CPU Comparison

Intel Core i9-14900 vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 65W desktop processor with 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores, boosting up to 5.8 GHz. It ships with Intel UHD 770 graphics, supports dual-channel DDR4-3200 or DDR5-5600, and fits LGA1700 motherboards. Designed for high-thread productivity and everyday gaming, it targets OEMs and system builders more than enthusiast overclockers.

Top pick
Intel · Core i9
Intel Core i9-14900
24C / 32T5.8 GHz65 W
8.2
Full review
Intel · Core i9
Intel Core i9-14900KS
24C / 32T6.2 GHz150 W
8
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
High-End Desktop
High-End Desktop / Enthusiast
Generation
14th Generation Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh)
14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Launched
2024
2024
Status
Launched
Active
Codename
Raptor Lake Refresh
Raptor Lake-R
Series
Core i9
Core i9
Family
14th Generation Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Core i9 14th Gen (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Predecessor
Intel Core i9-13900 (non-K)
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Successor
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Arrow Lake-S)

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
24
24
Threads
32
32
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost Clock
5.8 GHz
6.2 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
36 MB
36 MB
TDP
65 W
150 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
Raptor Lake (Raptor Cove P-cores, Gracemont E-cores) – Raptor Lake Refresh
Process Node
Intel 7 (10 nm-class)
Intel 7 (10 nm-class Enhanced SuperFin)
Memory
Memory Type
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5600
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Speed
Up to DDR5-5600 MT/s; up to DDR4-3200 MT/s
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5600
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
192 GB
192 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA1700 (FCLGA1700)
FCLGA1700 (Socket 1700)
PCIe Version
PCIe 5.0 and 4.0
PCIe 5.0 (CPU) + PCIe 4.0 (DMI/chipset)
PCIe Lanes
20
20
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
Yes

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i9-14900
Intel Core i9-14900KS94

Gaming

Intel Core i9-14900
Intel Core i9-14900KS93

Virtualization

Intel Core i9-14900
Intel Core i9-14900KS90

Efficiency

Intel Core i9-14900
Intel Core i9-14900KS55

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i9-14900Limited
  • No dedicated NPU; AI workloads rely on CPU or GPU
  • AVX2 and DL Boost instructions support CPU-based inference
  • For best AI performance, a capable GPU is recommended
Intel Core i9-14900KSModerate
  • Intel Deep Learning Boost (AVX2 VNNI) accelerates some CPU-based inference workloads.
  • No dedicated NPU; for serious local AI, modern NPUs or discrete GPUs are faster and more efficient.

Content Creation

Intel Core i9-14900Very Good
Adobe PhotoshopAdobe Premiere ProDaVinci ResolveBlender7-ZipCompiling large codebases
Intel Core i9-14900KSVery Good
Adobe Premiere ProDaVinci ResolveBlenderCinema 4DAfter EffectsV-Ray / Corona Renderer

Gaming

Intel Core i9-14900Very Good
  • Strong single-thread performance with high turbo clocks
  • Benefits from fast DDR5 memory for certain titles
  • Modern X3D CPUs can lead in high-refresh FPS
Intel Core i9-14900KSExcellent
  • 6.2 GHz P-core turbo and strong IPC deliver very high FPS at 1080p and 1440p.
  • Only ~1.7% faster than i9-14900K at 1080p and ~2.5% at 1440p in some reviews.
  • AMD Ryzen 7000X3D models still often lead in CPU-limited gaming scenarios.

Industry Impact

Gaming
Moderate
High
Workstations
High
Moderate
Content Creation
High
High
Virtualization
High
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Multitasking with many browser tabs and apps
Excellent
Photo editing and light video editing
Very Good
Code compilation and IDE work
Very Good
1080p and 1440p gaming
Very Good
Virtual machines and containers
Good
High-Refresh-Rate Gaming
Excellent
4K Video Editing and Streaming
Excellent
3D Rendering and Multi-Threaded Productivity
Very Good
Extreme Overclocking
Excellent
General Office Work
Overkill

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Targeted
Streamers
Targeted
Targeted
Office / Productivity
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i9-14900

Pros

  • 24 cores with strong multi-threaded performance
  • 65 W base power with balanced thermals
  • Supports both DDR4 and DDR5
  • PCIe 5.0 + 4.0 CPU lanes for GPUs and fast SSDs
  • UHD 770 graphics sufficient for display and light media

Cons

  • Locked multiplier limits overclocking
  • Under sustained all-core loads, K-series can be faster with higher power limits
  • No NPU for AI acceleration
  • LGA1700 platform is at end-of-life
  • Power limits on prebuilts may constrain boost durations
Intel Core i9-14900KS

Pros

  • 6.2 GHz max turbo – highest stock desktop clock speed at launch
  • Strong single-thread and gaming performance
  • 24 cores and 32 threads for heavy multi-tasking and productivity
  • Unlocked multiplier and flexible power limits for overclocking
  • PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support for a modern platform

Cons

  • High power draw: 150 W base, up to 253 W turbo, and often 300–350 W in tuned systems
  • Runs hot under load; can hit 100°C even with high-end AIOs if power limits are left unlimited
  • Small real-world gains over the cheaper i9-14900K in most workloads
  • Premium price with questionable price-performance ratio
  • No significant architectural upgrade vs 13th Gen; still a refreshed Raptor Lake design

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Core i9-14900KS

  • Intel Core i9-14900K

    High-End Desktop

    Rival
    Compare head-to-head
  • Intel Core i9-13900KS

    High-End Desktop

    Rival
    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

    High-End Desktop

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

    High-End Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

    High-End Desktop (Next Gen)

    Rival
  • Intel Core i7-14700K
    Alt

    Better value for gaming and mid-range content creation, with lower power consumption and still strong performance.

  • AMD Ryzen 9 7900
    Alt

    More efficient AM5 alternative with solid gaming and productivity performance and a cooler, quieter system.

Our Verdict on Each

The i9-14900 brings K-series core counts to a locked 65W package, delivering excellent multi-thread performance at lower power draws than the 14900K. It’s well-suited to prebuilts and quiet builds where sustained efficiency matters more than peak overclocking.

Best for: Prebuilt or custom desktop seeking high multi-thread performance without the heat and noise of K-series power levels.

Read the full review

Intel’s fastest-ever LGA 1700 desktop CPU by clock speed, but real-world gains over the cheaper i9-14900K are modest, and power/thermals are punishing. A niche choice for overclockers and enthusiasts who must have the top bin.

Best for: You are an extreme overclocker or enthusiast building a showpiece LGA 1700 system and are willing to pay a significant premium for Intel’s best-binned silicon and guaranteed 6.2 GHz capability.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i9-14900 or Intel Core i9-14900KS?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i9-14900 comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i9-14900 or Intel Core i9-14900KS?

For gaming, the Intel Core i9-14900KS leads with a gaming performance score of 93/100 among Intel Core i9-14900 and Intel Core i9-14900KS.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i9-14900 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i9-14900 (65 W), Intel Core i9-14900KS (150 W).

Do Intel Core i9-14900 and Intel Core i9-14900KS use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i9-14900: LGA1700 (FCLGA1700), Intel Core i9-14900KS: FCLGA1700 (Socket 1700)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i9-14900KS posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i9-14900KS (64,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.