CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Core i3-8145UE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-10110Y is an ultra-low-power dual-core mobile processor from the Comet Lake-Y family, introduced in August 2019. Designed explicitly for fanless tablets, detachable 2-in-1 devices, and ultra-thin clamshells, it operates at a remarkably low 9W TDP. To achieve this, Intel drastically reduced the base clock to just 1.0 GHz, though it can still boost up to 4.0 GHz for short bursts when thermal headroom is available. It features 2 cores and 4 threads, along with a 4MB L3 cache. A defining limitation of the i3-10110Y is its memory support: it only supports legacy DDR3L memory, entirely skipping the DDR4 standard. It utilizes the BGA 1440 socket and is paired with basic UHD integrated graphics. While it remains technically listed as "Active" in some databases, it is a niche, obsolete part that has been comprehensively replaced by much more efficient ARM-based SoCs and modern Intel Core Ultra low-power chips in the tablet and ultra-mobile computing segments.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Can handle basic embedded UI tasks, but modern Windows interfaces will feel sluggish due to the 1 GHz base clock.
Handles single dedicated embedded applications well but will struggle with heavy multitasking due to 2 cores.
Gaming
Gaming is impossible. The combination of 2 cores, low power limits, and DDR3L memory bandwidth ensures zero playable frame rates.
Not applicable for industrial use cases.
Virtualization
Fundamentally incapable of running virtual machines.
4 threads allow for a very lightweight container or VM, but this is not a primary use case.
Efficiency
While 9W is low, modern ARM chips like the Apple M1 deliver vastly more performance at similar or lower power draws.
Excellent when configured to the 12.5W cTDP down, enabling fanless operation and minimal power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No AVX-512
- Cannot perform AI tasks
- No dedicated AI hardware.
- CPU inference is extremely slow on 2 cores.
- Not suitable for any AI workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- No gaming capability whatsoever
- DDR3L memory severely starves the integrated GPU
- Thermal throttling will occur almost instantly in 3D loads
- This is an embedded processor not designed for gaming.
- UHD 620 cannot handle modern 3D workloads.
- Form factors using this chip lack discrete GPU support.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- True 9W fanless operation
- Can boost to 4.0 GHz for brief moments
- Low cost for industrial repair parts
- Sufficient for static digital signage
- Low heat generation at idle
Cons
- DDR3L memory only, a massive bottleneck
- 1.0 GHz base clock is agonizingly slow
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- Completely obsolete for consumer use
- Outperformed by cheap ARM chips
Pros
- 12.5W cTDP down enables true fanless designs
- Long-lifecycle embedded support
- Hardware security mitigations included
- 10nm power efficiency
- Dual-channel memory support
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- Expensive for the compute performance offered
- Lacks LPDDR4/DDR5 support
- Outdated UHD Graphics 620
- No PCIe 4.0 support
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-8145UE
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Mobile
- Intel Celeron J4125Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- Intel Pentium Silver J5005Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GERival
Embedded Desktop
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 850Rival
Always-Connected
The non-embedded variant if long-lifecycle guarantees are not strictly required.
Compare head-to-head- Intel N100 (Alder Lake-N)Alt
A vastly superior modern alternative for new embedded designs featuring 4 efficient cores.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3580UAlt
Provides significantly more multi-threaded performance if the embedded chassis can handle the thermals.
- ARM Cortex-A78 Based SoCsAlt
Better efficiency for pure edge IoT tasks that do not strictly require x86.
Our Verdict on Each
Completely obsolete for consumers. The reliance on DDR3L and a 2-core design makes it unable to handle modern computing tasks efficiently.
Best for: There is virtually no consumer scenario in 2026 where purchasing a device with the Intel Core i3-10110Y makes sense. If you are buying a new tablet or ultra-thin laptop, Apple's iPad, Microsoft's Surface Pro with a Snapdragon or Intel Core Ultra chip, or any modern AMD-powered alternative will offer exponentially better performance, battery life, and display quality. If you are looking at the used market, be extremely cautious: the reliance on DDR3L RAM means the entire platform is obsolete, and the 2-core/4-thread configuration will struggle to load modern websites efficiently. The only justifiable reason to acquire this chip today is for repairing a specific legacy industrial panel PC or a specialized kiosk that was originally designed around this exact motherboard and thermal profile. For general computing, it is effectively a paperweight.
Read the full reviewA niche embedded chip that brings hardware-level security mitigations and 10nm efficiency to industrial form factors, though its 2-core architecture is fundamentally outdated for anything beyond basic embedded tasks.
Best for: Only for OEMs maintaining existing 8th gen embedded product lines or replacing failed units in active industrial installations.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-10110Y or Intel Core i3-8145UE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-8145UE comes out ahead with a score of 4/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-10110Y or Intel Core i3-8145UE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-10110Y leads with a gaming performance score of 2/100 among Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Core i3-8145UE.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-10110Y has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-10110Y (9 W), Intel Core i3-8145UE (15 W).
Do Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Core i3-8145UE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i3-10110Y: BGA 1440, Intel Core i3-8145UE: BGA 1528), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10110Y posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10110Y (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.