CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4570T vs Intel Core i5-4590S
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4570T is a low-power desktop processor launched in June 2013 as part of the Haswell generation. Built on a 22 nm manufacturing process, it features a dual-core design with Hyper-Threading, allowing it to process four threads simultaneously. With a base clock of 2.9 GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 3.6 GHz, it delivers snappy single-threaded performance suitable for everyday computing tasks. What sets the 4570T apart is its 35 W TDP, significantly lower than the standard 84 W of typical Haswell desktop chips. This makes it ideal for small form factor (SFF) PCs, home theater PCs (HTPCs), and All-in-One systems where thermal constraints and noise levels are critical. It includes 4 MB of L3 cache and integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600. While not designed for heavy workloads, it provides a reliable, cool, and quiet computing experience for mainstream users.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Good single-core speed helps office apps, but dual-core limits heavy multitasking.
Solid for everyday office apps and web browsing.
Gaming
HD 4600 graphics are insufficient for anything beyond very old or 2D games.
Handles older games fine but bottlenecks modern mid-range GPUs.
Virtualization
Limited core count makes running VMs sluggish.
Limited to light VM usage.
Efficiency
Excellent efficiency for a desktop chip, running very cool.
Excellent power-to-performance ratio for its era.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Unsuitable for modern AI workloads
- No AI acceleration
- Unsuitable for modern AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- Intel HD 4600 is too weak for modern gaming
- Can handle retro or 2D indie games
- Shares system memory
- Requires a dedicated GPU
- Pairs well with GTX 1050 Ti or RX 570
- Will struggle with modern CPU-bound titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very low 35W TDP for a desktop chip
- High turbo boost for single-threaded tasks
- Uses socketed LGA 1150
- Runs very cool and quiet
Cons
- Only 2 physical cores
- Obsolete DDR3 memory support
- Weak integrated graphics
- Locked multiplier
Pros
- Low 65W TDP
- Decent single-core performance for legacy apps
- Affordable used drop-in upgrade
- Intel HD 4600 graphics included
- Good for basic office and HTPC use
Cons
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- Locked multiplier
- No official Windows 11 support
- Bottlenecks modern GPUs
- Limited to 4 threads
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4570T
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570Rival
Desktop
- AMD A10-6800KRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i3-4340Rival
Desktop
- AMD A8-6600KRival
Desktop
Modern quad-core with vastly superior single-thread performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
Better integrated graphics and modern platform.
Cheap hex-core for budget desktop builds.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Excellent value and multi-threaded performance.
- Intel Pentium G4560Alt
Older but much cheaper dual-core alternative.
Intel Core i5-4590S
- AMD FX-8350Rival
High-End Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4590Rival
Standard Desktop
- AMD FX-8320ERival
Low Power Desktop
- Intel Core i3-4370Rival
Budget Desktop
Newer Haswell Refresh with slightly higher clocks.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i7-4790SAlt
Hyper-threaded efficient alternative.
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200GAlt
Modern budget APU alternative.
Modern budget hexa-core alternative.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Alt
Modern budget hexa-core alternative.
Our Verdict on Each
An efficient and cool-running chip for its time, but severely outdated by modern dual-core standards.
Best for: If you are considering the Core i5-4570T today, it should only be for upgrading an existing LGA 1150 system where your current chip is failing, or for building a very basic retro or office PC using salvaged parts. It holds no value for new purchases due to its age and lack of modern feature support. If found cheaply, it can serve as a capable home server or HTPC processor, handling media streaming and basic network tasks adequately. However, its dual-core limitation will be a bottleneck for modern web browsing with heavy scripts. Do not spend more than a few dollars on this processor. Anyone building a new system should look toward modern 12th or 13th Gen Intel alternatives, or AMD's Ryzen series, which offer vastly superior efficiency and performance.
Read the full reviewA solid Haswell Refresh chip that slightly improves clocks over the 4570S while maintaining 65W efficiency.
Best for: Drop-in upgrade for an older LGA 1150 motherboard.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4570T or Intel Core i5-4590S?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4590S comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4570T or Intel Core i5-4590S?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4590S leads with a gaming performance score of 48/100 among Intel Core i5-4570T and Intel Core i5-4590S.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-4570T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4570T (35 W), Intel Core i5-4590S (65 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4570T and Intel Core i5-4590S use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4570T: Intel Socket 1150 (LGA1150), Intel Core i5-4590S: LGA 1150), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i5-4590S has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-4570T (2 cores), Intel Core i5-4590S (4 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4570T posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4570T (3,800), Intel Core i5-4590S (3,700). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.