CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-4288U vs Intel Core i7-4870HQ

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4288U is a 4th generation Haswell dual-core mobile processor introduced in 2013, featuring a 28W TDP and Intel HD Graphics 5100 for premium thin-and-light laptops.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-4288U
2C / 4T3.1 GHz28 W
6.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
4C / 8T3.7 GHz47 W
7
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
Mobile
Generation
4th Gen Core i5
4th Gen Core i7 (Crystal Well)
Launched
2013
2014
Status
End-of-life
End-of-life
Codename
Haswell
Crystalwell
Series
Core i5
Core i7
Family
4th Generation
4th Gen Crystal Well
Predecessor
Intel Core i5-3427U
Core i7-4750HQ
Successor
Intel Core i5-5257U
Broadwell mobile series

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
8
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
3 MB
6 MB
TDP
28 W
47 W
Architecture
Architecture
Haswell
Crystalwell
Process Node
22nm
22nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1600
1600 MT/s
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
16 GB
32 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel BGA 1168
Intel BGA 1364
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-4288U45

Dual-core performance is sufficient for basic document editing and web browsing, but shows its age under heavy load.

Intel Core i7-4870HQBest55

Adequate for standard office tasks and light content creation.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-4288U40

Can handle older or lightweight games like Minecraft or CS:GO at 720p/1080p, but struggles with modern titles.

Intel Core i7-4870HQBest45

Handles older or less demanding games well, but struggles with modern titles.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-4288U30

Limited to very light virtual machine workloads due to the dual-core design.

Intel Core i7-4870HQBest50

Can handle basic VMs but limited by 47W TDP and older architecture.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-4288UBest60

The 22nm process and 28W TDP provide reasonable battery life for older laptops.

Intel Core i7-4870HQ30

22nm process is inefficient compared to modern mobile chips.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-4288UPoor
  • No AI acceleration hardware
  • Dual-core CPU limits any modern inference tasks
Intel Core i7-4870HQPoor
  • No dedicated AI hardware
  • Slow inference times

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-4288UPoor
Basic Audio EditingLight Photo Retouching
Intel Core i7-4870HQModerate
Adobe Premiere Pro (1080p)PhotoshopLight CAD

Gaming

Intel Core i5-4288UPoor
  • HD 5100 was good for 2013 but is obsolete today
  • Lacks modern API support like DirectX 12_1
  • Suitable only for retro or extremely light gaming
Intel Core i7-4870HQFair
  • Good for retro gaming
  • Iris Pro eDRAM helps frame rates
  • Not suitable for modern AAA games

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Moderate
Workstations
Low
Low
Content Creation
Moderate
Moderate
Virtualization
Low
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

Web Browsing
Good
Excellent
Office Applications
Very Good
1080p Video Playback
Excellent
Indie Gaming
Moderate
Photo Editing
Moderate
1080p Video Editing
Good
Casual Gaming
Very Good
Programming
Very Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-4288U

Pros

  • Good integrated graphics for its era
  • 28W TDP offers better sustained performance than 15W chips
  • Supports Hyper-Threading
  • Solid single-thread performance for basic tasks

Cons

  • Only 2 physical cores
  • End-of-life and unsupported by modern OS standards
  • Soldered to motherboard (BGA)
  • Limited to DDR3 memory
  • Weak by modern mobile standards
Intel Core i7-4870HQ

Pros

  • Strong integrated graphics for its era
  • Good multi-threaded performance
  • Includes eDRAM cache

Cons

  • End-of-life platform
  • High TDP for mobile
  • Poor efficiency by modern standards

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-4288U

  • AMD A10-5757M

    Mobile APU

    Rival
  • Intel Core i7-4650U

    Mobile

    Rival
  • AMD A8-5557M

    Mobile APU

    Rival
  • Compare head-to-head
  • AMD A6-5357M

    Mobile APU

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-8250U
    Alt

    A much faster 8th gen mobile chip with 4 cores that can be found in cheap used laptops.

  • AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
    Alt

    A budget modern mobile alternative with better Vega graphics.

  • A modern dual-core that massively outperforms this chip in single and multi-core.

    Compare head-to-head
  • If looking at older MacBooks, the M1 offers a revolutionary leap in performance and battery.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
    Alt

    A modern hexa-core mobile chip offering immense value in the used market.

Intel Core i7-4870HQ

  • AMD A10-5750M

    Mobile

    Rival
  • Compare head-to-head
  • AMD FX-7500

    Mobile

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-4200H

    Mobile

    Rival
  • NVIDIA Tegra K1

    Mobile

    Rival
  • Vastly superior performance and efficiency in the mobile space.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
    Alt

    More cores, better integrated graphics, and modern architecture.

  • Intel Core i7-1165G7
    Alt

    Massive leap in single-thread speed and battery life.

  • Revolutionary ARM-based efficiency and performance.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
    Alt

    Excellent multi-core scaling and low power consumption.

Our Verdict on Each

A capable processor for its time that brought console-class integrated graphics to thin laptops, though it is heavily outdated by modern standards.

Best for: Purchasing a very cheap, used laptop strictly for basic web browsing or as a typewriter.

Read the full review

An innovative mobile processor for its time, offering strong integrated graphics, though outclassed by modern efficiency standards.

Best for: Buying a used laptop for basic computing or retro gaming at a heavily discounted price. Buying Advice for the Core i7-4870HQ in the modern context is straightforward: it is no longer viable for new builds, and purchasing a used laptop with this processor requires careful consideration. While it still offers respectable performance for basic productivity, web browsing, and media consumption, its age means it lacks support for modern instruction sets and efficiency improvements found in current-generation chips. If you are buying a used laptop heavily discounted, ensure the battery is healthy, as older systems degrade over time. For any serious gaming or content creation, a newer processor—even a budget modern one—will vastly outperform this aging chip. Avoid spending significant money on this platform today.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-4288U or Intel Core i7-4870HQ?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4870HQ comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4288U or Intel Core i7-4870HQ?

For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4870HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 45/100 among Intel Core i5-4288U and Intel Core i7-4870HQ.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i5-4288U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4288U (28 W), Intel Core i7-4870HQ (47 W).

Do Intel Core i5-4288U and Intel Core i7-4870HQ use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4288U: Intel BGA 1168, Intel Core i7-4870HQ: Intel BGA 1364), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which has more cores?

The Intel Core i7-4870HQ has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-4288U (2 cores), Intel Core i7-4870HQ (4 cores).

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i7-4870HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4870HQ (8,520). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.