CPU Comparison

Intel Core i7-7820X vs Intel Core i9-9900X

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-7820X is an 8-core, 16-thread high-end desktop processor on the X299 platform, offering quad-channel DDR4-2666, 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes, and AVX-512 support for workstation and creator workloads.

Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-7820X
8C / 16T4.5 GHz140 W
7.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i9
Intel Core i9-9900X
10C / 20T4.4 GHz165 W
8
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
High-End Desktop (HEDT)
High-End Desktop (HEDT)
Generation
7th Gen X-Series (Skylake-X)
9th Gen Core X-Series (Basin Falls Refresh)
Launched
2017
2018
Status
Discontinued
Discontinued
Codename
Skylake-X
Skylake-X
Series
Core i7
Core i9
Family
X-Series 7th Gen (Core i7)
X-Series 9th Gen (Core i9)
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-6900K
Intel Core i9-7900X
Successor
Platform discontinued; refreshed X299 and later Core X-series succeeded this lineup
Intel Core i9-10900X

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
8
10
Threads
16
20
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
11 MB
19.25 MB
TDP
140 W
165 W
Architecture
Architecture
Skylake-X
Skylake-X
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Memory Channels
Quad (4)
Quad (4)
Max Memory
128 GB
128 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA2066
FCLGA2066
PCIe Version
3.0
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
28
44
Integrated GPU
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
Yes

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i7-7820X88

Strong multi-threaded throughput in CINEBENCH, HandBrake, and similar workloads at launch; still competent for many content creation tasks compared to modern mainstream parts.

Intel Core i9-9900X88

Strong multi-threaded performance for rendering, compilation, and content creation, though newer 10–12 core desktop CPUs deliver better efficiency.

Gaming

Intel Core i7-7820X78

Delivers high frame rates in 2017-era titles and remains adequate for modern gaming, but newer gaming-focused CPUs with higher clocks and improved IPC pull ahead.

Intel Core i9-9900X78

Smooth for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, but modern mainstream CPUs often match or beat it in lightly-threaded titles while using far less power.

Virtualization

Intel Core i7-7820X85

PCIe and memory bandwidth are helpful for multiple VMs, but core count is moderate for modern heavy virtualization needs.

Intel Core i9-9900XBest91

Excellent for running multiple VMs thanks to 10 cores, quad-channel memory, and VT-x/VT-d support.

Efficiency

Intel Core i7-7820X60

High 140 W TDP and 14 nm process lead to greater power consumption versus newer 7 nm and smaller nodes.

Intel Core i9-9900X60

High 165 W TDP and 14nm process result in notably higher power draw and heat compared to 7nm and 5nm era desktop and HEDT CPUs.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i7-7820XLimited
  • No dedicated AI acceleration hardware
  • AVX-512 can help certain CPU-bound inference tasks
  • Most modern AI workloads are better served by GPUs
Intel Core i9-9900XLimited
  • No dedicated AI or matrix hardware acceleration.
  • Suitable only for CPU-based inference and light ML workloads.

Content Creation

Intel Core i7-7820XVery Good
Adobe Premiere ProDaVinci ResolveBlenderCinema 4DAfter Effects
Intel Core i9-9900XVery Good
Adobe Premiere ProDaVinci ResolveBlenderCinema 4DAfter Effects

Gaming

Intel Core i7-7820XGood
  • Capable of high-refresh gaming with a strong GPU
  • Single-core boost reaches up to 4.5 GHz on favored cores
  • Modern CPUs offer better gaming efficiency and higher IPC
Intel Core i9-9900XGood
  • Capable of 1080p high-refresh and 1440p gaming with a modern GPU.
  • Single-core performance is competitive but not class-leading versus newer mainstream CPUs.
  • PCIe 3.0 x16 is sufficient for current GPUs, but PCIe 4.0/5.0 offer more headroom on newer platforms.

Industry Impact

Gaming
Moderate
Moderate
Workstations
High
High
Content Creation
High
High
Virtualization
High
High

Best CPU by Use Case

4K Video Editing
Very Good
Very Good
3D Rendering
Very Good
Very Good
Software Compilation
Very Good
Virtualization
Good
Gaming
Good
Virtual Machines
Excellent
Multi-GPU Compute
Excellent
High-Refresh Gaming
Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Targeted
Streamers
Targeted
Targeted
Office / Productivity
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i7-7820X

Pros

  • 8 cores and 16 threads for multi-threaded workloads
  • Quad-channel DDR4 memory increases bandwidth
  • 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes plus chipset lanes for expansion
  • Turbo Boost Max 3.0 for higher single-core boosts
  • AVX-512 support for optimized workloads
  • Unlocked multiplier for overclocking

Cons

  • High 140 W TDP and power consumption
  • No integrated graphics
  • Only 28 CPU PCIe lanes, limiting multi-GPU configurations
  • Discontinued platform with limited future upgrades
  • Older 14 nm process versus modern smaller nodes
Intel Core i9-9900X

Pros

  • 10 cores and 20 threads for multi-threaded workloads.
  • 44 PCIe 3.0 lanes for multi-GPU and fast storage.
  • Quad-channel DDR4-2666 with 128 GB capacity support.
  • Unlocked multiplier for enthusiast overclocking.
  • AVX-512 support for specialized floating-point and vector workloads.

Cons

  • High 165 W TDP and 14nm process make it inefficient versus modern CPUs.
  • No integrated graphics; discrete GPU required.
  • Discontinued platform with limited long-term BIOS and support outlook.
  • LGA2066 ecosystem is more expensive and less mainstream than LGA1700/AM5.
  • Memory speed capped at DDR4-2666 officially.

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i7-7820X

  • AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

    Creator/Gaming

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

    Creator/Gaming

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

    Workstation

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

    Workstation

    Rival
  • Compare head-to-head
  • More cores, higher efficiency, and DDR5 on a modern mainstream platform.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7900
    Alt

    Strong multi-threaded performance with excellent efficiency.

  • AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
    Alt

    12-core AM4 option with strong gaming and creator performance.

  • High-performance mainstream platform with good upgrade path.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (used)
    Alt

    Higher core and lane count for workstation-class workloads.

Intel Core i9-9900X

Our Verdict on Each

A competent eight-core HEDT chip with strong multi-threaded performance and platform expansion, though high power draw and limited PCIe lanes compared to higher-tier X299 CPUs make it a niche choice today.

Best for: Used-market upgrade for an existing X299 build with quad-channel DDR4 and a need for more cores than mainstream.

Read the full review

A still-capable HEDT CPU for used builds needing PCIe lanes and memory channels, but outclassed in efficiency and value by newer mainstream and HEDT platforms.

Best for: Used or clearance LGA2066 workstation build where you explicitly need 44 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory on a tight budget.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i7-7820X or Intel Core i9-9900X?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i9-9900X comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i7-7820X has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-7820X (140 W), Intel Core i9-9900X (165 W).

Do Intel Core i7-7820X and Intel Core i9-9900X use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-7820X: LGA2066, Intel Core i9-9900X: FCLGA2066), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which has more cores?

The Intel Core i9-9900X has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i7-7820X (8 cores), Intel Core i9-9900X (10 cores).