CPU Comparison

Core i7-2860QM (BGA) vs Core i7-2920XM

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-2860QM BGA 1224 variant offers the same top-tier Sandy Bridge mobile performance but in a soldered form factor. With 4 cores and 8 threads, it operates at a base clock of 2.5 GHz and boosts up to 3.6 GHz. This processor was designed for premium, thin-and-light laptops where space was at a premium, and the CPU could not be socketed. The 32nm die houses 8MB of L3 cache, providing excellent performance for 2011-era applications. It supports dual-channel DDR3 memory and features Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics. The 45W TDP is relatively high for thin laptops, meaning it was usually paired with aggressive cooling solutions. Although long discontinued, the i7-2860QM remains a potent reminder of the peak of Intel's 2nd generation mobile platform, offering solid performance for legacy tasks.

Intel · Core i7
Core i7-2860QM (BGA)
4C / 8T3.6 GHz45 W
6.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7 Extreme
Core i7-2920XM
4C / 8T3.5 GHz55 W
7
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
Mobile
Generation
2nd Gen (Sandy Bridge)
2nd Gen (Sandy Bridge)
Launched
2011
2011
Status
End-of-life
End-of-life
Codename
Sandy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Series
Core i7
Core i7 Extreme
Family
Sandy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-2820QM
Intel Core i7-940XM
Successor
Intel Core i7-3720QM
Intel Core i7-3920XM

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
8
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
TDP
45 W
55 W
Architecture
Architecture
Sandy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Process Node
32nm
32nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
32 GB
32 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel BGA 1224
Intel Socket G2 (988B)
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
Yes

Performance Compared

Productivity

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)35

High clocks make it feel snappy in basic tasks.

Core i7-2920XMBest38

High clocks and cache make it surprisingly capable for basic tasks.

Gaming

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)25

Good for older games, but HD 3000 is too weak for modern ones.

Core i7-2920XMBest28

Great for older games when overclocked, but lacks modern support.

Virtualization

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)45

Decent for basic VMs thanks to VT-x and 8MB cache.

Core i7-2920XMBest48

VT-d and high clocks make it decent for legacy VMs.

Efficiency

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)Best28

45W TDP in a thin chassis often leads to heat issues.

Core i7-2920XM20

55W TDP is very high for a mobile chip, resulting in poor battery life.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)None
  • No AI hardware
  • Lacks modern instruction sets
Core i7-2920XMNone
  • No AI hardware
  • Lacks AVX2

Content Creation

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)Poor
Basic Photo EditingLight Coding
Core i7-2920XMPoor
Basic Photo EditingLight Code Compilation

Gaming

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)Fair
  • Strong single-core for its time
  • Needs discrete GPU for 3D
  • HD 3000 is obsolete
Core i7-2920XMFair
  • Strong single-core performance
  • Needs discrete GPU
  • Runs very hot

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Moderate
Workstations
Moderate
Moderate
Content Creation
Low
Low
Virtualization
Moderate
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Web Browsing
Good
Good
Office Applications
Good
Good
1080p Video Playback
Good
Retro Gaming
Good
Very Good
Modern Gaming
Very Poor
Poor
Retro Overclocking
Excellent

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Students
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)

Pros

  • High clock speeds
  • 8MB L3 cache
  • Good for retro computing
  • Compact BGA design

Cons

  • Soldered and non-upgradable
  • 45W TDP can overheat
  • Obsolete graphics
  • No Windows 11 support
Core i7-2920XM

Pros

  • Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
  • High performance for its era
  • 8MB L3 cache
  • Socketed design

Cons

  • Very high 55W TDP
  • Runs extremely hot
  • Obsolete for modern tasks
  • Expensive collector's item

Competitors & Alternatives

Core i7-2860QM (BGA)

Core i7-2920XM

Our Verdict on Each

Excellent performance for 2011, but the soldered design limits upgradability and the age shows in modern tasks.

Best for: Repairing a legacy thin laptop

Read the full review
Core i7-2920XMSituational

A legendary mobile CPU that brought unlocked overclocking to laptops, though it runs hot and is outdated.

Best for: Upgrading a Socket G2 enthusiast laptop

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Core i7-2860QM (BGA) or Core i7-2920XM?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-2920XM comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-2860QM (BGA) or Core i7-2920XM?

For gaming, the Core i7-2920XM leads with a gaming performance score of 28/100 among Core i7-2860QM (BGA) and Core i7-2920XM.

Which uses less power?

The Core i7-2860QM (BGA) has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-2860QM (BGA) (45 W), Core i7-2920XM (55 W).

Do Core i7-2860QM (BGA) and Core i7-2920XM use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Core i7-2860QM (BGA): Intel BGA 1224, Core i7-2920XM: Intel Socket G2 (988B)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Core i7-2920XM posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i7-2860QM (BGA) (5,700), Core i7-2920XM (5,900). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.