CPU Comparison
Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core 5 223PTE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. An 8-core, 16-thread Bartlett Lake embedded processor on LGA1700 with UHD Graphics 730, DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel memory with ECC, PCIe 5.0 from the CPU, and a 65 W base power target aimed at edge and embedded platforms that benefit from long-life availability and stable supply.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Eight P-cores and 16 threads at up to 5.2 GHz provide solid performance for compile jobs, databases, and multi-tab workflows; the uniform core design avoids hybrid scheduling quirks.
With eight P‑cores and HT, it should handle typical office and light creator workloads competently. Official benchmark scores are not available at this time.
Gaming
Not marketed for gaming. With only UHD 730 graphics and no enthusiast overclocking, it is adequate for casual or legacy titles at low settings but is better suited to non-gaming workloads.
Not marketed for gaming. The 223PTE can drive lightweight or legacy titles and eSports at 1080p with the iGPU, but its value lies elsewhere.
Efficiency
The 65 W base power keeps idle and average consumption modest for an 8-core part, which benefits 24/7 edge deployments where power and thermal budgets are constrained.
At 45 W base power and with P‑core‑only operation, 223PTE is tuned for efficiency and consistent behavior in thermally constrained environments.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Supports Intel DL Boost on CPU for INT8 inference, but lacks a discrete NPU or high-topology GPU, so AI workloads are limited to small models or batch jobs.
- OpenVINO can leverage DL Boost for edge inference, but performance will not match NPUs or dedicated accelerators.
- Intel DL Boost is listed, enabling VNNI/INT8 acceleration on CPU for compatible workloads via OpenVINO and other tools.
- There is no discrete NPU or GPU‑based AI accelerator; heavy AI workloads should use a dedicated GPU or other accelerators.
- For edge AI, vendors often pair Bartlett Lake with entry‑level Arc or other GPUs.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated UHD 730 with 24 EUs is sufficient for desktop compositing and video decode, not high-fidelity gaming.
- No unlocked multiplier limits CPU-side tuning for gaming scenarios.
- If gaming is required, plan to use a discrete GPU; even then, newer consumer chips are typically better value for gaming.
- The 223PTE is not marketed or positioned as a gaming processor.
- The UHD 770 iGPU can handle older or eSports titles at 1080p, but discrete GPUs are recommended for modern AAA gaming.
- Motherboards and BIOSes for Bartlett Lake are typically industrial/embedded-focused and may lack enthusiast tuning features.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Eight uniform P-cores and 16 threads with up to 5.2 GHz boost.
- 65 W base power enables compact and quiet embedded designs.
- ECC memory support on both DDR5 and DDR4 increases reliability for edge and workstation uses.
- PCIe 5.0 from the CPU with 20 lanes supports fast NVMe and expansion cards.
- LGA1700 compatibility allows reuse of existing 600-series embedded boards and coolers.
- Intel UHD 730 iGPU with four-display support (eDP, DP, HDMI).
- Long-life embedded focus improves supply stability for OEMs.
Cons
- No integrated NPU; AI workloads rely solely on CPU and iGPU.
- Locked multiplier limits enthusiast tuning.
- iGPU (UHD 730) is not suitable for modern AAA gaming.
- Memory speeds are conservative (DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200) by current desktop standards.
- Embedded positioning means consumer motherboard support may be limited outside industrial vendors.
Pros
- Eight Raptor Cove P‑cores with HT provide predictable, strong per‑core and multi‑thread performance for edge workloads.
- 45 W base power suits compact, passively cooled or fan‑constrained enclosures.
- Dual‑channel DDR5‑5600 and DDR4‑3200 with ECC support.
- Up to 20 PCIe lanes from the CPU (PCIe 5.0 + 4.0) for flexible GPU and NVMe attachment.
- UHD 770 with 32 EUs supports up to four displays, useful for signage and monitoring.
- Validated with embedded chipsets (R680E, Q670E, H610E, W680) and industrial boards.
- Drop‑in compatible with existing LGA1700 designs, easing upgrades for OEMs.
- Intel DL Boost (VNNI) enables CPU‑based inference acceleration.
Cons
- Not targeted at consumer gaming; limited enthusiast motherboard support.
