CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-1000G4 vs Intel Core i3-8145UE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-1000G4 is a standard 9-watt Ice Lake-Y mobile processor featuring two Sunny Cove cores paired with a 48EU Iris Plus GPU, designed for premium Windows ultra-thin laptops and convertibles.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Basic office tasks run fine, but the 2-core CPU will choke on heavy Excel sheets or multiple browser tabs.
Handles single dedicated embedded applications well but will struggle with heavy multitasking due to 2 cores.
Gaming
The 48EU Iris Plus can actually run older e-sports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at 720p/1080p low, a novelty for a 9W chip.
Not applicable for industrial use cases.
Virtualization
Virtually impossible to run useful virtual machines on 2 cores and a 9W power limit.
4 threads allow for a very lightweight container or VM, but this is not a primary use case.
Efficiency
Outstanding efficiency that allows for all-day battery life in premium ultrabooks.
Excellent when configured to the 12.5W cTDP down, enabling fanless operation and minimal power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- DLBoost provides basic AI acceleration, but the 2-core CPU limits practical applications
- No dedicated AI hardware.
- CPU inference is extremely slow on 2 cores.
- Not suitable for any AI workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Can handle older e-sports titles at low settings thanks to the 48EU GPU
- The 2-core CPU will bottleneck heavily in any CPU-intensive game scene
- Not suitable for modern AAA gaming
- This is an embedded processor not designed for gaming.
- UHD 620 cannot handle modern 3D workloads.
- Form factors using this chip lack discrete GPU support.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 48EU Iris Plus graphics are surprisingly capable for a 9W chip
- True fanless operation is possible, resulting in zero noise
- 10nm process provides excellent idle battery life
- Can drive multiple 4K external displays
- Supports hardware-accelerated video encoding
Cons
- Only 2 CPU cores make modern Windows 11 feel incredibly sluggish
- Base clock of 1.1 GHz is too low for snappy UI responsiveness
- Limited to PCIe 3.0
- Completely obsolete for any modern productivity workflow
- Soldered RAM and CPU mean no upgrade path
Pros
- 12.5W cTDP down enables true fanless designs
- Long-lifecycle embedded support
- Hardware security mitigations included
- 10nm power efficiency
- Dual-channel memory support
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- Expensive for the compute performance offered
- Lacks LPDDR4/DDR5 support
- Outdated UHD Graphics 620
- No PCIe 4.0 support
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-1000G4
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-1000G1Rival
Lower-Tier Ice Lake-Y
- AMD Ryzen 5 3500URival
Mainstream Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-1035G4Rival
Higher-Tier Ice Lake-U
- Apple A12Z BionicRival
Tablet/ARM
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
A modern 6-core Windows laptop CPU that offers vastly superior multitasking.
- Intel N100Alt
For low-power tasks, this modern chip offers 4 efficiency cores and better performance.
A modern 10-core (2P+8E) Alder Lake chip that redefines low-power laptop performance.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
If open to macOS, the efficiency and performance gap is monumental.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-8145UE
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Mobile
- Intel Celeron J4125Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- Intel Pentium Silver J5005Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GERival
Embedded Desktop
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 850Rival
Always-Connected
The non-embedded variant if long-lifecycle guarantees are not strictly required.
Compare head-to-head- Intel N100 (Alder Lake-N)Alt
A vastly superior modern alternative for new embedded designs featuring 4 efficient cores.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3580UAlt
Provides significantly more multi-threaded performance if the embedded chassis can handle the thermals.
- ARM Cortex-A78 Based SoCsAlt
Better efficiency for pure edge IoT tasks that do not strictly require x86.
Our Verdict on Each
The i3-1000G4 offered a compelling graphics upgrade over the G1 for ultra-thin Windows devices in 2019, but its 2-core CPU severely limits its usefulness today.
Best for: Consider a laptop with the i3-1000G4 only if it is being given away for free or costs under $50, and you need a disposable machine for basic word processing or playing old 2D games. The 48EU graphics are genuinely capable for legacy gaming, which might appeal to retro gamers looking for a silent, portable machine.
Read the full reviewA niche embedded chip that brings hardware-level security mitigations and 10nm efficiency to industrial form factors, though its 2-core architecture is fundamentally outdated for anything beyond basic embedded tasks.
Best for: Only for OEMs maintaining existing 8th gen embedded product lines or replacing failed units in active industrial installations.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-1000G4 or Intel Core i3-8145UE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-1000G4 comes out ahead with a score of 4.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-1000G4 or Intel Core i3-8145UE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-1000G4 leads with a gaming performance score of 15/100 among Intel Core i3-1000G4 and Intel Core i3-8145UE.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-1000G4 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-1000G4 (9 W), Intel Core i3-8145UE (15 W).
Do Intel Core i3-1000G4 and Intel Core i3-8145UE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i3-1000G4: BGA 1377, Intel Core i3-8145UE: BGA 1528), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-1000G4 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-1000G4 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.