CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-2675QM vs Core i7-2820QM (BGA)
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-2675QM is a BGA-packaged mobile processor released in late 2011 as a soldered alternative to the 2670QM. Based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, it features four cores and eight threads, delivering robust multitasking capabilities. Operating at a 2.2 GHz base clock with a 3.1 GHz turbo boost, it offered the same performance as the 2670QM but was permanently attached to the motherboard via BGA 1224. The 32nm chip integrated 1,160 million transistors and a 6MB L3 cache. With a 45W TDP, it was designed for performance-oriented laptops where space was constrained. It included Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics for everyday multimedia. While locked for overclocking, the i7-2675QM supported AVX and AES-NI, making it a highly capable and durable solution for portable systems requiring robust computational power without the need for future upgrades.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Adequate for basic tasks but slow for heavy workloads.
8MB cache helps, but 4 cores limit modern productivity suites.
Gaming
Obsolete for modern gaming; only handles old titles.
Not suitable for modern gaming; handles old casual games fine.
Virtualization
Supports VT-x but limited by locked nature.
VT-x and VT-d support basic VM tasks.
Efficiency
45W TDP is inefficient for modern mobile standards.
45W TDP is high for thin laptops, leading to heat.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Extremely slow compute
- No NPU or AI acceleration
- Lacks modern instruction sets
Content Creation
Gaming
- No AVX2 support
- HD 3000 graphics are obsolete
- Low base clock
- HD 3000 is obsolete
- Cannot run modern 3D titles
- Fine for 2D indie games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Soldered design for durability
- Good multi-threaded performance for 2011
- Hardware AES-NI support
- Reliable Sandy Bridge architecture
Cons
- Cannot be upgraded (soldered)
- 45W TDP requires active cooling
- Obsolete integrated graphics
- Lacks AVX2 support
Pros
- 8MB L3 cache
- Good performance for 2011
- Hyper-Threading
- Turbo Boost
Cons
- Soldered BGA socket
- 45W TDP
- Obsolete integrated graphics
- No Windows 11 support
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-2675QM
- AMD A8-3550MXRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2670QMRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2635QMRival
Mobile
- AMD Phenom II N950Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-2455MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3615QMAlt
Ivy Bridge successor with lower power.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200UAlt
Modern budget mobile alternative.
- Intel Core i3-3217UAlt
Lower power Ivy Bridge alternative.
- Intel Pentium 987Alt
Low power alternative for basic tasks.
Core i7-2820QM (BGA)
- AMD A8-3530MXRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2720QMRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2630QMRival
Mobile
- AMD Phenom II X4 N970Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-2540MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2860QMAlt
Higher clock speeds for better performance.
Slightly cheaper but with less cache.
Compare head-to-headIvy Bridge successor with better efficiency.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i7-2920XMAlt
Unlocked Extreme Edition for overclocking.
- AMD A10-4600MAlt
Better integrated graphics for light gaming.
Our Verdict on Each
A reliable soldered mobile CPU that offered great performance for its time, now obsolete and non-upgradable.
Best for: The Core i7-2675QM is an obsolete, soldered mobile processor that cannot be upgraded. If you own a laptop with this chip, it is still functional for basic computing, media playback, and web browsing. Adding an SSD and upgrading the RAM can significantly improve the responsiveness of the system for legacy use. However, it is completely unsuitable for modern gaming or heavy productivity tasks. If the laptop fails, it is generally not worth repairing the motherboard due to the age of the platform. For new purchases, modern laptops offer exponentially better performance, battery life, and features. The i7-2675QM should only be maintained in working devices, not sought out for new builds or repairs.
Read the full reviewA strong mobile CPU in 2011 with a large cache, but limited by its soldered design and age.
Best for: Maintaining a legacy laptop
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-2675QM or Core i7-2820QM (BGA)?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-2675QM comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-2675QM or Core i7-2820QM (BGA)?
For gaming, the Core i7-2820QM (BGA) leads with a gaming performance score of 22/100 among Intel Core i7-2675QM and Core i7-2820QM (BGA).
Do Intel Core i7-2675QM and Core i7-2820QM (BGA) use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-2675QM: BGA 1224, Core i7-2820QM (BGA): Intel BGA 1224), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-2820QM (BGA) posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-2675QM (3,900), Core i7-2820QM (BGA) (5,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.