intel Xeon 6724PRecommended

The Xeon 6724P brings Granite Rapids fundamentals—Intel 3, DDR5-6400, PCIe 5.0, and AMX—into a 16-core package well-suited for per-core licensing, high-frequency workloads, and IO-heavy servers. At 210 W, it’s not the lowest-power option, but accelerators like QAT, DSA, DLB, and IAA broaden its appeal for data processing and AI.

Best for: Enterprise workloads that benefit from high per-core performance, DDR5 bandwidth, and on-die accelerators—especially databases, virtualization, and AI inference.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Xeon 6716P-B or Intel Xeon 6724P?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6724P comes out ahead with a score of 8.4/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6716P-B or Intel Xeon 6724P?

For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6716P-B leads with a gaming performance score of 30/100 among Intel Xeon 6716P-B and Intel Xeon 6724P.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Xeon 6724P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6716P-B (235 W), Intel Xeon 6724P (210 W).

Do Intel Xeon 6716P-B and Intel Xeon 6724P use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6716P-B: FCBGA4368, Intel Xeon 6724P: FCLGA4710), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which has more cores?

The Intel Xeon 6716P-B has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6716P-B (40 cores), Intel Xeon 6724P (16 cores).