CPU Comparison
Core i7-3840QM vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-3840QM (Socket G2 variant) is a premium mobile processor released in 2012, leveraging the Ivy Bridge architecture. Operating at 2.8 GHz with a turbo boost up to 3.8 GHz, it features 4 cores and 8 threads to handle demanding mobile workloads. This PGA version utilizes the Socket G2 (988B) interface, a departure from the soldered BGA counterpart, allowing for socketed installation in thicker, upgradeable gaming and workstation laptops. Built on a 22nm process, it packs 1.4 billion transistors into a 160 mm² die and maintains a 45W TDP. The processor includes 8MB of L3 cache to accelerate data retrieval. It is equipped with Intel HD Graphics 4000, offering DirectX 11 support and decent graphical fidelity for integrated graphics of its era. This model was highly favored by enthusiasts who preferred the ability to swap out CPUs, a feature becoming increasingly rare in modern laptops. It supports dual-channel DDR3 memory and PCIe 3.0, ensuring solid system responsiveness for 2012-era high-end mobile computing.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles older productivity suites and web browsing fine.
4.0 GHz turbo helps single-threaded productivity tasks.
Gaming
Adequate for 2012 games, but lacks power for modern AAA titles.
Strong for 2013 games, but shows its age in modern titles.
Virtualization
Good support for light virtualization on the go.
Capable of running multiple VMs efficiently.
Efficiency
45W TDP was efficient then, but runs hot compared to modern mobile chips.
High clock speeds result in high heat and power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No NPU or AI hardware
- Unsupported by modern AI software
- No AI acceleration hardware
- High clocks don't compensate for lack of modern matrix math support
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4000 insufficient for modern games
- Pairs well with mobile GTX 600M series
- Good for indie and legacy titles
- 4.0 GHz turbo helps CPU-heavy games
- Iris Pro eDRAM smooths textures
- Still struggles with modern AAA games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Socketed design allows upgrades
- Strong multi-core performance for 2012
- PCIe 3.0 support
- VT-d virtualization support
Cons
- Highly outdated architecture
- Lacks AVX2 support
- 45W TDP is hot for modern laptops
- Weak integrated graphics
Pros
- Hits 4.0 GHz turbo
- Strong Iris Pro graphics
- Excellent single-threaded performance for its era
Cons
- End-of-life
- Runs hot under load
- Poor power efficiency
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-3840QM
- AMD A10-4600MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3940XMAlt
Unlocked Extreme Edition for Socket G2.
More budget-friendly Ivy Bridge mobile option.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-4980HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-4800MQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-8800PRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3840QMRival
Mobile
- NVIDIA Tegra K1Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXAlt
Modern mobile powerhouse with vastly better efficiency.
8 cores and modern architecture obliterate this old flagship.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Incredible performance per watt for content creation.
Compare head-to-head 14 cores provide massive multi-threading gains.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HAlt
Superior integrated graphics and modern DDR5 support.
Our Verdict on Each
A rare socketed high-end mobile CPU that offered excellent performance and upgrade paths for 2012 laptops, though it is heavily outdated today.
Best for: Upgrading an old Socket G2 laptop.
Read the full reviewThe fastest Crystalwell mobile CPU, hitting 4.0 GHz, offering top-tier 2013 performance but now outclassed by modern efficiency.
Best for: Always-plugged-in secondary machine. Purchasing a system featuring the Core i7-4980HQ today is generally not recommended for new builds or primary workstations. While it was a top-tier performer in 2013, its 22nm architecture and 47W TDP mean it is significantly less efficient than modern processors. A used laptop containing this chip might still handle basic productivity, web browsing, and older games, but it will struggle with modern, demanding applications and its battery life will likely be poor due to its age. If you are considering it for a low-cost, always-plugged-in secondary machine, it may suffice. Otherwise, investing in a modern system will provide vastly superior performance, efficiency, and security features.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-3840QM or Intel Core i7-4980HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-3840QM comes out ahead with a score of 7.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-3840QM or Intel Core i7-4980HQ?
For gaming, the Core i7-3840QM leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Core i7-3840QM and Intel Core i7-4980HQ.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-3840QM has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-3840QM (45 W), Intel Core i7-4980HQ (47 W).
Do Core i7-3840QM and Intel Core i7-4980HQ use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-3840QM: Intel Socket G2 (988B), Intel Core i7-4980HQ: Intel BGA 1364), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4980HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i7-3840QM (8,100), Intel Core i7-4980HQ (8,900). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.