CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-10325 vs Core i5-11400
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-10325 is a specialized 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor from the Comet Lake-R generation, released in March 2021. While architecturally identical to the earlier Comet Lake parts, the "-R" suffix denoted a refresh specifically targeted at OEMs to extend the lifespan of the LGA 1200 platform just as Intel was launching its 11th-generation Rocket Lake processors. It featured a notable clock speed bump, operating at a 3.9 GHz base frequency and boosting up to 4.7 GHz. Unlike many other i3 parts that were limited to older chipsets, the i3-10325 carried official support for both Intel 400-series and 500-series chipsets, making it highly flexible for system integrators. It maintained a 65W PL1 power limit with a 90W PL2 boost limit, paired with 8MB of L3 cache, dual-channel DDR4-2666 memory support, and the aging UHD Graphics 630. It also notably included Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions), a feature aimed at enterprise security. This made it a reliable, cost-effective drop-in upgrade for businesses looking to modernize fleet hardware without completely overhauling their motherboard inventories.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
The high boost clock makes everyday office tasks feel extremely responsive, though DDR4-2666 limits heavy data crunching.
Handles everyday multitasking and creator workloads efficiently.
Gaming
Slightly better single-core speed than the 10320, but still requires a discrete GPU and is bottlenecked by PCIe 3.0.
Excellent gaming performance, minimizing bottlenecks for RTX 3060/RX 6600 class GPUs.
Virtualization
8 threads are usable for a light VM setup, but the 65W TDP limits sustained virtualization performance.
Good for running light virtual machines.
Efficiency
Average efficiency for 14nm. AMD's competing chips at this price point draw less power for similar or better multi-core output.
14nm process is less efficient than newer nodes, drawing more power under load.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware acceleration
- Lacks modern AVX-512 instructions
- Not designed for AI workloads
- AVX-512 support included
- Good for basic CPU-based AI tasks
- No dedicated AI hardware
Content Creation
Gaming
- UHD 630 is not for gaming
- CPU can handle budget dGPUs without major issues
- Lacks PCIe 4.0 for future GPU upgrades
- Fantastic 1080p gaming performance
- Pairs perfectly with budget GPUs
- Good single-core boost speeds
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- High 4.7 GHz boost clock for snappy responsiveness
- Official support for newer 500-series chipsets
- Intel SGX for enterprise security enclaves
- Efficient 65W power profile
- Flexible drop-in option for OEMs
Cons
- Launched after 11th-gen, making it immediately outdated
- DDR4-2666 memory speed severely limits performance
- Still uses PCIe 3.0
- OEM-focused, hard to find at retail
- More expensive at launch ($154) than vastly superior 11th-gen parts
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Supports PCIe 4.0
- Good IPC improvements
- Includes integrated graphics (UHD 730)
Cons
- 14nm process is power-hungry under load
- Locked multiplier
- End-of-life platform (LGA 1200)
- Runs warm compared to newer architectures
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-10325
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-10100Rival
Budget Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-10400Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 4300GRival
Budget Desktop APU
Offers a massive IPC uplift, PCIe 4.0, and DDR4-3200 support on the same LGA 1700 platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
Doubles the core count and offers significantly better multi-threaded performance for a similar price.
- Intel Core i5-11400Alt
A 6-core 11th-gen part that shares the 500-series chipset support but offers much better productivity performance.
- AMD Ryzen 3 4100Alt
A modern Zen 2-based chip that provides better efficiency and upgradeability on the AM4 platform.
Core i5-11400
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600XRival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Rival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-10400Rival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-11600Rival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700XRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i5-12400FAlt
A newer 12th gen alternative with better single-core performance.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
Excellent alternative with strong multi-core performance.
Slightly cheaper alternative if you already have a dedicated GPU.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 7600Alt
A much faster, next-generation alternative.
A great budget alternative for pure gaming.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A niche OEM stopgap that offered slight clock improvements and newer chipset support, but it was quickly outclassed by 11th-gen alternatives.
Best for: Buying an Intel Core i3-10325 for a custom PC build in today's market makes very little sense. If you are purchasing a pre-built desktop or a barebones system that already includes this processor, it remains a solid performer for office work, homeschooling, and general home use. The 4.7 GHz boost clock ensures that snappy day-to-day responsiveness is present. However, if you are sourcing parts individually, you should absolutely opt for the 11th-generation Core i3-12100 or the i5-11400. Those processors offer significantly better IPC, DDR4-3200 memory support, and PCIe 4.0, often at similar or lower price points. The i3-10325's DDR4-2666 memory limitation is its biggest liability, holding back both CPU and integrated graphics performance. Only consider this chip if you are upgrading a locked OEM system that specifically requires a 400 or 500-series compatible CPU with these exact power characteristics.
Read the full reviewAn exceptional value desktop CPU that brought PCIe 4.0 and strong IPC to the budget market.
Best for: The Intel Core i5-11400 remains an incredibly smart purchase for budget PC builders, especially on the used market. If you are assembling a 1080p gaming rig or a general-purpose home PC and want to keep costs low, this processor offers phenomenal value. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration is more than sufficient for modern games when paired with a mid-range GPU. Because it is not unlocked, you should pair it with a B560 or H570 motherboard to at least allow memory overclocking, maximizing its potential. However, if you are buying brand new components, you might find better overall efficiency and upgradeability with a 12th Gen Alder Lake i5-12400F or a Ryzen 5 7600. Still, for under $100 on the secondhand market, the i5-11400 is an absolute steal that will comfortably handle everyday computing and mainstream gaming for years to come.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-10325 or Core i5-11400?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i5-11400 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-10325 or Core i5-11400?
For gaming, the Core i5-11400 leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among Intel Core i3-10325 and Core i5-11400.
Do Intel Core i3-10325 and Core i5-11400 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i3-10325: LGA 1200, Core i5-11400: Intel Socket 1200), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Core i5-11400 has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i3-10325 (4 cores), Core i5-11400 (6 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10325 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10325 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.