CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-2630QM vs Core i7-2860QM (BGA)
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-2630QM is a widely adopted mobile processor that powered a generation of mainstream and high-end laptops in 2011. As part of the Sandy Bridge family, it features four cores and eight threads, delivering robust multitasking performance. Operating at a 2.0 GHz base clock with a 2.9 GHz turbo boost, it provided adequate speed for demanding applications while maintaining a 45W thermal envelope. Built on a 32nm process, the chip integrated 1,160 million transistors and a 6MB L3 cache. The processor utilized the Socket G2 (988B) interface, making it somewhat upgradable in certain laptop models. It included Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics, handling everyday multimedia tasks. While lacking an unlocked multiplier, the i7-2630QM supported advanced features like AES-NI and AVX, making it a versatile workhorse for students and professionals needing portable computational power without sacrificing much battery life.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Fine for basic office work but struggles with heavy web apps.
High clocks make it feel snappy in basic tasks.
Gaming
Handles old games well but bottlenecks modern GPUs.
Good for older games, but HD 3000 is too weak for modern ones.
Virtualization
Can run light VMs but limited by modern standards.
Decent for basic VMs thanks to VT-x and 8MB cache.
Efficiency
45W TDP is high, leading to poor battery life by modern standards.
45W TDP in a thin chassis often leads to heat issues.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Too slow for AI workloads
- No AI hardware
- Lacks modern instruction sets
Content Creation
Gaming
- Good for games from 2010-2014
- Lacks AVX2 for modern titles
- HD 3000 is obsolete
- Strong single-core for its time
- Needs discrete GPU for 3D
- HD 3000 is obsolete
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very popular and reliable
- Good multi-threaded performance for 2011
- Socketed design in many laptops
- Brought Sandy Bridge IPC to mobile
Cons
- 45W TDP limits battery life
- Integrated graphics are obsolete
- Lacks AVX2 support
- Base clock of 2.0 GHz is slow
Pros
- High clock speeds
- 8MB L3 cache
- Good for retro computing
- Compact BGA design
Cons
- Soldered and non-upgradable
- 45W TDP can overheat
- Obsolete graphics
- No Windows 11 support
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-2630QM
- AMD A8-3500MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2710QERival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-2410MRival
Mobile
- AMD Phenom II N930Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2670QMRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3610QMAlt
Ivy Bridge successor with better efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250UAlt
Modern budget mobile alternative.
- Intel Core i5-2450MAlt
Dual-core alternative with similar single-core speed.
- Intel Pentium Silver N5000Alt
Modern low-power alternative.
Core i7-2860QM (BGA)
- AMD A8-3550MXRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2820QMRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2760QMRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2920XMRival
Mobile
- AMD A10-4600MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2960XMAlt
Extreme Edition with higher clocks.
Ivy Bridge successor with better efficiency.
Compare head-to-headHigher clocked Ivy Bridge alternative.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A highly popular and reliable mobile CPU that brought quad-core performance to the masses, now obsolete.
Best for: The Core i7-2630QM is an obsolete processor that should not be sought out for new purchases. However, if you already own a laptop with this chip, it remains viable for basic tasks like web browsing, document editing, and media playback. In some compatible laptops, users could upgrade from an i5 to this i7, but that is no longer cost-effective. If your laptop still functions, adding an SSD and maxing out the RAM can breathe new life into it for light use. For any new computing needs, modern laptops offer vastly superior performance, battery life, and features. The i7-2630QM is best left as a component in functioning legacy devices rather than a target for upgrades.
Read the full reviewExcellent performance for 2011, but the soldered design limits upgradability and the age shows in modern tasks.
Best for: Repairing a legacy thin laptop
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-2630QM or Core i7-2860QM (BGA)?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-2630QM comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Do Intel Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-2860QM (BGA) use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-2630QM: Socket G2 (988B), Core i7-2860QM (BGA): Intel BGA 1224), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-2860QM (BGA) posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-2630QM (3,700), Core i7-2860QM (BGA) (5,700). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.