CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4870HQ vs Intel Core i7-4950HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4870HQ is a high-performance mobile processor introduced in mid-2014 as part of the fourth-generation Core i7 family, specifically utilizing the Crystalwell architecture. Built on Intel's 22-nanometer manufacturing process, this chip was designed to power premium laptops and all-in-one systems requiring substantial graphical and computational capabilities. It features four physical cores and supports eight simultaneous threads via Intel's Hyper-Threading technology, making it adept at handling demanding multitasking environments. One of its standout features is the inclusion of the Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 integrated graphics, which incorporates embedded DRAM (eDRAM) to significantly boost graphical performance and compute tasks. With a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 3.7 GHz, it balances raw speed with power efficiency, operating within a 47-watt thermal design power envelope. This processor remains a notable example of Intel's early efforts to bridge the gap between CPU and GPU performance in the mobile sector.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Adequate for standard office tasks and light content creation.
Handles everyday tasks well, but slow by modern standards.
Gaming
Handles older or less demanding games well, but struggles with modern titles.
Competent for 2013 games, but struggles with modern titles.
Virtualization
Can handle basic VMs but limited by 47W TDP and older architecture.
Adequate for basic VM usage.
Efficiency
22nm process is inefficient compared to modern mobile chips.
High TDP and 22nm process result in poor battery life.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Slow inference times
- Lacks modern AI acceleration
- Slow compute times
Content Creation
Gaming
- Good for retro gaming
- Iris Pro eDRAM helps frame rates
- Not suitable for modern AAA games
- Iris Pro eDRAM helps textures
- Unlocked multiplier allows slight performance tuning
- Not for modern AAA gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Strong integrated graphics for its era
- Good multi-threaded performance
- Includes eDRAM cache
Cons
- End-of-life platform
- High TDP for mobile
- Poor efficiency by modern standards
Pros
- Unlocked multiplier (rare for mobile)
- Iris Pro 5200 with eDRAM
- Solid multi-threaded performance for its era
Cons
- Very poor efficiency by modern standards
- End-of-life
- Soldered to motherboard
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7500Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-4200HRival
Mobile
- NVIDIA Tegra K1Rival
Mobile
Vastly superior performance and efficiency in the mobile space.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 4600HAlt
More cores, better integrated graphics, and modern architecture.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Massive leap in single-thread speed and battery life.
- Alt
Revolutionary ARM-based efficiency and performance.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 5800UAlt
Excellent multi-core scaling and low power consumption.
Intel Core i7-4950HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-3632QMRival
Mobile
- Apple A7Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
Massive leap in efficiency and multi-core performance.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Modern single-core speeds and superior integrated graphics.
- Alt
Industry-leading performance per watt.
Compare head-to-head Better battery life and modern feature set.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Affordable modern alternative with 6 cores.
Our Verdict on Each
An innovative mobile processor for its time, offering strong integrated graphics, though outclassed by modern efficiency standards.
Best for: Buying a used laptop for basic computing or retro gaming at a heavily discounted price. Buying Advice for the Core i7-4870HQ in the modern context is straightforward: it is no longer viable for new builds, and purchasing a used laptop with this processor requires careful consideration. While it still offers respectable performance for basic productivity, web browsing, and media consumption, its age means it lacks support for modern instruction sets and efficiency improvements found in current-generation chips. If you are buying a used laptop heavily discounted, ensure the battery is healthy, as older systems degrade over time. For any serious gaming or content creation, a newer processor—even a budget modern one—will vastly outperform this aging chip. Avoid spending significant money on this platform today.
Read the full reviewAn important step forward for mobile integrated graphics, offering unique overclocking potential, but now obsolete.
Best for: Purchasing a used laptop at a rock-bottom price. Buying advice for the Core i7-4950HQ today suggests avoiding significant investment. While it was a formidable processor in its prime, modern applications and operating systems demand greater efficiency and newer instruction sets. If you encounter a used laptop featuring this chip at a very low price, it can still serve adequately for web browsing, office tasks, and media playback. However, its 47-watt TDP and older 22nm process mean it will run warmer and consume more power than modern equivalents. For gaming or content creation, its integrated graphics, while historically significant, no longer meet modern baseline requirements. Save your budget for a newer system that offers better longevity.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4870HQ or Intel Core i7-4950HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4870HQ comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4870HQ or Intel Core i7-4950HQ?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4870HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 45/100 among Intel Core i7-4870HQ and Intel Core i7-4950HQ.
Do Intel Core i7-4870HQ and Intel Core i7-4950HQ use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4870HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4870HQ (8,520), Intel Core i7-4950HQ (8,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.