CPU Comparison
Intel Core 5 120U vs Core i5-1335U
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. A 15-watt, 10-core (2P+8E) mobile processor from Intel’s Core (Series 1) lineup built on the Intel 7 process. It pairs high P-core boost clocks up to 5.0 GHz with an 80 EU Iris Xe iGPU, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 or LPDDR4x/LPDDR5 memory, and up to 20 total PCIe lanes, targeting everyday thin-and-light laptops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles office suites, browsers with many tabs, and light creative workflows well. Multi-thread performance is limited by the 15W PL1 and lack of Hyper-Threading on E-cores.
Smooth performance for everyday office tasks and multitasking.
Gaming
Fine for esports and older/light titles at 1080p with low–medium settings; not intended for AAA gaming at high settings.
Suitable only for e-sports and older games at reduced settings.
Virtualization
Basic VM support, but constrained by core count and memory bandwidth.
Efficiency
The 15W base power and Intel 7 process help thin-and-lights achieve long battery life in typical office use, especially with LPDDR memory.
Exceptional efficiency, ensuring long battery life for on-the-go use.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated NPU; AI workloads rely on CPU and GPU.
- Intel DL Boost (VNNI) is supported on the CPU, enabling some acceleration for inference.
- Suitable for small-scale, occasional local inference; not intended for heavy AI training or large LLM serving.
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Relies on CPU/GPU for AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated Iris Xe 80 EU is sufficient for e-sports titles and older games at 1080p.
- Modern AAA titles will generally require low settings and may still struggle; not a gaming-focused part.
- Integrated GPU limits gaming potential
- Requires dual-channel RAM for best iGPU results
- Not designed for AAA titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Good single-thread performance for office and browsing at 15W.
- Modern I/O with Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 4.0 from the CPU.
- Flexible memory support (DDR4/DDR5 and LPDDR variants) up to 96 GB.
- Integrated Iris Xe 80 EU GPU with AV1 decode and multi-display support.
- Business features (vPro Essentials eligibility, TXT, Boot Guard, CET) on supported systems.
Cons
- Only 15W base power; multi-core throughput is limited under sustained loads.
- No Hyper-Threading on E-cores; long multi-thread tasks don’t scale as well as higher-TDP parts.
- No dedicated NPU for AI workloads.
- Gaming performance is limited to light or older titles.
- Locked multiplier; no enthusiast overclocking.
Pros
- Great power efficiency
- Solid single-core performance
- 10-core hybrid design
- Iris Xe 80EU graphics
- DDR5 support
Cons
- Low base clock speed
- Weak for heavy gaming
- BGA soldered
- Sustained performance limited by cooling
- Not an enthusiast chip
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core 5 120U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7530URival
Thin-and-light 15W mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535URival
Thin-and-light 15W mobile
- Intel Core i5-1335URival
13th Gen Raptor Lake-U 15W
- Intel Core i5-1345URival
13th Gen Raptor Lake-U 15W
- Apple M2 (7-core or 8-core GPU)Rival
Thin-and-light ARM-based laptop
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (Arrow Lake)Alt
Newer architecture with an NPU and more modern features if AI features and efficiency are priorities.
Core i5-1335U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7530URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-1345URival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1355UAlt
More EUs in the iGPU and higher clocks for better graphics.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735UAlt
Stronger integrated Radeon graphics.
More P-cores for better sustained multi-threading at the cost of battery.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Incredible battery life and passively cooled designs.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A competent 15W chip that delivers snappy day-to-day performance and solid battery life in mainstream laptops, but it’s not built for sustained heavy workloads or AAA gaming. The 2P+8E layout and 5.0 GHz P-core boost are strong for the segment; the 80 EU iGPU handles everyday graphics and light gaming adequately. Choose it for everyday work and study rather than intensive creator tasks.
Best for: Everyday productivity, study, and light creative work in a thin-and-light laptop where battery life and cost matter more than peak multi-core performance.
Read the full reviewA highly capable mobile chip for daily tasks and light workloads, offering great efficiency and adequate burst speed for typical user needs.
Best for: Purchasing a mainstream ultrabook for school or office use.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core 5 120U or Core i5-1335U?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i5-1335U comes out ahead with a score of 7.9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core 5 120U or Core i5-1335U?
For gaming, the Core i5-1335U leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Intel Core 5 120U and Core i5-1335U.
Do Intel Core 5 120U and Core i5-1335U use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core 5 120U: FCBGA1744 (Intel BGA 1744), Core i5-1335U: Intel BGA 1744), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core 5 120U posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core 5 120U (9,946), Core i5-1335U (9,300). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.