CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-2635QM vs Core i7-2860QM (BGA)
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-2635QM is a BGA-packaged mobile processor that brought quad-core performance to thinner and more compact laptops in 2011. Based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, it features four cores and eight threads, delivering excellent multitasking capabilities. Operating at a 2.0 GHz base clock and boosting up to 2.9 GHz, it offered the same performance as the socketed i7-2630QM but was soldered directly to the motherboard via BGA 1223. The 32nm process housed 1,160 million transistors and a 6MB L3 cache. With a 45W TDP, it was designed for performance laptops rather than ultrabooks. It included Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics for everyday multimedia tasks. While lacking an unlocked multiplier, the i7-2635QM supported AVX and AES-NI, making it a powerful and permanent solution for portable systems requiring robust computational power without the need for future upgrades.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Adequate for basic tasks but slow for heavy workloads.
High clocks make it feel snappy in basic tasks.
Gaming
Obsolete for modern gaming; only handles old titles.
Good for older games, but HD 3000 is too weak for modern ones.
Virtualization
Supports VT-x but limited by locked nature.
Decent for basic VMs thanks to VT-x and 8MB cache.
Efficiency
45W TDP is inefficient for modern mobile standards.
45W TDP in a thin chassis often leads to heat issues.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Extremely slow compute
- No AI hardware
- Lacks modern instruction sets
Content Creation
Gaming
- No AVX2 support
- HD 3000 graphics are obsolete
- Low base clock
- Strong single-core for its time
- Needs discrete GPU for 3D
- HD 3000 is obsolete
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Soldered design for durability
- Good multi-threaded performance for 2011
- Hardware AES-NI support
- Reliable Sandy Bridge architecture
Cons
- Cannot be upgraded (soldered)
- 45W TDP requires active cooling
- Obsolete integrated graphics
- Lacks AVX2 support
Pros
- High clock speeds
- 8MB L3 cache
- Good for retro computing
- Compact BGA design
Cons
- Soldered and non-upgradable
- 45W TDP can overheat
- Obsolete graphics
- No Windows 11 support
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-2635QM
- AMD A8-3510MXRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2630QMRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2715QERival
Mobile
- AMD Phenom II N930Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-2435MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3612QMAlt
Ivy Bridge successor with lower power.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200UAlt
Modern budget mobile alternative.
- Intel Core i3-3217UAlt
Lower power Ivy Bridge alternative.
- Intel Pentium 987Alt
Low power alternative for basic tasks.
Core i7-2860QM (BGA)
- AMD A8-3550MXRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2820QMRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2760QMRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2920XMRival
Mobile
- AMD A10-4600MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2960XMAlt
Extreme Edition with higher clocks.
Ivy Bridge successor with better efficiency.
Compare head-to-headHigher clocked Ivy Bridge alternative.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A reliable soldered mobile CPU that offered great performance for its time, now obsolete and non-upgradable.
Best for: The Core i7-2635QM is an obsolete, soldered mobile processor that cannot be upgraded. If you own a laptop with this chip, it is still functional for basic computing, media playback, and web browsing. Adding an SSD and upgrading the RAM can significantly improve the responsiveness of the system for legacy use. However, it is completely unsuitable for modern gaming or heavy productivity tasks. If the laptop fails, it is generally not worth repairing the motherboard due to the age of the platform. For new purchases, modern laptops offer exponentially better performance, battery life, and features. The i7-2635QM should only be maintained in working devices, not sought out for new builds or repairs.
Read the full reviewExcellent performance for 2011, but the soldered design limits upgradability and the age shows in modern tasks.
Best for: Repairing a legacy thin laptop
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-2635QM or Core i7-2860QM (BGA)?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-2635QM comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-2635QM or Core i7-2860QM (BGA)?
For gaming, the Core i7-2860QM (BGA) leads with a gaming performance score of 25/100 among Intel Core i7-2635QM and Core i7-2860QM (BGA).
Do Intel Core i7-2635QM and Core i7-2860QM (BGA) use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-2635QM: BGA 1224, Core i7-2860QM (BGA): Intel BGA 1224), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-2860QM (BGA) posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-2635QM (3,700), Core i7-2860QM (BGA) (5,700). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.