CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4960HQ vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4960HQ is a high-performance mobile processor released in September 2013 as part of the Crystal Well family of fourth-generation Core i7 chips. Fabricated on a 22-nanometer process, this processor was tailored for premium laptops and all-in-one PCs that demand robust multi-threaded capabilities and strong integrated graphics. It features four cores and eight threads, effortlessly handling complex multitasking and demanding productivity applications. The inclusion of Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 graphics, complete with embedded DRAM, provides a substantial boost in graphical performance compared to standard integrated solutions of its era. Operating with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and a turbo boost of up to 3.8 GHz, it delivers snappy single-threaded responsiveness. Its 47-watt thermal design power strikes a balance between high-end performance and the thermal constraints of mobile form factors. Interestingly, this specific part retains an active production status for certain embedded applications.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
The 8MB cache helps with productivity tasks.
4.0 GHz turbo helps single-threaded productivity tasks.
Gaming
Good for older games, but lacks power for modern AAA titles.
Strong for 2013 games, but shows its age in modern titles.
Virtualization
Handles VMs well for legacy systems.
Capable of running multiple VMs efficiently.
Efficiency
22nm process is less efficient than modern alternatives.
High clock speeds result in high heat and power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI-specific hardware
- Slow inference
- No AI acceleration hardware
- High clocks don't compensate for lack of modern matrix math support
Content Creation
Gaming
- eDRAM helps with frame rates
- Adequate for indie games
- Not suitable for modern high-end gaming
- 4.0 GHz turbo helps CPU-heavy games
- Iris Pro eDRAM smooths textures
- Still struggles with modern AAA games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Still active for embedded markets
- 8MB L3 cache
- Strong Iris Pro integrated graphics
Cons
- Outdated 22nm process
- High 47W TDP
- Expensive if bought new for embedded use
Pros
- Hits 4.0 GHz turbo
- Strong Iris Pro graphics
- Excellent single-threaded performance for its era
Cons
- End-of-life
- Runs hot under load
- Poor power efficiency
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-4700MQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-3632QMRival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 800Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800UAlt
Vastly superior efficiency and multi-core performance.
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Alt
Modern architecture with much faster single-core speeds.
- Alt
Incredible performance per watt for mobile workstations.
Compare head-to-head Hybrid architecture offers significantly better multi-threading.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5625UAlt
Modern budget alternative with strong battery life.
Intel Core i7-4980HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-4800MQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-8800PRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3840QMRival
Mobile
- NVIDIA Tegra K1Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXAlt
Modern mobile powerhouse with vastly better efficiency.
8 cores and modern architecture obliterate this old flagship.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Incredible performance per watt for content creation.
Compare head-to-head 14 cores provide massive multi-threading gains.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HAlt
Superior integrated graphics and modern DDR5 support.
Our Verdict on Each
A robust mobile processor that still sees use in embedded systems due to its reliable 22nm architecture and eDRAM.
Best for: Industrial or legacy system replacement. When considering the purchase of a system with the Core i7-4960HQ today, the context is crucial. For modern consumer use, it is heavily outdated and outperformed by even low-tier contemporary processors. However, because it remains listed as active for embedded markets, it may still be relevant for specific industrial systems requiring legacy support. For general consumers, buying a used laptop with this CPU should only be done at a rock-bottom price. It remains functional for basic computing tasks and older games, but its power efficiency pales in comparison to current architectures. Do not invest in this platform for a primary work or gaming machine today.
Read the full reviewThe fastest Crystalwell mobile CPU, hitting 4.0 GHz, offering top-tier 2013 performance but now outclassed by modern efficiency.
Best for: Always-plugged-in secondary machine. Purchasing a system featuring the Core i7-4980HQ today is generally not recommended for new builds or primary workstations. While it was a top-tier performer in 2013, its 22nm architecture and 47W TDP mean it is significantly less efficient than modern processors. A used laptop containing this chip might still handle basic productivity, web browsing, and older games, but it will struggle with modern, demanding applications and its battery life will likely be poor due to its age. If you are considering it for a low-cost, always-plugged-in secondary machine, it may suffice. Otherwise, investing in a modern system will provide vastly superior performance, efficiency, and security features.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4960HQ or Intel Core i7-4980HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4980HQ comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4960HQ or Intel Core i7-4980HQ?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4980HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Core i7-4960HQ and Intel Core i7-4980HQ.
Do Intel Core i7-4960HQ and Intel Core i7-4980HQ use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4980HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4960HQ (8,600), Intel Core i7-4980HQ (8,900). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.