CPU Comparison

Intel Core i7-930 vs Intel Core i7-975

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Released in February 2010, the Intel Core i7-930 was a natural evolution of the highly successful i7-920. As a 45nm Bloomfield processor, it retained the four-core, eight-thread design and 8MB of L3 cache. The primary improvement was a slight bump in base frequency to 2.8GHz and a turbo boost to 3.06GHz. This minor clock speed increase provided a small but noticeable performance uplift out of the box. Like its predecessor, it dropped into the LGA 1366 socket and supported triple-channel DDR3 memory. While it wasn't a radical departure from the 920, it became the default choice for new LGA 1366 builders. It maintained the legendary overclocking capability of the Bloomfield platform, allowing enthusiasts to push well beyond 4GHz. The i7-930 served as a reliable workhorse for gaming and content creation during a transitional period before Sandy Bridge.

Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-930
4C / 8T3.06 GHz130 W
8.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7 Extreme Edition
Intel Core i7-975
4C / 8T3.6 GHz130 W
8.8
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
High-End Desktop
Segment
Desktop
High-End Desktop
Generation
1st Generation (Nehalem)
1st Generation (Nehalem)
Launched
2010
2009
Status
End-of-life
End-of-life
Codename
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Series
Core i7
Core i7 Extreme Edition
Family
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-920
Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition
Successor
Intel Core i7-960
Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
8
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.33 GHz
Boost Clock
3.06 GHz
3.6 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
TDP
130 W
130 W
Architecture
Architecture
Nehalem (Bloomfield)
Nehalem (Bloomfield)
Process Node
45nm
45nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066
Memory Channels
Triple (3)
Triple (3)
Max Memory
24 GB
24 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1366
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
PCIe Lanes
36
36
Integrated GPU
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i7-93028

8 threads help, but low IPC limits modern productivity.

Intel Core i7-975Best32

8 threads help, but low IPC limits modern apps.

Gaming

Intel Core i7-93032

Bottlenecks modern GPUs but handles 2010-era games perfectly.

Intel Core i7-975Best38

Best single-core of the Bloomfields, but still bottlenecks modern games.

Virtualization

Intel Core i7-93042

Good for basic VMs and legacy server setups.

Intel Core i7-975Best45

Good for basic VMs and legacy server setups.

Efficiency

Intel Core i7-93010

130W TDP is highly inefficient for a quad-core.

Intel Core i7-975Best12

130W TDP is highly inefficient, though slightly better than 965.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i7-930None
  • Incompatible with modern AI workloads
Intel Core i7-975None
  • Incompatible with modern AI workloads

Content Creation

Intel Core i7-930Poor (Modern)
Basic 1080p Editing (Legacy)
Intel Core i7-975Moderate (Legacy)
Legacy PremiereLegacy 3ds MaxHandbrake

Gaming

Intel Core i7-930Poor (Modern)
  • Low IPC
  • No AVX2
  • Bottlenecks modern titles
Intel Core i7-975Poor (Modern)
  • Low IPC
  • No AVX2
  • Bottlenecks modern GPUs

Industry Impact

Gaming
Moderate
High
Workstations
Moderate
High
Content Creation
Moderate
High
Virtualization
Low
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Retro Gaming
Very Good
Excellent
Legacy Video Editing
Good
Basic Virtualization
Good
Modern Gaming
Poor
Poor
Modern Office Work
Poor
Poor
Legacy 3D Rendering
Excellent
Video Transcoding
Very Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Targeted
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i7-930

Pros

  • Good overclocking headroom (D0 stepping)
  • Affordable at launch
  • Hyper-Threading for 8 threads
  • Triple-channel memory support
  • Reliable workhorse for its era

Cons

  • High 130W TDP
  • Locked CPU multiplier
  • Obsolete platform
  • Lacks modern instruction sets
  • Poor single-core performance today
Intel Core i7-975

Pros

  • Highest stock clocks for Bloomfield
  • Fully unlocked multiplier
  • Improved D0 stepping for better thermals
  • Hyper-Threading for 8 threads
  • Triple-channel memory support

Cons

  • Extremely high launch price ($999)
  • High 130W TDP
  • Obsolete platform
  • Lacks modern instruction sets
  • Poor value today

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i7-930

Intel Core i7-975

  • Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Phenom II X4 965

    Desktop

    Rival
  • Rival
    Compare head-to-head
  • Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770

    HEDT

    Rival
  • AMD Phenom II X6 1090T

    Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon W3580
    Alt

    Server equivalent often available for less.

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    Alt

    A modern budget CPU that vastly outperforms it.

  • Intel Core i5-12400F
    Alt

    A modern budget CPU that obliterates it.

Our Verdict on Each

A solid incremental update to the 920. It offered great value for LGA 1366 builders but is obsolete today.

Best for: Retro build or cheap replacement for a dead LGA 1366 CPU.

Read the full review

The pinnacle of the 45nm quad-core era. A legendary overclocker's chip that is now a collector's item.

Best for: Collector's showcase or extreme retro overclocking build.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i7-930 or Intel Core i7-975?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-975 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-930 or Intel Core i7-975?

For gaming, the Intel Core i7-975 leads with a gaming performance score of 38/100 among Intel Core i7-930 and Intel Core i7-975.

Do Intel Core i7-930 and Intel Core i7-975 use the same socket?

Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1366 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.