CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is a high-performance mobile processor designed for enthusiast gaming laptops and portable workstations. Launched in early 2025, it is based on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, featuring a robust 20-core configuration without Hyper-Threading. This setup includes 8 'Lion Cove' P-Cores and 12 'Skymont' E-Cores, operating across 20 threads. Manufactured on TSMC's 3nm process, the chip boasts a die size of 243 mm² and packs 17.8 billion transistors. It reaches impressive clock speeds, with a base frequency of 2.4 GHz and a maximum turbo of 5.2 GHz. The processor features an unlocked multiplier, a rare feature for mobile chips, allowing OEMs and extreme enthusiasts to push performance boundaries. With a base power of 55W and a maximum turbo power of 160W, it delivers desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor, paired with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU and a 13 TOPS NPU.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Rivals desktop CPUs in multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench and Blender.
Handles heavily threaded tasks with ease, losing only 1-2% to the 285HX.
Gaming
Exceptional gaming performance when paired with a high-end discrete GPU, limited only by power constraints.
Performs identically to the flagship in GPU-bound scenarios.
Virtualization
Excellent for running multiple VMs locally on a workstation laptop.
Strong performance for local VMs, limited slightly by dual-channel memory.
Efficiency
Low efficiency at idle compared to standard H-series, designed for plugged-in performance.
Power-hungry under load, requiring robust laptop cooling.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- NPU 3 provides 13 TOPS
- Total platform AI is 33 TOPS
- Sufficient for basic background AI tasks but not heavy local LLMs
- 13 TOPS NPU included
- Total Int8 TOPS up to 36
- Relies heavily on CPU/dGPU for heavy AI
Content Creation
Gaming
- High single-core boost clocks minimize bottlenecks
- Best paired with RTX 4080/4090 mobile GPUs
- Not intended for thin-and-light gaming
- 5.4 GHz turbo is plenty for high-refresh-rate gaming
- Won't bottleneck high-end mobile GPUs
- Overclockable to match higher-tier SKUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Massive 20-core count
- Unlocked multiplier for mobile overclocking
- 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes
- Excellent 5.2 GHz single-core boost
- Desktop-class performance
Cons
- High power consumption (160W turbo)
- Modest 13 TOPS NPU
- Requires massive cooling solution
- Poor battery life in laptops
Pros
- Excellent value for 24-core performance
- Unlocked multiplier allows matching flagship clocks
- 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for maximum expandability
- 36MB L3 cache keeps cores fed
- ECC memory support
Cons
- High power consumption (160W turbo)
- Requires heavy, thick laptop chassis for cooling
- Poor battery life efficiency
- Weak integrated graphics relative to CPU power
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HXRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HXRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 9 285HXRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-14900HXRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3DRival
Mobile
Slightly higher base and boost clocks for similar price.
Compare head-to-headBetter choice for thin-and-light designs with good battery life.
Compare head-to-headPrevious generation, often available at a discount.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAlt
More efficient alternative for moderate gaming.
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HXRival
Mobile (DTR)
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HXRival
Mobile (DTR)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-14900HXRival
Mobile (DTR)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 9 285HXRival
Mobile (DTR)
- Compare head-to-headApple M3 MaxRival
Mobile Workstation
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900HXAlt
A strong competitor for pure gaming performance.
A more budget-friendly option for mid-range gaming.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAlt
If portability and battery life are higher priorities.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3DAlt
Features 3D V-Cache for superior gaming cache.
Our Verdict on Each
A powerhouse mobile CPU offering unlocked overclocking and massive multi-core throughput for desktop replacements.
Best for: Desktop replacement gaming laptop
Read the full reviewOffers 95% of the flagship's performance for a better value, maintaining the massive 24-core layout and unlocked overclocking.
Best for: The Core Ultra 9 275HX is highly recommended for gamers and creators seeking near-flagship performance without paying the absolute premium for the highest-tier chips. If you are looking at a high-end gaming laptop and the 275HX option is significantly cheaper than the 285HX, it is often the smarter buy, as the 100MHz difference is negligible in real-world scenarios. It retains the unlocked multiplier, 24 cores, and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, making it highly future-proof. However, like all HX chips, it requires a substantial cooling solution to manage its 160W turbo power, so prioritize laptops with robust thermal designs. Avoid this processor if you need a laptop for casual use or long battery life, as it is inefficient for light workloads. Pair it with a high-end GPU to get the most out of your investment.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX or Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads with a gaming performance score of 96/100 among Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX.
Do Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 2114 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (20 cores), Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24 cores).