CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4870HQ vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4870HQ is a high-performance mobile processor introduced in mid-2014 as part of the fourth-generation Core i7 family, specifically utilizing the Crystalwell architecture. Built on Intel's 22-nanometer manufacturing process, this chip was designed to power premium laptops and all-in-one systems requiring substantial graphical and computational capabilities. It features four physical cores and supports eight simultaneous threads via Intel's Hyper-Threading technology, making it adept at handling demanding multitasking environments. One of its standout features is the inclusion of the Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 integrated graphics, which incorporates embedded DRAM (eDRAM) to significantly boost graphical performance and compute tasks. With a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 3.7 GHz, it balances raw speed with power efficiency, operating within a 47-watt thermal design power envelope. This processor remains a notable example of Intel's early efforts to bridge the gap between CPU and GPU performance in the mobile sector.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Adequate for standard office tasks and light content creation.
4.0 GHz turbo helps single-threaded productivity tasks.
Gaming
Handles older or less demanding games well, but struggles with modern titles.
Strong for 2013 games, but shows its age in modern titles.
Virtualization
Can handle basic VMs but limited by 47W TDP and older architecture.
Capable of running multiple VMs efficiently.
Efficiency
22nm process is inefficient compared to modern mobile chips.
High clock speeds result in high heat and power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Slow inference times
- No AI acceleration hardware
- High clocks don't compensate for lack of modern matrix math support
Content Creation
Gaming
- Good for retro gaming
- Iris Pro eDRAM helps frame rates
- Not suitable for modern AAA games
- 4.0 GHz turbo helps CPU-heavy games
- Iris Pro eDRAM smooths textures
- Still struggles with modern AAA games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Strong integrated graphics for its era
- Good multi-threaded performance
- Includes eDRAM cache
Cons
- End-of-life platform
- High TDP for mobile
- Poor efficiency by modern standards
Pros
- Hits 4.0 GHz turbo
- Strong Iris Pro graphics
- Excellent single-threaded performance for its era
Cons
- End-of-life
- Runs hot under load
- Poor power efficiency
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7500Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-4200HRival
Mobile
- NVIDIA Tegra K1Rival
Mobile
Vastly superior performance and efficiency in the mobile space.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 4600HAlt
More cores, better integrated graphics, and modern architecture.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Massive leap in single-thread speed and battery life.
- Alt
Revolutionary ARM-based efficiency and performance.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 5800UAlt
Excellent multi-core scaling and low power consumption.
Intel Core i7-4980HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-4800MQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-8800PRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3840QMRival
Mobile
- NVIDIA Tegra K1Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXAlt
Modern mobile powerhouse with vastly better efficiency.
8 cores and modern architecture obliterate this old flagship.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Incredible performance per watt for content creation.
Compare head-to-head 14 cores provide massive multi-threading gains.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HAlt
Superior integrated graphics and modern DDR5 support.
Our Verdict on Each
An innovative mobile processor for its time, offering strong integrated graphics, though outclassed by modern efficiency standards.
Best for: Buying a used laptop for basic computing or retro gaming at a heavily discounted price. Buying Advice for the Core i7-4870HQ in the modern context is straightforward: it is no longer viable for new builds, and purchasing a used laptop with this processor requires careful consideration. While it still offers respectable performance for basic productivity, web browsing, and media consumption, its age means it lacks support for modern instruction sets and efficiency improvements found in current-generation chips. If you are buying a used laptop heavily discounted, ensure the battery is healthy, as older systems degrade over time. For any serious gaming or content creation, a newer processor—even a budget modern one—will vastly outperform this aging chip. Avoid spending significant money on this platform today.
Read the full reviewThe fastest Crystalwell mobile CPU, hitting 4.0 GHz, offering top-tier 2013 performance but now outclassed by modern efficiency.
Best for: Always-plugged-in secondary machine. Purchasing a system featuring the Core i7-4980HQ today is generally not recommended for new builds or primary workstations. While it was a top-tier performer in 2013, its 22nm architecture and 47W TDP mean it is significantly less efficient than modern processors. A used laptop containing this chip might still handle basic productivity, web browsing, and older games, but it will struggle with modern, demanding applications and its battery life will likely be poor due to its age. If you are considering it for a low-cost, always-plugged-in secondary machine, it may suffice. Otherwise, investing in a modern system will provide vastly superior performance, efficiency, and security features.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4870HQ or Intel Core i7-4980HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4980HQ comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4870HQ or Intel Core i7-4980HQ?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4980HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Core i7-4870HQ and Intel Core i7-4980HQ.
Do Intel Core i7-4870HQ and Intel Core i7-4980HQ use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4980HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4870HQ (8,520), Intel Core i7-4980HQ (8,900). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.