CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-11700F vs Intel Core i7-11700T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-11700F is a standard desktop processor from the Rocket Lake-S generation, launched in March 2021. It features 8 cores and 16 threads built on Intel's 14nm process. The 'F' suffix denotes the absence of integrated graphics, requiring a dedicated GPU for display output. With a base clock of 2.5 GHz and a maximum turbo of 4.9 GHz, it delivers solid performance for gaming and productivity. The processor includes 16 MB of L3 cache and supports 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes, providing excellent bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe SSDs. Operating at a 65W TDP, it balances power consumption and performance, making it suitable for mid-tower builds with adequate cooling. The 11700F is a cost-effective option for users who already own a dedicated GPU and want strong multi-core capabilities without paying extra for onboard graphics.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
8 cores handle standard productivity and multi-threaded rendering tasks efficiently.
Handles office tasks and moderate compilation well, but slows down in sustained all-core workloads.
Gaming
Performs well in modern titles, though slightly behind AMD's 5800X in heavily multi-threaded games.
The low base clock can cause stuttering in CPU-heavy games unless the turbo is aggressively sustained.
Virtualization
16 threads and AVX-512 make it a solid host for local virtual machines.
8 cores are nice, but power limits throttle heavy VM deployments.
Efficiency
The 14nm process is power-hungry compared to competing 7nm AMD chips.
Outstanding efficiency, drawing minimal power at idle and under load.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AVX-512 support aids CPU-based AI tasks
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Not suitable for heavy AI workloads due to power throttling
Content Creation
Gaming
- Strong single-core boost clocks
- PCIe 4.0 prevents GPU bottlenecks
- Requires a dedicated GPU to function
- Low base clock affects minimum FPS
- Fine for casual or older games
- Pair with a low-power GPU for best results
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Cheaper than the non-F variant
- 8 cores and 16 threads
- 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- Solid 4.9 GHz boost clock
Cons
- No integrated graphics (requires discrete GPU)
- 14nm process runs hot under load
- End-of-life LGA 1200 platform
- Locked multiplier
Pros
- Extremely low 35W TDP
- Includes 8 cores and 16 threads
- Built-in UHD 750 graphics
- Supports PCIe 4.0
Cons
- Very low base clock of 1.4 GHz
- End-of-life platform
- Overpriced compared to 65W variants
- Throttles quickly under sustained load
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-11700F
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800Rival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600XRival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-11600KFRival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-11700KFRival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700XRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i5-12400FAlt
Newer architecture, better gaming performance, and similar price.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
Better value and power efficiency.
Includes integrated graphics for system troubleshooting.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 5700XAlt
More efficient 8-core alternative.
Intel Core i7-11700T
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700GRival
Desktop APU
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GERival
Low-Power Desktop
- Intel Core i5-11400TRival
Low-Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-11700Rival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11900TRival
Low-Power Desktop
- Intel Core i5-12400TAlt
Newer architecture with better efficiency and performance.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
Better gaming performance and upgrade path.
Our Verdict on Each
A solid 8-core CPU for users who already have a dedicated GPU, offering good value, though newer 12th gen chips perform significantly better.
Best for: Upgrading an existing LGA 1200 system on a budget.
Read the full reviewGreat for specialized SFF builds needing 8 cores at 35W, but the low base clock heavily limits out-of-the-box performance compared to 65W parts.
Best for: Building a PC inside a severely thermally constrained Mini-ITX case.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-11700F or Intel Core i7-11700T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-11700F comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-11700F or Intel Core i7-11700T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-11700F leads with a gaming performance score of 82/100 among Intel Core i7-11700F and Intel Core i7-11700T.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-11700T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-11700F (65 W), Intel Core i7-11700T (35 W).
Do Intel Core i7-11700F and Intel Core i7-11700T use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1200 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.