CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4570TE vs Core i7-660UE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4570TE is a specialized, embedded-focused dual-core processor from the Haswell generation, released in June 2013. Operating on a 22 nm process, it features two cores and four threads, with a base clock of 2.7 GHz and a turbo boost of 3.3 GHz. What differentiates the 4570TE from the standard 4570T is its target market; the 'TE' suffix denotes a focus on embedded systems, digital signage, and industrial applications. It carries a 35 W TDP, ensuring reliable operation in always-on, thermally constrained environments. The processor comes with 4 MB of L3 cache and Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics. While its raw performance is modest by modern standards, its longevity and stability are key selling points. It was designed for systems requiring long-term availability, making it a common sight in kiosks, point-of-sale terminals, and specialized industrial equipment where consistent performance over years is required.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Adequate for basic kiosk software and legacy office apps.
Adequate for specific embedded tasks but slow for general OS navigation today.
Gaming
Not intended for gaming; HD 4600 is too weak.
Not intended for gaming; lacks modern API support.
Virtualization
Not designed for virtualization workloads.
VT-x support is present, but limited cores restrict VM density.
Efficiency
Excellent thermal efficiency for always-on operation.
Excellent efficiency for 2010 embedded standards.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Unsuitable for AI workloads
- No AI capabilities
- Designed well before AI integration
Content Creation
Gaming
- Not designed for gaming
- Weak integrated graphics
- Low core count
- Legacy IGP only
- Insufficient for 3D workloads
- Not targeted at consumers
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Designed for 24/7 reliability
- Low 35W TDP
- Good for legacy industrial software
- Socketed LGA 1150 design
Cons
- Very outdated performance
- Dual-core only
- DDR3 memory support
- Hard to find in consumer channels
Pros
- ECC memory support
- Long embedded lifecycle
- Low 18W TDP
- Hardware virtualization (VT-d)
Cons
- Obsolete performance
- Soldered BGA package
- Limited availability
- Expensive for its performance
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4570TE
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570TRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i7-4770TERival
Embedded
- AMD Embedded R-SeriesRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i3-4330TERival
Embedded
- AMD A10-6700TRival
Low Power Desktop
Modern embedded chip with vastly better efficiency.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BAlt
Superior embedded alternative with Vega graphics.
Newer embedded platform with 6 cores.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Cheap consumer alternative if socket compatibility isn't needed.
- Intel N100Alt
Massively more efficient for basic kiosk tasks.
Core i7-660UE
- AMD Embedded G-T56NRival
Embedded ULV
- Intel Atom D525Rival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-610ERival
Embedded
- AMD Turion II Neo K625Rival
Embedded ULV
- Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600Rival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-660UMAlt
Consumer alternative if ECC is not required.
- Intel Core i5-430UEAlt
Lower cost embedded alternative.
- AMD Embedded G-T40NAlt
AMD alternative for low-power embedded systems.
- Intel Core i7-2617UEAlt
Newer generation embedded alternative.
Our Verdict on Each
Reliable for legacy industrial use, but completely unsuited for modern consumer desktop computing.
Best for: Purchasing a Core i5-4570TE today is an unusual proposition for the average consumer. It should only be sought if you are repairing a specific piece of industrial equipment or embedded system that requires this exact socket and chip. For general computing, it is obsolete and offers poor value compared to modern alternatives. If you are building a DIY project and find one extremely cheap, it can serve as a basic low-power server or a retro computing node, but its dual-core limitations are severe. Do not expect it to handle modern multitasking well. Furthermore, ensure that your motherboard supports the 'TE' variant, as some BIOS versions might not recognize embedded SKUs properly. For anyone looking to build a new system, even the lowest-tier modern processors will vastly outperform this aging chip in every metric, including power efficiency.
Read the full reviewA reliable embedded chip for its era, offering ECC support and low power consumption for mission-critical applications.
Best for: Replacing a failed chip in legacy industrial hardware
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4570TE or Core i7-660UE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-660UE comes out ahead with a score of 6.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4570TE or Core i7-660UE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4570TE leads with a gaming performance score of 20/100 among Intel Core i5-4570TE and Core i7-660UE.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-660UE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4570TE (35 W), Core i7-660UE (18 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4570TE and Core i7-660UE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4570TE: Intel Socket 1150 (LGA1150), Core i7-660UE: Intel BGA 1288), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4570TE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4570TE (3,600). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.