CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V vs Core Ultra 7 266V
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is a prominent entry in the Lunar Lake lineup, designed to bring exceptional energy efficiency to mobile computing. Released in September 2024, it shares the same foundational architecture as the 236V but aims at users requiring more memory capacity. It integrates 4 performance and 4 efficiency cores, operating at a base clock of 2.1 GHz and boosting up to 4.5 GHz. Manufactured on TSMC’s 3nm process, the chip achieves a remarkable balance between power draw and computational throughput. Unlike its sibling, the 228V comes equipped with 32GB of on-package LPDDR5x memory running at 8533 MT/s, eliminating the need for separate RAM modules on the motherboard. The integrated Arc 130V graphics and a 40 TOPS NPU ensure robust performance for AI-accelerated tasks and moderate gaming. With a 17W base TDP, it is a prime candidate for premium ultraportables targeting professionals who need all-day battery life alongside substantial memory headroom.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
The 32GB of RAM ensures extremely smooth multitasking and productivity application performance.
Snappy performance for everyday office and browsing tasks.
Gaming
Handles casual and older games well at 1080p, but lacks the power for modern AAA titles at high settings.
Capable of playing modern games at low settings and 1080p.
Virtualization
The large memory pool allows for comfortable running of multiple virtual machines or containers.
Limited by 8 threads but can handle light VMs.
Efficiency
Industry-leading power efficiency ensures long battery life even under moderate workloads.
Class-leading power efficiency for exceptional battery life.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 40 TOPS NPU enables efficient local AI processing
- Fully supports Microsoft Copilot+ features
- Handles AI-enhanced creative tools smoothly
- 48 TOPS NPU enables Copilot+ features
- Total 118 TOPS platform performance
- Excellent for local AI model execution
Content Creation
Gaming
- Arc 130V graphics provide smooth 1080p performance in esports titles
- Supports hardware ray tracing
- Not recommended for heavy 3D gaming
- Arc 140V is a massive step up from previous iGPUs
- Best for indie or esports titles
- Can run AAA games at low settings
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Massive 32GB of fast on-package memory
- Exceptional power efficiency
- 40 TOPS NPU for AI workloads
- Strong integrated graphics
- Silent operation capability
Cons
- Memory is non-upgradable
- Lower boost clock than the 236V variant
- No Hyper-Threading limits peak multi-threading
- Limited PCIe lane expansion
Pros
- Incredible power efficiency
- Integrated 16GB memory saves space
- 48 TOPS NPU for Copilot+ AI
- Strong Arc 140V integrated graphics
- Silent operation capabilities
Cons
- Memory is non-upgradeable
- Limited to 8 cores/8 threads
- Not intended for heavy rendering
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M3Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258VRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Mobile
- Core Ultra 5 236VAlt
A cheaper alternative if 16GB of RAM is sufficient and slightly higher clocks are desired.
Offers higher core counts and faster clocks for premium performance.
Compare head-to-head- Apple MacBook Air M3Alt
An alternative for users invested in the macOS ecosystem.
- Snapdragon X PlusAlt
A power-efficient ARM alternative for Windows laptops.
Core Ultra 7 266V
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Rival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M3Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 7 268VAlt
If you need 32GB of integrated RAM instead of 16GB.
For a more budget-friendly Lunar Lake option.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Alt
For an alternative x86 AI PC with upgradeable RAM.
- Apple MacBook Air M3Alt
For a different ecosystem with similar efficiency.
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258VAlt
For slightly different clock speeds and 32GB memory.
Our Verdict on Each
An excellent choice for professionals needing a power-efficient laptop with a large pool of fast integrated memory, though its slightly lower clock speeds compared to the 236V are a fair trade-off.
Best for: Premium ultraportable for professionals needing large memory capacity
Read the full reviewAn incredibly efficient mobile processor that brings massive battery life improvements and integrated AI capabilities to premium ultrabooks.
Best for: You cannot buy the Core Ultra 7 266V as a standalone component; it is only available pre-installed in laptops. When shopping for a laptop, if you prioritize battery life above all else and want a device that handles everyday tasks, moderate creative work, and AI features seamlessly, a 266V-equipped laptop is an excellent choice. However, be aware that the 16 GB of RAM is integrated and cannot be upgraded. If you anticipate needing more memory for heavy workloads in the future, you should look for laptops featuring the 268V variant or consider traditional laptop architectures with upgradeable memory. For general users, 16 GB is sufficient.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 5 228V or Core Ultra 7 266V?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core Ultra 7 266V comes out ahead with a score of 9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 5 228V or Core Ultra 7 266V?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V leads with a gaming performance score of 73/100 among Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and Core Ultra 7 266V.
Do Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and Core Ultra 7 266V use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 2833 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.