CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs Intel Core i3-1125G4
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is a 2-core, 4-thread embedded mobile processor featuring Willow Cove architecture, UHD Graphics G4 (48EU), and an IPU 6.0, designed for industrial edge computing and embedded visual systems.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles the UI and logic for single-purpose embedded systems well, but not suited for general productivity.
Four cores handle office suites, video conferencing, and moderate multitasking with ease.
Gaming
Not designed or intended for gaming applications.
The Iris Xe GPU can handle e-sports titles like League of Legends and CS:GO at 1080p low, but it is not meant for modern AAA gaming.
Virtualization
Two cores are insufficient for meaningful virtualization in embedded environments.
Can run a single lightweight virtual machine or Docker containers, but 8 threads limit heavy virtualization.
Efficiency
Highly efficient for always-on industrial environments, especially when power-capped at 12 W.
Excellent power efficiency when paired with LPDDR4X memory, allowing for long battery life in ultrabooks.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- The IPU 6.0 is specifically designed to accelerate edge vision and AI inference workloads
- Lacks the NPU power of modern dedicated edge AI chips but is sufficient for basic classification tasks
- No dedicated NPU
- DLBoost provides some AI inference acceleration but is largely superseded by modern standards
Content Creation
Gaming
- This is an embedded processor, gaming performance is not a relevant metric
- Playable frame rates in older e-sports titles at 1080p low settings
- Not suitable for modern AAA games
- Performance varies heavily based on laptop cooling and cTDP settings
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- IPU 6.0 provides dedicated hardware acceleration for edge vision tasks
- Embedded validation ensures long-term availability and reliability
- Configurable TDP down to 12 W for fanless industrial designs
- Low 2-core power draw is ideal for compact edge devices
- UHD G4 48EU graphics handle multi-display signage well
Cons
- Only 2 physical cores limit general compute performance
- Restricted to 4 PCIe lanes, limiting expansion options
- Not available through consumer retail channels
- No DDR5 support
- High launch price of $285 for a 2-core chip reflects embedded margins
Pros
- 4 cores and 8 threads provide solid multitasking capability
- Iris Xe-LP graphics are highly capable for integrated silicon
- Configurable TDP allows balance between battery life and performance
- Supports both DDR4 and power-efficient LPDDR4X
- PCIe 4.0 support for fast storage
Cons
- Now end-of-life and superseded by 12th-gen parts
- Single-thread performance is lower than newer Alder Lake chips
- No hybrid core architecture like subsequent generations
- 28 W PL2 is relatively low for sustained performance bursts
- Only 8 threads limit heavy professional workloads
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-1115G4E
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250UERival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UERival
Performance Embedded
- Intel N100Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin NanoRival
Edge AI
- Qualcomm QCS6490Rival
ARM Edge
- Intel Core i5-1135G7EAlt
A higher-end embedded Tiger Lake option with 4 cores for more demanding industrial applications.
- AMD Ryzen R1606GAlt
An alternative embedded APU for ruggedized industrial PCs.
Intel Core i3-1125G4
- AMD Ryzen 3 5400URival
Mainstream Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500URival
Performance Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-1135G7Rival
Premium Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
ARM Premium Laptop
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2Rival
Always Connected PC
The direct 12th-gen successor featuring hybrid P-cores and E-cores for much better multi-threaded performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
An 8-core option for users needing maximum battery life and multi-core performance in a thin laptop.
Our Verdict on Each
A specialized embedded processor that trades standard PCIe lanes and core count for industrial features like the IPU 6.0 and long-term availability, targeting specific edge AI and vision use cases.
Best for: The i3-1115G4E is strictly a business-to-business component purchased by OEMs and system integrators through Intel's embedded channels. You should specify this processor if you are designing an industrial edge device that requires the IPU 6.0 for machine vision, needs guaranteed 7+ year component availability, and operates in an environment where a 12W to 28W power envelope is mandatory. Do not buy this for a consumer laptop or desktop build, as it lacks the PCIe lanes and core count for general computing, and it cannot be purchased through normal retail channels anyway.
Read the full reviewThe i3-1125G4 was an excellent mainstream mobile processor in 2021, bringing 4 cores and 8 threads to the i3 laptop tier alongside a significant iGPU upgrade, though it has since been surpassed by 12th-gen parts.
Best for: You should only consider buying a laptop with the i3-1125G4 today if it is being offered at a significant, heavily discounted clearance price. At launch, it was a fantastic chip for students and office workers, offering enough power for daily tasks and capable integrated graphics. However, as an end-of-life product, paying standard retail pricing for it is unwise. The newer 12th-generation i3-1215U offers hybrid P-cores and E-cores for similar money, providing much better performance and longevity. If you find a used 1125G4 laptop incredibly cheap, it remains a perfectly viable machine for web browsing and document editing.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-1115G4E or Intel Core i3-1125G4?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-1125G4 comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-1115G4E or Intel Core i3-1125G4?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-1125G4 leads with a gaming performance score of 35/100 among Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Intel Core i3-1125G4.
Do Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Intel Core i3-1125G4 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the BGA 1449 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i3-1125G4 has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i3-1115G4E (2 cores), Intel Core i3-1125G4 (4 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-1125G4 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-1115G4E (4,600), Intel Core i3-1125G4 (8,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.