CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-1185G7E
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is a 2-core, 4-thread embedded mobile processor featuring Willow Cove architecture, UHD Graphics G4 (48EU), and an IPU 6.0, designed for industrial edge computing and embedded visual systems.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles the UI and logic for single-purpose embedded systems well, but not suited for general productivity.
Snappy single-thread performance handles specific industrial applications efficiently.
Gaming
Not designed or intended for gaming applications.
Not intended for gaming, but Iris Xe can handle basic visualization loads easily.
Virtualization
Two cores are insufficient for meaningful virtualization in embedded environments.
Adequate for lightweight edge virtualization tasks.
Efficiency
Highly efficient for always-on industrial environments, especially when power-capped at 12 W.
15W TDP ensures excellent performance per watt for embedded devices.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- The IPU 6.0 is specifically designed to accelerate edge vision and AI inference workloads
- Lacks the NPU power of modern dedicated edge AI chips but is sufficient for basic classification tasks
- DLBoost accelerates AI tasks
- IPU 6.0 not present on this specific SKU
- Suitable for edge AI inference
Content Creation
Gaming
- This is an embedded processor, gaming performance is not a relevant metric
- Not targeted at gaming
- Graphics capable of basic 3D rendering
- Dependent on memory configuration
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- IPU 6.0 provides dedicated hardware acceleration for edge vision tasks
- Embedded validation ensures long-term availability and reliability
- Configurable TDP down to 12 W for fanless industrial designs
- Low 2-core power draw is ideal for compact edge devices
- UHD G4 48EU graphics handle multi-display signage well
Cons
- Only 2 physical cores limit general compute performance
- Restricted to 4 PCIe lanes, limiting expansion options
- Not available through consumer retail channels
- No DDR5 support
- High launch price of $285 for a 2-core chip reflects embedded margins
Pros
- 15-year extended lifecycle support
- Low 15W base TDP
- Excellent single-thread performance
- Iris Xe 96EU graphics
- 10nm SuperFin efficiency
Cons
- Only 4 cores
- Low base clock (1.8 GHz)
- Limited PCIe lanes (4x)
- Not suitable for consumer builds
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-1115G4E
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250UERival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UERival
Performance Embedded
- Intel N100Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin NanoRival
Edge AI
- Qualcomm QCS6490Rival
ARM Edge
- Intel Core i5-1135G7EAlt
A higher-end embedded Tiger Lake option with 4 cores for more demanding industrial applications.
- AMD Ryzen R1606GAlt
An alternative embedded APU for ruggedized industrial PCs.
Core i7-1185G7E
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718ERival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-10700TERival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544Rival
Embedded
- Intel Atom x6425ERival
Embedded
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin NanoRival
Edge AI
Lower cost embedded alternative.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546Alt
More cores for edge workloads.
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Alt
Consumer version with higher base TDP.
- Intel Xeon D-2700Alt
Server-class edge features.
Our Verdict on Each
A specialized embedded processor that trades standard PCIe lanes and core count for industrial features like the IPU 6.0 and long-term availability, targeting specific edge AI and vision use cases.
Best for: The i3-1115G4E is strictly a business-to-business component purchased by OEMs and system integrators through Intel's embedded channels. You should specify this processor if you are designing an industrial edge device that requires the IPU 6.0 for machine vision, needs guaranteed 7+ year component availability, and operates in an environment where a 12W to 28W power envelope is mandatory. Do not buy this for a consumer laptop or desktop build, as it lacks the PCIe lanes and core count for general computing, and it cannot be purchased through normal retail channels anyway.
Read the full reviewAn excellent embedded processor combining 10nm efficiency, strong single-thread performance, and long-term availability for critical infrastructure.
Best for: Designing medical, retail, or industrial equipment requiring long-term availability.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-1115G4E or Core i7-1185G7E?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1185G7E comes out ahead with a score of 8.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-1115G4E or Core i7-1185G7E?
For gaming, the Core i7-1185G7E leads with a gaming performance score of 65/100 among Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Core i7-1185G7E.
Do Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Core i7-1185G7E use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the BGA 1449 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Core i7-1185G7E has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i3-1115G4E (2 cores), Core i7-1185G7E (4 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-1185G7E posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-1115G4E (4,600), Core i7-1185G7E (5,800). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.