CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is the most affordable entry point into the Arrow Lake-S desktop platform, launched at $231 on January 7, 2025. It features a reduced core configuration of 6 Lion Cove P-cores and 4 Skymont E-cores for a total of 10 cores and 10 threads, along with a smaller 20 MB L3 cache compared to the 24 MB found on higher-tier Ultra 5 models. As an F-series processor, the integrated graphics are completely disabled, making a discrete GPU mandatory for any display output. This cost reduction allows Intel to position the 225F as a budget-friendly option for gamers and productivity users who already own or plan to purchase a dedicated graphics card. Despite the reductions, the 225F retains the NPU 3 with 13 TOPS for AI workloads, PCIe 5.0 support, and DDR5-6400 native memory speeds. With a standard 65W TDP and PL1, and a 121W PL2 for boost, it delivers straightforward power characteristics that are easy to pair with mainstream cooling solutions. The processor is available in two part numbers corresponding to A0 and B0 steppings.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
10 cores handle light to moderate productivity well, but the reduced E-core count and smaller L3 cache limit performance in heavily multi-threaded applications.
Good productivity performance with 14 cores, though the 35W PL1 limits sustained multi-threaded throughput compared to non-T models.
Gaming
With a capable discrete GPU, the 6 P-cores provide sufficient performance for most gaming scenarios. The 4.9 GHz boost keeps frame rates competitive, though fewer E-cores slightly impact heavily threaded titles.
The 5.1 GHz boost and 14 cores provide strong gaming performance when paired with a discrete GPU. The 64EU iGPU can handle light gaming at 720p/1080p low, a significant step up from the 235T's 24EU.
Virtualization
Limited by 10 cores and 20 MB cache, making it adequate for 2-3 VMs but not ideal for heavy virtualization workloads.
Adequate for several VMs, with ECC memory adding reliability for data-sensitive virtualization workloads.
Efficiency
The 3 nm process and 65W TDP deliver strong efficiency, comparable to other Arrow Lake-S models with similar power profiles.
Excellent efficiency during sustained operation at 35W PL1, with the 3 nm process ensuring strong performance per watt.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- NPU 3 provides 13 TOPS, same as higher-tier Ultra 5 models
- Total AI performance reduced to 19 TOPS due to lack of iGPU contribution
- Still useful for background AI tasks like noise cancellation and blur
- CPU-based AI inference benefits from Lion Cove P-core architecture
- 29 TOPS total AI performance, second only to the 245K in Ultra 5
- 64EU iGPU contributes 8 TOPS, double the 235T's 4 TOPS GPU contribution
- NPU 3 provides 13 TOPS for sustained AI tasks
- ECC memory adds reliability for AI workloads processing sensitive data
Content Creation
Gaming
- 6 P-cores with 4.9 GHz boost handle most games well when paired with a mid-range GPU
- No iGPU means a discrete GPU is absolutely required
- Performance is largely GPU-bound at 1440p and above
- Fewer E-cores may reduce 1% low frame rates in CPU-heavy titles
- 5.1 GHz boost provides strong performance with a discrete GPU
- 64EU iGPU can handle eSports titles and older games at low settings
- E-cores boost to 4.5 GHz, the highest in the Ultra 5 family
- 35W PL1 may reduce performance in very long CPU-bound gaming sessions
- Ideal for SFF gaming builds with compact GPUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Lowest price for Arrow Lake-S at $231
- Same Lion Cove P-cores as more expensive Ultra 5 models
- NPU 3 included despite budget positioning
- Disabled iGPU frees all PCIe resources for discrete devices
- Standard 65W power profile is easy to cool
- Modern platform with DDR5-6400 and PCIe 5.0
Cons
- No integrated graphics at all, discrete GPU required
- Only 4 E-cores reduce multi-threaded performance significantly
- 20 MB L3 cache is smaller than 24 MB on 14-core models
- Lower 4.9 GHz boost than other Ultra 5 processors
- Locked multiplier prevents overclocking
- Total AI TOPS reduced to 19 without iGPU contribution
Pros
- Only T-series processor with 64EU iGPU
- ECC memory support in a low-power package
- 35W PL1 enables genuine compact builds
- 5.1 GHz boost with 4.5 GHz E-core boost
- 29 TOPS total AI performance
- vPro support for enterprise management
- 114W PL2 provides strong burst capability
Cons
- Low 2.2 GHz base clock limits sustained performance
- Locked multiplier with no overclocking headroom
- A0 stepping may have early-silicon characteristics
- 35W PL1 significantly limits sustained multi-threaded workloads
- At $270, only $49 less than the fully unlocked 245K
- Power limit adjustments may be restricted by some motherboard BIOS implementations
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600XRival
Mainstream Gaming
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600Rival
Budget Gaming
- AMD Ryzen 5 7600Rival
Value AM5
- AMD Ryzen 5 7500FRival
Budget AM5
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-14400FRival
Previous Generation
For $16 more, get 4 additional E-cores, 4 MB more L3 cache, and integrated graphics.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core Ultra 5 245T
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600XRival
Mainstream Gaming
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700GERival
Low-Power APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 245KRival
Enthusiast Alternative
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600GRival
Desktop APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 235ARival
Mainstream Alternative
Save $23 if you can accept the smaller 24EU iGPU and don't need ECC memory.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A sensible budget entry into the Arrow Lake platform for users with a discrete GPU, offering modern architecture and AI features at the lowest price point in the Ultra 5 lineup.
Best for: Budget gaming builds where you already have or are buying a discrete GPU, and want the newest Arrow Lake platform at the lowest entry price.
Read the full reviewA uniquely positioned processor that combines premium features (64EU iGPU, ECC support) with T-series power efficiency, ideal for SFF builds that need strong integrated graphics and data integrity.
Best for: Small form factor or power-constrained builds that need the 64EU iGPU for light graphics work, multi-display support, or ECC memory for data integrity, but cannot accommodate K-series power levels.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 5 225F or Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 5 225F or Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among Intel Core Ultra 5 225F and Intel Core Ultra 5 245T.
Do Intel Core Ultra 5 225F and Intel Core Ultra 5 245T use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel Socket 1851 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core Ultra 5 225F (10 cores), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (14 cores).