- Multiplier locked; manual overclocking is not supported.
- Official Max Turbo Power (PL2) and PL2 Tau values are not published on Intel ARK for 223PTE and could not be verified from authoritative sources at this time.
- Platform and BIOS support are oriented to OEMs/industrial customers, not DIY enthusiasts.
- No E‑cores; for some highly threaded workloads, hybrid predecessors may behave differently.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core 5 213PE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U (8-core, 65 W TDP, Zen 4, RDNA3 iGPU)Rival
Embedded/Edge
- Intel Core 5 223PE (8-core, 65 W, Bartlett Lake with UHD 770 and 5.4 GHz boost)Rival
Embedded/Edge
- Intel Core i5-14500 (14-core hybrid, 65 W, Raptor Lake Refresh)Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (8-core, 65 W, Zen 4, Radeon 780M iGPU)Rival
Desktop APU
- Intel Core i5-13500 (14-core hybrid, 65 W, Raptor Lake)Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- Intel Core 5 211TE (10-core hybrid, 65 W, Bartlett Lake)Alt
More cores if your workload scales well with threads, though it uses a hybrid P+E design.
- Intel Core 5 223PE (8-core, 65 W, Bartlett Lake, UHD 770)Alt
Slightly higher boost and better iGPU (UHD 770) if you need stronger display or transcode performance.
- AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840UAlt
Competing 8-core embedded part with strong iGPU and AI engine, useful if your software stack favors AMD.
More cores (6P+8E) for mixed workloads if you can forgo embedded-specific guarantees and ECC on DDR5.
Compare head-to-headCost-effective 14-core option on the same LGA1700 platform with DDR5/ECC support and mature BIOS.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core 5 223PTE
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GRival
Integrated-graphics desktop APU (AM4)
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600GRival
Integrated-graphics desktop APU (AM5, RDNA3 iGPU)
- Intel Core i5-12400Rival
Mainstream desktop CPU (LGA1700, no ECC by default)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-14400Rival
Mainstream desktop CPU (LGA1700, hybrid P+E cores)
- Intel Core 5 223PE (65 W variant)Rival
Bartlett Lake embedded (higher base power, same cores/cache)
Lower-clocked Bartlett Lake 45 W part (2.1 GHz base, 5.2 GHz boost, 24 EU iGPU) for cost-sensitive edge designs.
Compare head-to-head65 W Bartlett Lake variant (2.9 GHz base, 5.4 GHz boost) if higher sustained clocks are acceptable within your thermal budget.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i5-12400/14400Alt
If your deployment does not need ECC, LTSC focus, or TCC/TSN, mainstream LGA1700 CPUs may offer broader motherboard choice.
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600G (AM5)Alt
If your priority is stronger integrated graphics (RDNA3) and a consumer ecosystem with frequent BIOS updates.
- Intel Core 7 253PTE (Bartlett Lake)Alt
If you need more cores/threads (10 P‑cores) for heavier edge workloads, at higher power and cost.
Our Verdict on Each
A focused embedded SKU that trades enthusiast features for long-term stability and platform compatibility. The uniform eight P-core design, ECC support, and 65 W base power make it attractive for edge and small workstation builds, particularly where LGA1700 infrastructure already exists.
Best for: Edge appliance, industrial PC, or small workstation build that benefits from ECC, PCIe 5.0 storage, and LGA1700 platform reuse.
Read the full reviewA well-balanced, 45 W, P‑core‑only Bartlett Lake part that trades enthusiast overclocking for embedded-friendly features like ECC, LTSC support, and TCC/TSN readiness. Best suited for edge appliances and industrial PCs rather than DIY gaming builds.
Best for: OEMs, system integrators, and deployers building edge appliances, industrial PCs, digital‑signage players, or control systems that need LGA1700 longevity, ECC support, multi‑display outputs, and long‑term supply commitments.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core 5 213PE or Intel Core 5 223PTE?
For gaming, the Intel Core 5 223PTE leads with a gaming performance score of 0/100 among Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Core 5 223PTE.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core 5 223PTE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core 5 213PE (65 W), Intel Core 5 223PTE (45 W).
Do Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Core 5 223PTE use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA1700 (Intel Socket 1700) socket, so they share compatible motherboards.