CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-760 vs Intel Core i7-2700K

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-760 is a refreshed Lynnfield quad-core desktop processor clocked at 2.8GHz, offering improved performance over the i5-750 while maintaining the same 95W TDP.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-760
4C / 4T3.333 GHz95 W
5.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-2700K
4C / 8T3.9 GHz95 W
8.5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
Desktop
Generation
1st Gen (Nehalem derivative)
2nd Generation
Launched
2010
2011
Status
Discontinued
End-of-life
Codename
Lynnfield
Sandy Bridge
Series
Core i5
Core i7
Family
Lynnfield
Sandy Bridge
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-2600K
Successor
Intel Core i7-3770K

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
8
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost Clock
3.333 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
TDP
95 W
95 W
Architecture
Architecture
Lynnfield
Sandy Bridge
Process Node
45nm
32nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
16 GB
32 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 1155
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
None
Yes
Unlocked
No
Yes

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-76027

Noticeably faster than the i5-750 in multi-threaded tasks, but still inadequate for modern productivity.

Intel Core i7-2700KBest45

Adequate for basic office tasks and web browsing, but slow for modern rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-76014

The best Lynnfield i5 for gaming, but still cannot handle modern AAA titles.

Intel Core i7-2700KBest40

Struggles with modern AAA titles but handles older or esports games fine.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-76022

Four cores at higher clocks provide usable virtualization for lightweight VMs.

Intel Core i7-2700KBest50

Can handle light VMs with 8 threads, but lacks modern virtualization features.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-76026

95W for four 45nm cores at 2.8GHz is inefficient by modern standards.

Intel Core i7-2700KBest30

32nm process is highly inefficient by modern standards, drawing significant power.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-760

No data

Intel Core i7-2700KNone
  • No AI acceleration hardware
  • Extremely slow for any AI workloads

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-760

No data

Intel Core i7-2700KPoor
Basic Photo EditingLight 1080p Video Editing

Gaming

Intel Core i5-760Very Poor (Modern)
  • Was a capable gaming CPU in 2010-2012 with a good discrete GPU
  • Cannot run modern AAA games at playable frame rates
  • Overclocking to 4.0GHz helps slightly but does not overcome architectural limitations
Intel Core i7-2700KFair
  • Bottlenecks modern GPUs
  • Suitable for 1080p gaming with older GPUs
  • Lacks AVX2 support for newest games

Industry Impact

Gaming
High
Workstations
Moderate
Content Creation
Moderate
Virtualization
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Gaming (legacy)
Good for 2010-2013 games with discrete GPU
Overclocking
Excellent BCLK overclocking potential
Multi-Tasking
Four cores handle basic multitasking
Modern Gaming
Unusable for modern titles
Content Creation
Too slow for modern tools
Retro Gaming
Excellent
General Productivity
Good
Overclocking Projects
Excellent
Home Server
Very Good
Modern AAA Gaming
Poor

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i7-2700K

Pros

  • Legendary overclocking headroom
  • Solid IPC improvements over previous gen
  • Included integrated graphics (HD 3000)
  • Durable and long-lasting architecture
  • Large 8MB L3 cache

Cons

  • High power consumption by modern standards
  • Lacks AVX2 instructions
  • End-of-life platform (LGA 1155)
  • No native NVMe boot support
  • Integrated graphics are severely outdated

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-760

No rivals listed.

Intel Core i7-2700K

Our Verdict on Each

A solid refresh of the i5-750 that offered meaningful performance improvements. The best Lynnfield i5 for gamers, though entirely obsolete today.

Read the full review

A legendary CPU that still holds up for basic tasks, offering incredible historical value and overclocking fun.

Best for: The Core i7-2700K is no longer recommended for new PC builds due to its age and lack of modern feature support, such as native NVMe storage booting and modern PCIe standards. However, for users already operating on an LGA 1155 motherboard looking to squeeze more life out of an older system, finding a used 2700K can be a highly cost-effective upgrade path. It still handles basic computing, media consumption, and older game titles reasonably well. If you are building a system from scratch, modern alternatives offer vastly superior power efficiency, single-core speed, and platform features. Collectors and retro gaming enthusiasts might specifically value the chip for its historical significance, but mainstream buyers should look toward newer generations for a balanced, future-proof computing experience.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-760 or Intel Core i7-2700K?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-2700K comes out ahead with a score of 8.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-760 or Intel Core i7-2700K?

For gaming, the Intel Core i7-2700K leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Core i5-760 and Intel Core i7-2700K.

Do Intel Core i5-760 and Intel Core i7-2700K use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-760: LGA 1156, Intel Core i7-2700K: LGA 1155), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-760 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-760 (7,250), Intel Core i7-2700K (5,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.