CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-6800K vs Intel Core i9-9820X
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-6800K is a six-core, 12-thread HEDT processor on the X99 platform, offering quad-channel DDR4, 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes, and Turbo Boost Max 3.0 for creators and enthusiasts who need more I/O than mainstream desktops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated NPUs or matrix accelerators
- Suitable for CPU-bound inference workloads only
- AVX2 support helps in some compute-heavy tasks
- No dedicated AI or matrix acceleration hardware.
- Can handle CPU‑based inference and small models, but not competitive with modern NPUs or GPUs for serious AI workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Handles high-refresh gaming with a capable GPU
- Turbo Boost Max 3.0 can aid lightly threaded titles
- Modern CPUs typically deliver higher gaming efficiency
- Solid 60+ FPS experience in most AAA games at 1440p with a modern GPU.
- High single‑core boost helps with CPU‑bound titles and high‑refresh gaming.
- Newer mainstream and HEDT CPUs often deliver better 1% lows and efficiency.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Six cores and 12 threads remain viable for productivity
- Quad-channel DDR4 provides strong memory bandwidth
- 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes enable multi-GPU and NVMe flexibility
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking enthusiasts
- Turbo Boost Max 3.0 improves lightly threaded performance
Cons
- 140 W TDP is high by modern standards
- No integrated graphics requires a discrete GPU
- X99 platform is legacy with limited future CPU options
- PCIe lane count lower than 40-lane Broadwell-E SKUs
- Launch price higher than newer, more efficient options
Pros
- 10 cores and 20 threads for multi‑threaded workloads.
- 44 PCIe 3.0 lanes for multi‑GPU and NVMe arrays.
- Quad‑channel DDR4‑2666 up to 128 GB.
- Unlocked multiplier with granular overclocking controls.
- Turbo Boost Max 3.0 favors best cores for lightly‑threaded tasks.
- Good used‑market value for I/O‑heavy builds.
Cons
- High 165 W TDP and relatively low efficiency versus modern CPUs.
- 14 nm process shows its age in power and clock scaling.
- No integrated graphics; discrete GPU required.
- Discontinued platform with no upgrade path beyond LGA2066/X299.
- Newer mainstream and HEDT CPUs often outperform it per dollar and per watt.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-6800K
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600XRival
Mainstream Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 1700Rival
Creator
- AMD Ryzen 7 1800XRival
Enthusiast
- Intel Core i7-6700KRival
Mainstream Gaming
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-5820KRival
Previous-Gen HEDT
- Intel Core i7-7820XAlt
More cores and higher PCIe lane count on the newer X299 platform.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800XAlt
Much higher single-thread performance and efficiency on AM4.
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900XAlt
12 cores and 24 threads with strong performance per watt.
- Intel Core i7-14700KAlt
Modern DDR5 platform with more cores and features for new builds.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950XAlt
Cutting-edge multi-threaded performance and PCIe 5.0 support.
Intel Core i9-9820X
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950XRival
HEDT
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920XRival
HEDT
- RivalCompare head-to-head
- RivalCompare head-to-head
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900XRival
High-End Desktop
Same LGA2066 platform with 12 cores and slightly better multi‑threaded performance if you’re already on X299.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XAlt
Much higher core count and memory bandwidth for serious workstation use, though more expensive and power‑hungry.
Better gaming and single‑thread performance on a mainstream platform, but fewer PCIe lanes and memory channels.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i7-14700KAlt
Modern hybrid architecture with strong gaming and creator performance, but again with fewer I/O lanes than X299.
Our Verdict on Each
A capable entry point into X99 HEDT with solid multi-threading and PCIe headroom, now best suited to budget used builds or specialized workloads rather than new gaming rigs.
Best for: Budget-conscious used HEDT build for multi-threaded workloads
Read the full reviewA capable 10‑core HEDT processor with strong I/O and multi‑threaded performance, but outclassed in efficiency and value by newer mainstream and HEDT platforms.
Best for: Used or clearance HEDT builds where 44 PCIe lanes and quad‑channel memory are critical and platform cost is very low.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-6800K has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-6800K (140 W), Intel Core i9-9820X (165 W).
Do Intel Core i7-6800K and Intel Core i9-9820X use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-6800K: LGA2011-v3, Intel Core i9-9820X: FCLGA2066), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i9-9820X has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i7-6800K (6 cores), Intel Core i9-9820X (10 cores).